The Usefulness of the Korean Version of Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Screening Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective Excessive worry about minor matters and a state in which this worry is experienced as uncontrollable are known to be keysymptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Given the importance of pathological worry in GAD, the need for psychometricallysound measures of this construct has increased. The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the Korean version ofPenn State Worry Questionnaire (K-PSWQ) for screening GAD.
Methods Two hundred and forty six patients were initially screened, from which 102 GAD patients and 118 patients with anxiety disordernot otherwise specified (anxiety disorder NOS) were finally enrolled. Patients were diagnosed by a structured clinical interview forthe DSM-IV Axis I. We also enrolled 114 control subjects who had no medical or psychiatric history. Pathological worry in both patientsand control subjects were assessed at baseline using the PSWQ and we estimated optimal cutoff score by the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) analysis.
Results We found that in the first ROC analysis, a score of 53 could simultaneously optimize sensitivity and specificity in order to discriminateGAD patients from control subjects. From the second receiver operating characteristic analysis, when both sensitivity andspecificity were optimized, we can suggest a score of 61 as being the cutoff for differentiating GAD patients from patients with anxietydisorder NOS.
Conclusion The Korean version of PSWQ is a useful method for screening GAD patients, although ethnic and cultural differencesmay affect the cutoff score of PSWQ for GAD.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective Excessive worry about minor matters and a state in which this worry is experienced as uncontrollable are known to be keysymptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Given the importance of pathological worry in GAD, the need for psychometricallysound measures of this construct has increased. The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the Korean version ofPenn State Worry Questionnaire (K-PSWQ) for screening GAD.
Methods Two hundred and forty six patients were initially screened, from which 102 GAD patients and 118 patients with anxiety disordernot otherwise specified (anxiety disorder NOS) were finally enrolled. Patients were diagnosed by a structured clinical interview forthe DSM-IV Axis I. We also enrolled 114 control subjects who had no medical or psychiatric history. Pathological worry in both patientsand control subjects were assessed at baseline using the PSWQ and we estimated optimal cutoff score by the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) analysis.
Results We found that in the first ROC analysis, a score of 53 could simultaneously optimize sensitivity and specificity in order to discriminateGAD patients from control subjects. From the second receiver operating characteristic analysis, when both sensitivity andspecificity were optimized, we can suggest a score of 61 as being the cutoff for differentiating GAD patients from patients with anxietydisorder NOS.
Conclusion The Korean version of PSWQ is a useful method for screening GAD patients, although ethnic and cultural differencesmay affect the cutoff score of PSWQ for GAD.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Bandelow B, "What is the threshold for symptomatic response and remission for major depressive disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder?" 67 : 1428-1434, 2006

2 Fresco DM, "Using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire to identify individuals with generalized anxiety disorder: a receiver operating characteristic analysis" 34 : 283-291, 2003

3 Hamilton M, "The assessment of anxiety states by rating" 32 : 50-55, 1959

4 Lim YJ, "The Penn State Worry Questionnaire:psychometric properties of the Korean version" 25 : E97-E103, 2008

5 American Psychiatric Association, "The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition" American Psychiatric Association 1987

6 Behar E, "Screening for generalized anxiety disorder using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: a receiver operating characteristic analysis" 34 : 25-43, 2003

7 Brown TA, "Psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in a clinical anxiety disorders sample" 30 : 33-37, 1992

8 Kessler RC, "Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication" 62 : 593-602, 2005

9 Meyer TJ, "Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire" 28 : 487-495, 1990

10 Behar E, "Current theoretical models of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): Conceptual review and treatment implications" 23 : 1011-1023, 2009

11 Hoge EA, "Cross-cultural differences in somatic presentation in patients with generalized anxiety disorder" 194 : 962-966, 2006

12 Borkovec TD, "Comprehensive Clinical Psychology" Pergamon 439-459, 1998

13 Zhu C, "Association of somatic symptoms with depression and anxiety in clinical patients of general hospitals in Guangzhou, China" 34 : 113-120, 2012

14 Beck AT, "An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties" 56 : 893-897, 1988

15 Rollman BL, "A randomized trial to improve the quality of treatment for panic and generalized anxiety disorders in primary care" 62 : 1332-1341, 2005

16 Yook SP, "A clinical sutdy on the Korean version of beck anxiety inventory: comparative study of patient and non-patient" 16 : 185-197, 1997