RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      口供排除规则的易经原则解析

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103259632

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Whether it’s because of the case condition, adjustive measures to local conditions, or even further refinement rules or legislation followed suit, in pursuit of certainty for application of the exclusionary rules of oral confession from uncertainty of the legislation the precedent , the principles of the I ching can provide us the effective tool with a grasp of the change trend of the illegal confession exclusionary rules’ text and the model of judicial practice.It is because the eternal pursuit of justice, that exclusionary rules of oral confession have started from scratch, and developed from few to many in text and practice. Exclusionary rule of oral confession in different periods of history, regions, procedural stages as well as the concrete objects also has a different form of its expression. Illegally-obtained confession can be type into 4 kinds such as non-voluntary confessions, illegally-obtained confessions, confessions contrary to the principle of justice, and fruit of poisonous tree and repeated confession, which may not be strictly corresponds to the rules of strict exclusion, relative exclusion and discretionary exclusion. In fact, the boundaries between the above-mentioned types are still very fuzzy, and it is a doctrine of coping with shifting rules by sticking to a changeless principle, to stick to the voluntariness theory, the kernel of exclusionary rules of oral confession.
      번역하기

      Whether it’s because of the case condition, adjustive measures to local conditions, or even further refinement rules or legislation followed suit, in pursuit of certainty for application of the exclusionary rules of oral confession from uncertainty ...

      Whether it’s because of the case condition, adjustive measures to local conditions, or even further refinement rules or legislation followed suit, in pursuit of certainty for application of the exclusionary rules of oral confession from uncertainty of the legislation the precedent , the principles of the I ching can provide us the effective tool with a grasp of the change trend of the illegal confession exclusionary rules’ text and the model of judicial practice.It is because the eternal pursuit of justice, that exclusionary rules of oral confession have started from scratch, and developed from few to many in text and practice. Exclusionary rule of oral confession in different periods of history, regions, procedural stages as well as the concrete objects also has a different form of its expression. Illegally-obtained confession can be type into 4 kinds such as non-voluntary confessions, illegally-obtained confessions, confessions contrary to the principle of justice, and fruit of poisonous tree and repeated confession, which may not be strictly corresponds to the rules of strict exclusion, relative exclusion and discretionary exclusion. In fact, the boundaries between the above-mentioned types are still very fuzzy, and it is a doctrine of coping with shifting rules by sticking to a changeless principle, to stick to the voluntariness theory, the kernel of exclusionary rules of oral confession.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 摘要
      • Ⅰ. 交易之源 : 口供排除规则的正义追求
      • Ⅱ. 变易之形 : 口供排除规则的形式流变
      • Ⅲ. 简易之理 : 非法口供及其排除规则的类型分析
      • Ⅳ. 不易之道 : 口供排除规则理论的任意性内核
      • 摘要
      • Ⅰ. 交易之源 : 口供排除规则的正义追求
      • Ⅱ. 变易之形 : 口供排除规则的形式流变
      • Ⅲ. 简易之理 : 非法口供及其排除规则的类型分析
      • Ⅳ. 不易之道 : 口供排除规则理论的任意性内核
      • 参考文献
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 宋远升, "非法证据排除规则的虚化与实化——以法律实用主义为指导的证据排除规则的出路" 1 : 2017

      2 陆而启, "非法证据排除规则个案解释的逻辑倒错" 2 : 2015

      3 吴洪淇, "转型的逻辑——证据法的运行环境与内部结构" 中国政法大学出版社 2013

      4 卡尔, "资本论" 重庆出版社 2014

      5 李学灯, "证据法比较研究" 五南图书出版公司 1992

      6 艾伦, "英国证据法实务指南(第四版)" 中国法制出版社 2012

      7 约书亚, "美国刑事诉讼法精解 : 第2卷⋅刑事审判(第4版)" 北京大学出版社 2009

      8 王兆鹏, "美国刑事诉讼法 第2版" 北京大学出版社 2014

      9 阿克希尔, "美国刑事诉讼中的辩护" 法律出版社 249-, 2001

      10 罗纳尔多, "美国刑事诉讼-法律与实践" 武汉大学出版社 2006

      1 宋远升, "非法证据排除规则的虚化与实化——以法律实用主义为指导的证据排除规则的出路" 1 : 2017

      2 陆而启, "非法证据排除规则个案解释的逻辑倒错" 2 : 2015

      3 吴洪淇, "转型的逻辑——证据法的运行环境与内部结构" 中国政法大学出版社 2013

      4 卡尔, "资本论" 重庆出版社 2014

      5 李学灯, "证据法比较研究" 五南图书出版公司 1992

      6 艾伦, "英国证据法实务指南(第四版)" 中国法制出版社 2012

      7 约书亚, "美国刑事诉讼法精解 : 第2卷⋅刑事审判(第4版)" 北京大学出版社 2009

      8 王兆鹏, "美国刑事诉讼法 第2版" 北京大学出版社 2014

      9 阿克希尔, "美国刑事诉讼中的辩护" 法律出版社 249-, 2001

      10 罗纳尔多, "美国刑事诉讼-法律与实践" 武汉大学出版社 2006

      11 王进喜, "美国〈联邦证据规则〉条解(2011年重塑版)" 中国法制出版社 2012

      12 达马斯卡, "漂移的证据法" 中国政法大学出版社 2003

      13 浙江省高级人民法院, "浙刑再字第2 号判决书"

      14 劳伦斯, "法官语言" 法律出版社 2007

      15 布洛克, "法国刑事诉讼法(原书第21版)" 中国政法大学出版社 2009

      16 孙长永, "沉默权制度研究" 法律出版社 2001

      17 陆声俊, "民间绝学智库《易经》答疑百问(第1-40问)"

      18 慈继伟, "正义的两面 (修订版)" 生活⋅读书⋅新知三联书店 2014

      19 南怀瑾, "易经系传别讲(第2版)" 复旦大学出版社 2002

      20 南怀瑾, "易经杂说(第2版)" 复旦大学出版社 2002

      21 王兆鹏, "新刑诉⋅新思维" 元照出版公司 2004

      22 托马斯, "德国刑事诉讼程序" 中国政法大学出版社 2004

      23 孙长永, "审判阶段非法证据排除问题实证考察" 1 : 2014

      24 萨德卡特, "审判的历史" 当代中国出版社 2009

      25 吴纪奎, "口供供需失衡与刑讯逼供" 4 : 2010

      26 张培鸿, "刑诉未老先衰的证据规则"

      27 刘仁文, "刑讯逼供 : 冤假错案的罪魁祸首" 9 : 2013

      28 易延友, "刑事诉讼法:规则、 原理与应用 (第4版)" 法律出版社 2013

      29 田口守一, "刑事诉讼法(第5版)" 2010

      30 伟恩, "刑事诉讼法 (上册)" 中国政法大学出版社 2003

      31 理查德, "刑事证据" 法律出版社 2007

      32 艾明, "从德国证据禁止理论看两个证据规定的进步与不足" 2 : 2014

      33 舒国滢, "从司法的广场化到司法的剧场化——一个符号学的视角" 3 : 1999

      34 陈瑞华, "从‘证据学’走向‘证据法学’——兼论刑事证据法的体系和功能" 3 : 2006

      35 全国人民代表大会常务委员会法制工作委员会, "中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法释义(最新修正版)" 法律出版社 2012

      36 王士帆, "不自证己罪原则" 国立政治大学法学系 2004

      37 吴继奎, "三元化递进式的自白排除法则——自白排除法则的比较法考察" 2 : 2011

      38 "Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U. S. 471"

      39 J. Bentham, "Treatise on Evidence"

      40 John H. Langbein, "Torture and Plea Bargaining" 46 (46): 1978

      41 Stephen Greer, "The Right to Silence: A Review of the Current Debate" 53 (53): 709-, 1990

      42 John H. Langbein, "The Historical Origins of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination at Common Law" 92 (92): 1047-, 1994

      43 John Henry Wigmore, "Students’ Textbook"

      44 "Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U. S. 298"

      45 John Henry Wigmore, "Evidence in Trials at Common Law , Vol. 8"

      46 Alex W. Skoropat, "Evidence - Admissions - Preliminary Hearing on Voluntary Character of Admission Not Required in Criminal Cases" 16 (16): 1940

      47 John Henry Wigmore, "Evidence" 817-820, 1923

      48 Susan Klein, "Enduring Principles and Current Crises in Constitutional Criminal Procedure" 24 (24): 533-, 1999

      49 "Dickerson v. United States, 530 U. S. 428"

      50 J. Bentham, "Cofessions, Truth, and the Law" U. of Mich. Press 1993

      51 Richard D. Friedman, "Anchors and Flotsam: Is Evidence Law “Adrift”? Evidence Law Adrift by Mirjan R. Damaška Review" 107 (107): 1921-1967, 1998

      52 E.H. Levi, "An Introduction to Legal Reasoning" University of Chicago Press 1949

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.34 0.34 0.32
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.31 0.31 0.412 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼