RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      지방정부의 권력구조와 재정지출정향

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76255370

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study focuses on analyzing the impacts of the power structure of Korean local governments on the spending patterns of local public expenditures by using panel data of 195 local governments from 1996 through 2001. In this study, the construct 'power structure' was conceptually defined as the structure of policy role between the local government chief and the council, and then it was operationalized into dummy variable 'Domin'(chief-dominant pattern=1, chlef -nondorninant pattern=0) through the scale composed of the suggestion of ordinances and the oversights such as audit, inspection and interpellation. Some other variables(the third variables) except power structure variable that are expected to affect Korean local expenditures were included in the model as independent variables, and the expenditures related to growth policy, welfare policy, and development policy were operationalized into dependent variables on the basis of the literature review, the theories that explain the changes of local public expenditures, and the annual expenditure items. The empirical results indicated that chief-dominant-type governments had more expenses related to growth policy than chief-nondominant-type governments. The increase of growth expenditures may possible because local government chiefs very sensitive to any structural vulnerability of our local finance took interest in growth policy to revitalize local economy, to secure financial resources useful to carrying out commitment projects, and to increase in tax revenues through the aftereffects of the extension of corporate earnings.
      번역하기

      This study focuses on analyzing the impacts of the power structure of Korean local governments on the spending patterns of local public expenditures by using panel data of 195 local governments from 1996 through 2001. In this study, the construct 'pow...

      This study focuses on analyzing the impacts of the power structure of Korean local governments on the spending patterns of local public expenditures by using panel data of 195 local governments from 1996 through 2001. In this study, the construct 'power structure' was conceptually defined as the structure of policy role between the local government chief and the council, and then it was operationalized into dummy variable 'Domin'(chief-dominant pattern=1, chlef -nondorninant pattern=0) through the scale composed of the suggestion of ordinances and the oversights such as audit, inspection and interpellation. Some other variables(the third variables) except power structure variable that are expected to affect Korean local expenditures were included in the model as independent variables, and the expenditures related to growth policy, welfare policy, and development policy were operationalized into dependent variables on the basis of the literature review, the theories that explain the changes of local public expenditures, and the annual expenditure items. The empirical results indicated that chief-dominant-type governments had more expenses related to growth policy than chief-nondominant-type governments. The increase of growth expenditures may possible because local government chiefs very sensitive to any structural vulnerability of our local finance took interest in growth policy to revitalize local economy, to secure financial resources useful to carrying out commitment projects, and to increase in tax revenues through the aftereffects of the extension of corporate earnings.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 논의와 경험적 연구
      • Ⅲ. 조사설계 및 분석모형의 설정
      • Ⅳ. 패널데이타분석(Panel Data Method) 결과
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 논의와 경험적 연구
      • Ⅲ. 조사설계 및 분석모형의 설정
      • Ⅳ. 패널데이타분석(Panel Data Method) 결과
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 〈참고문헌〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 허명환, "한국 지방자치단체의 공공선택모델" 한국재정학회 13 (13): 113-138, 1999

      2 허재완, "지역개발정책의 동향과 삶의 질" 1997

      3 강윤호, "지방정부 재정지출의 특성" 12 (12): 151-174, 2003

      4 권경환, "지방정부 재정지출의 정향변화에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 행정대학원 2004a

      5 null, "지방재정운용과 민선시장의 역할" (겨울호) : 21-40, 2001

      6 "지방자치제와 재정수요의 영향평가 및 예측" 611-623, 1992

      7 손희준, "지방자치제 실시에 따른 지방재정지출의 결정요인분석" 33 (33): 81-97, 1999

      8 이승종김흥식, "지방자치와 지방정부의 정책정향-복지서비스 기능을 중심으로-" 573-589, 1992

      9 이승종, "지방자치와 지방정부의 복지정책정향" 34 (34): 197-215, 2000

      10 배인명, "지방자치와 지방복지재정 서울시 자치구를 중심으로" 5 (5): 143-160, 2000

      1 허명환, "한국 지방자치단체의 공공선택모델" 한국재정학회 13 (13): 113-138, 1999

      2 허재완, "지역개발정책의 동향과 삶의 질" 1997

      3 강윤호, "지방정부 재정지출의 특성" 12 (12): 151-174, 2003

      4 권경환, "지방정부 재정지출의 정향변화에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 행정대학원 2004a

      5 null, "지방재정운용과 민선시장의 역할" (겨울호) : 21-40, 2001

      6 "지방자치제와 재정수요의 영향평가 및 예측" 611-623, 1992

      7 손희준, "지방자치제 실시에 따른 지방재정지출의 결정요인분석" 33 (33): 81-97, 1999

      8 이승종김흥식, "지방자치와 지방정부의 정책정향-복지서비스 기능을 중심으로-" 573-589, 1992

      9 이승종, "지방자치와 지방정부의 복지정책정향" 34 (34): 197-215, 2000

      10 배인명, "지방자치와 지방복지재정 서울시 자치구를 중심으로" 5 (5): 143-160, 2000

      11 임헌만, "지방의회와 자치단체장의 정책역할구조에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 행정대학원 1999

      12 김태일, "지방의회 구성과 단체장 선출이 자치단체 사회복지지출 규모에 미친 영향" 35 (35): 69-89, 2001

      13 김호섭, "정부조직의 분권화와 상관변수" 35 (35): 35-51, 2001

      14 이성복, "도시행정론-한국의 도시를 중심으로" 법문사 4 : 2000

      15 유재원, "단체장 민선이후 자치단체의 정책변화 Peterson의 도시한계론 검증" 8 (8): 79-98, 1999

      16 Dye, "and Policy in American Cities" 103-122,

      17 Nunn, "Urban Infrastructure Policies and Capital Spending in City Manager and Strong Mayor Cities" 93-112, 1996

      18 Johnsen, "The political economy of benefits and costs A neoclassical approach to distributive politics The Journal of Political Economy" 642-664, 1981

      19 null, "The effects of mayoral power on urban fiscal policy" 23 (23): 231-243, 1995

      20 Campbell, "The effect of management form and separation of powers" 23-34, 2003

      21 Hayes, "The Relative Efficiency of City Government and Mayor-Council Forms of Government" 167-177, 1990

      22 Turnbull, "The Median Voter according to GARP" 1001-1010, 1998

      23 Rosenthal, "Structure and Values in Local Political Systems The Case of Fluoridation Decisions Journal of Politics" 169-196,

      24 Gurwitt,Rob, "Strong Mayors-The Lure of the Strong Mayor.Governing Magazine"

      25 Hambleton, "Strong Mayors on the Catwalk" 1990

      26 "Strengthening Political Leadership in UK Local Government" 41-51, 1998a

      27 Lineberry, "Reformism and public Policies in American cities" 701-716, 1967

      28 Lyons, "Reform and Response in American Cities" 118-132, 1978

      29 Persons,Georgia A, "Reflections on Mayoral Leadership:The Impact of Issuess and Changing Times" 46 (46): 205-218, 1985

      30 Morgan, "Policy leadership in council-manager cities" 438-446, 1992

      31 Oxford, "Official Leadership in the City Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation" Oxford University Press 1990

      32 McDonald,, "Oakland's "strong mayor" 57-60, 2003

      33 "Modernising Political Management in Local Government" 931-950, 2000a

      34 "Mayors of American Cities An Analysis of Powers and Responsibilities" 1996

      35 James H, "Mayoral leadership in council-manager cities Journal of Publics" 207-227, 1987

      36 Kuo, "Mayor influence in urban policy making The American Journal of Sociology" 620-638, 1973

      37 "Local Government Political Management Arrangements-An International Perspective. Edinburgh" 1998b

      38 Sweeting, "Leadership in Urban Governance the Mayor of London" 3-20, 2002

      39 "IMF 경제위기가 지방재정지출정향에 미친 영향분석" 42 (42): 211-237, 2004b

      40 "How strong is the Mayor of London?" 465-478, 2003

      41 Cohen, "His Battle for Chicago and the Nation" 2000

      42 Mitchell B, "General assistance among cities An explanation of the need" 1987

      43 ed, "Facilitative Leadership in Local Government Lessons from Successful Mayors and Chairpersons" Jossey_Bass 1994

      44 Barrilleaux, "Do Governors Matter? Budgeting Rules and the Politics of State Policymaking" 409-417, 2003

      45 Gerald R, "Constraints on Administrator Discretion The Limited Influence of Mayors on City Budgets" 475-498, 1977

      46 Lubell, "Collaborative Research on Institutions and Land-Use Politics" 2003

      47 Peterson,Paul E, "City limits" University of Chicago Press 1981

      48 Blodgett, "Beware the Lure of the Concentrating Power in One Person May Make Things Worse" 6-11, 1994

      49 Ruhil A, "A framework for analyzing the effects of urban events" 396-416, 2003

      50 Liebert, "A Reanalysis of Recent Research" 765-783, 1974

      51 Sweeting, "-Style Leadership for English Local Government?" 474-488, 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.17 1.17 1.31
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.26 1.18 1.419 0.42
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼