RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      공간관리 현황조사를 통한 대학시설관리방안에 관한 연구 - 국립대학의 사례를 중심으로 = A Study on the Facility Management Method through Actual Condition of Space Management - Based on the National University

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104193927

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      To enhance the administrational efficiency and for university facility and space management to be public, this research suggests a competent and an objective evaluation system and index. The study will assist national and university finances to contribute towards advanced education. Furthermore, figure out the space management condition of national university by utilizing the evaluation system, and through that suggesting efficient special management method.
      According to the result of this study, evaluation system for university facility can be widely divided into seven categories; system preparation, members conference, propriety of space allocation, propriety of management system, space use ratio, time control of space use, imposition index of surplus use. Based on these subdivisions, the space management category contains 19 evaluation items and the marking system allows perfect score of 100 points.
      In result of examining space management condition using the evaluation system, space management was well enforced in research focused university group where as in education centered university group, it shows relatively low enforcement. It also illustrated that efforts of evaluation items were required in categories of imposition index of surplus use and special use ratio in order for efficient space management.
      번역하기

      To enhance the administrational efficiency and for university facility and space management to be public, this research suggests a competent and an objective evaluation system and index. The study will assist national and university finances to contri...

      To enhance the administrational efficiency and for university facility and space management to be public, this research suggests a competent and an objective evaluation system and index. The study will assist national and university finances to contribute towards advanced education. Furthermore, figure out the space management condition of national university by utilizing the evaluation system, and through that suggesting efficient special management method.
      According to the result of this study, evaluation system for university facility can be widely divided into seven categories; system preparation, members conference, propriety of space allocation, propriety of management system, space use ratio, time control of space use, imposition index of surplus use. Based on these subdivisions, the space management category contains 19 evaluation items and the marking system allows perfect score of 100 points.
      In result of examining space management condition using the evaluation system, space management was well enforced in research focused university group where as in education centered university group, it shows relatively low enforcement. It also illustrated that efforts of evaluation items were required in categories of imposition index of surplus use and special use ratio in order for efficient space management.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      To enhance the administrational efficiency and for university facility and space management to be public, this research suggests a competent and an objective evaluation system and index. The study will assist national and university finances to contribute towards advanced education. Furthermore, figure out the space management condition of national university by utilizing the evaluation system, and through that suggesting efficient special management method.
      According to the result of this study, evaluation system for university facility can be widely divided into seven categories; system preparation, members conference, propriety of space allocation, propriety of management system, space use ratio, time control of space use, imposition index of surplus use. Based on these subdivisions, the space management category contains 19 evaluation items and the marking system allows perfect score of 100 points.
      In result of examining space management condition using the evaluation system, space management was well enforced in research focused university group where as in education centered university group, it shows relatively low enforcement. It also illustrated that efforts of evaluation items were required in categories of imposition index of surplus use and special use ratio in order for efficient space management.
      번역하기

      To enhance the administrational efficiency and for university facility and space management to be public, this research suggests a competent and an objective evaluation system and index. The study will assist national and university finances to contri...

      To enhance the administrational efficiency and for university facility and space management to be public, this research suggests a competent and an objective evaluation system and index. The study will assist national and university finances to contribute towards advanced education. Furthermore, figure out the space management condition of national university by utilizing the evaluation system, and through that suggesting efficient special management method.
      According to the result of this study, evaluation system for university facility can be widely divided into seven categories; system preparation, members conference, propriety of space allocation, propriety of management system, space use ratio, time control of space use, imposition index of surplus use. Based on these subdivisions, the space management category contains 19 evaluation items and the marking system allows perfect score of 100 points.
      In result of examining space management condition using the evaluation system, space management was well enforced in research focused university group where as in education centered university group, it shows relatively low enforcement. It also illustrated that efforts of evaluation items were required in categories of imposition index of surplus use and special use ratio in order for efficient space management.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이화룡, "효율적 대학 공간관리를 위한 공간비용채산제도의 역할" 15 (15): 89-, 2008

      2 건설교통부, "친경건축물(Green Building) 인증제도(공동 주택, 주거복합, 업무용)" 2002

      3 "좋은건축물지정제도 도입방안 연구" 행정중심복합도시건설청 2007

      4 류지성, "대학혁신과 경쟁력 연구보고서" 삼성경제연구소 2006

      5 "대학혁신과 경쟁력" 삼성경제연구소 2006

      6 교육인적자원부, "대학특성화 추진방안" 2005

      7 유수훈, "대학시설관리를 위한 평가분류체계 및 평가항목 개발 연구" 한국교육시설학회 15 (15): 22-29, 2008

      8 교육과학기술부, "대학시설공간의 효율적 활용에 관한 평가지표개발연구" 2008

      9 교육인적자원부, "대학시설공간의 효율적 활용에 관한 연구" 2007

      10 이현청, "대학 M&A 등 자율경영혁신모델연구" 교육인적자원부 2003

      1 이화룡, "효율적 대학 공간관리를 위한 공간비용채산제도의 역할" 15 (15): 89-, 2008

      2 건설교통부, "친경건축물(Green Building) 인증제도(공동 주택, 주거복합, 업무용)" 2002

      3 "좋은건축물지정제도 도입방안 연구" 행정중심복합도시건설청 2007

      4 류지성, "대학혁신과 경쟁력 연구보고서" 삼성경제연구소 2006

      5 "대학혁신과 경쟁력" 삼성경제연구소 2006

      6 교육인적자원부, "대학특성화 추진방안" 2005

      7 유수훈, "대학시설관리를 위한 평가분류체계 및 평가항목 개발 연구" 한국교육시설학회 15 (15): 22-29, 2008

      8 교육과학기술부, "대학시설공간의 효율적 활용에 관한 평가지표개발연구" 2008

      9 교육인적자원부, "대학시설공간의 효율적 활용에 관한 연구" 2007

      10 이현청, "대학 M&A 등 자율경영혁신모델연구" 교육인적자원부 2003

      11 이화룡, "국립대학 시설 및 공간의 효율적 관리에 관한 연구" 한국교육시설학회 15 (15): 21-32, 2008

      12 "공간비용채산제" 경상대학교 2006

      13 Kren L. Cyros, "Postsecondary Education Fcilities Inventory and Classification Manual(FICM)"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2022-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.33 0.33 0.43
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.41 0.36 1.002 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼