RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      50, 60년대 신문의 언론 자유 논증에 대한 담화 연구 = A discourse study for argumentation on freedom of speech in the South Korean newspapers in 1950-1960s

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105813765

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study analyzed the meaning and argumentation of the freedom of speech appearing in the editorials and columns of the Kyeonghyang Newspaper and the Dong-A Daily Newspaper from 1948 to 1962. In the South Korean society, the discussions on this era, in which the democratic republic was commenced, conceptualized the meaning of the freedom of speech, and had a large effect on today’s perception on the freedom of speech. This paper analyzed the discussions by using practical argumentation, which is one of methods used recently for critical discourse studies. At the time, the freedom of speech was not sufficiently guaranteed, and the system and laws that can guarantee it were not in place yet. The discourses of the freedom of speech showed complex aspects whereby amidst argumentations claiming the guarantee of the freedom of speech, arguments for restricting it were intersecting. Furthermore, other arguments such as fairness of journalism, journalist ethics, or national security were met. Through this analysis, we can understand how today’s perception on the freedom of speech was formed. For a long time, the freedom of speech was perceived narrowly in the media’s freedom and norms. The disappearance of arguments since 1960s left large tracks by taking opportunities away from the society for discussion and reasoning on the freedom of speech, rather than the freedom of speech itself. Hence, the freedom of speech will not be recovered in the state of disappeared oppression only. A greater freedom of everyone will be completely obtained through debates on the arguments that restricted the freedom, and more fierce reasoning for the fairness.
      번역하기

      This study analyzed the meaning and argumentation of the freedom of speech appearing in the editorials and columns of the Kyeonghyang Newspaper and the Dong-A Daily Newspaper from 1948 to 1962. In the South Korean society, the discussions on this era,...

      This study analyzed the meaning and argumentation of the freedom of speech appearing in the editorials and columns of the Kyeonghyang Newspaper and the Dong-A Daily Newspaper from 1948 to 1962. In the South Korean society, the discussions on this era, in which the democratic republic was commenced, conceptualized the meaning of the freedom of speech, and had a large effect on today’s perception on the freedom of speech. This paper analyzed the discussions by using practical argumentation, which is one of methods used recently for critical discourse studies. At the time, the freedom of speech was not sufficiently guaranteed, and the system and laws that can guarantee it were not in place yet. The discourses of the freedom of speech showed complex aspects whereby amidst argumentations claiming the guarantee of the freedom of speech, arguments for restricting it were intersecting. Furthermore, other arguments such as fairness of journalism, journalist ethics, or national security were met. Through this analysis, we can understand how today’s perception on the freedom of speech was formed. For a long time, the freedom of speech was perceived narrowly in the media’s freedom and norms. The disappearance of arguments since 1960s left large tracks by taking opportunities away from the society for discussion and reasoning on the freedom of speech, rather than the freedom of speech itself. Hence, the freedom of speech will not be recovered in the state of disappeared oppression only. A greater freedom of everyone will be completely obtained through debates on the arguments that restricted the freedom, and more fierce reasoning for the fairness.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 연구방법과 대상
      • 3. 언론 자유의 논증 전개 양상
      • 4. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 연구방법과 대상
      • 3. 언론 자유의 논증 전개 양상
      • 4. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼