RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Text Readability and Vocabulary Frequency Levels: Analyzing Reading Texts in the College Scholastic Ability Test

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104096300

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The quantitative study investigated reading difficulty by analyzing Flesch-Kincaid readability index and vocabulary frequency levels of the texts in the College Scholastic Ability Test from 2002 to 2011 in Korea. Analyses of readability index and voca...

      The quantitative study investigated reading difficulty by analyzing Flesch-Kincaid readability index and vocabulary frequency levels of the texts in the College Scholastic Ability Test from 2002 to 2011 in Korea. Analyses of readability index and vocabulary frequency levels of the texts used in the test yielded the following clear results: both reading difficulty and vocabulary frequency levels including 1000, 2000, UWL (University Word Level), and not-in-the-list frequency level have increased over the last ten years. The tendency suggests that there has been a gradual change in terms of reading difficulty in accordance with the level of vocabulary in the test. Additionally, the results imply that the steady increase in both reading difficulty and vocabulary frequency levels has improved the authenticity of the test based on the perspective that students will actually confront texts with the similar level of vocabulary difficulty and lengths or even longer than those as the CSAT test in their academic contexts. This finding, though, runs counter to foreign language policy stated by the Ministry of Education, which currently focuses on communicative language ability and subsequent practical language use in real life.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김낙복, "대학수학능력시험 외국어(영어)영역의 코퍼스 언어학적 어휘 비교 분석" 한국영어어문교육학회 14 (14): 201-221, 2008

      2 성윤미, "대학수학능력시험 외국어(영어)영역에 영향을 미치는 요인들" 한국영어어문교육학회 9 (9): 213-241, 2004

      3 장경숙, "대학수학능력시험 외국어(영어)영역 읽기 난이도 예측 모형 개발" 한국외국어교육학회 11 (11): 111-130, 2004

      4 National Board of Educational Evaluation, "nyondo taehak suhak nungrok sihom haesol (Guidance for the '96 College Scholastic Ability Test)" National Board of Educational Evaluation 1995

      5 Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use : Lexical richness in L2 written production" 16 (16): 307-322, 1995

      6 Schmitt, N., "Vocabulary in language teaching" Cambridge University Press 2000

      7 Engber, C. A., "The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions" 4 (4): 139-155, 1995

      8 Laufer, B., "The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time?" 25 (25): 21-33, 1994

      9 Laufer, B., "The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don't know, words you think you know and words you can't guess, In Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy" Cambridge University Press 20-34, 1997

      10 Laufer, B., "The development of L2 lexis in the expression of the advanced learners" 75 : 440-448, 1991

      1 김낙복, "대학수학능력시험 외국어(영어)영역의 코퍼스 언어학적 어휘 비교 분석" 한국영어어문교육학회 14 (14): 201-221, 2008

      2 성윤미, "대학수학능력시험 외국어(영어)영역에 영향을 미치는 요인들" 한국영어어문교육학회 9 (9): 213-241, 2004

      3 장경숙, "대학수학능력시험 외국어(영어)영역 읽기 난이도 예측 모형 개발" 한국외국어교육학회 11 (11): 111-130, 2004

      4 National Board of Educational Evaluation, "nyondo taehak suhak nungrok sihom haesol (Guidance for the '96 College Scholastic Ability Test)" National Board of Educational Evaluation 1995

      5 Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use : Lexical richness in L2 written production" 16 (16): 307-322, 1995

      6 Schmitt, N., "Vocabulary in language teaching" Cambridge University Press 2000

      7 Engber, C. A., "The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions" 4 (4): 139-155, 1995

      8 Laufer, B., "The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time?" 25 (25): 21-33, 1994

      9 Laufer, B., "The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don't know, words you think you know and words you can't guess, In Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy" Cambridge University Press 20-34, 1997

      10 Laufer, B., "The development of L2 lexis in the expression of the advanced learners" 75 : 440-448, 1991

      11 Chall, J. S., "The Dale-Chall Readability Formula" Brookline Books 1995

      12 Brown, J., D., "Testing in language programs: A comprehensive guide to English language assessment" McGrow-Hill ESL/ELT 2005

      13 Lee, J-H., "Some comprehensive suggestions for the improvement of the College Scholastic Abilities Test(CSAT)" 56 (56): 333-364, 2001

      14 McNamara, D. S., "Self-explanation and metacognition: The dynamics of reading, In Handbook of Metacognition in Education" Erlbaum 60-81, 2009

      15 Hamsik, M. J., "Reading, readability, and the ESL reader" University of South Florida 1984

      16 Greenfield, J., "Readability formulas for EFL" 26 : 5-24, 2004

      17 Fountas, I. C., "Matching books to readers: Using leveled books in guided reading, K-3" Heinemann 1999

      18 Li, S., "Lexical? semantic organization in children with specific language impairment" 53 : 146-159, 2010

      19 Laufer, B., "Lexical threshold revisited : Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension" 22 (22): 15-30, 2010

      20 Nation, I. S. P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" Cambridge University Press 2001

      21 Fulcher, G., "Language testing and assessment" Routledge 2007

      22 McNamara, T., "Language Testing" Oxford University Press 2000

      23 Qian, D. D., "Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective" 52 (52): 513-536, 2002

      24 Nation, I. S. P., "How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?" 63 (63): 59-82, 2006

      25 Min, H-T., "EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention. Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading" 58 (58): 73-115, 2008

      26 Sökmen, A., "Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary, In Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy" Cambridge University Press 237-257, 1997

      27 Maslin, P., "Comparison of readability and decidability levels across five first grade basal programs" 44 (44): 59-75, 2007

      28 Kim, M-J., "Comparing question types in the high school English textbooks and the College Scholastic Abilities Test" 56 (56): 349-371, 2001

      29 Crossley, S. A., "Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices" 42 (42): 475-493, 2007

      30 Crossley, S. A., "Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices" 42 (42): 475-493, 2008

      31 Goodfellow, R., "Assessing learners’ writing using lexical frequency" 14 (14): 133-145, 2002

      32 Laufer, B., "A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability" 16 : 33-51, 1999

      33 Bauer, F., "A validity study of the English subtest of the College Scholastic Ability Test" 52 (52): 41-58, 1997

      34 Xue, G., "A university word list" 3 : 215-229, 1984

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.75 0.75 0.77
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.7 0.68 1.275 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼