RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      An Analysis of Korean EFL Writers’ Errors in the Use of Cohesive Devices

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104924412

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study examines Korean EFL writers’ errors in the use of cohesive devices. The participants were two groups of college students. One group consisted of 34 students, and the other group 23 students. The participants in each group were asked to write an opinion paper on a different issue. Analysis of data focused on the errors made in the use of five features of cohesive devices: use of junction words, transition between sentences/ideas, use of equivalent words/paraphrases, introduction of new information in appropriate places/manners, and use of accurate punctuation marks. According to the result, the participants showed weaknesses in dealing with the cohesive devices in English writing, making most errors in making a smooth transition without a junction word and least errors in using an equivalent word/phrase. Based on the result, the study concludes that Korean EFL writers need a systematic practice in the use of cohesive devices, especially in making a smooth transition between sentences/ideas either with or without the use of a junction word. Some pedagogical suggestions are made to improve the cohesive quality of Korean students’ English writing.
      번역하기

      This study examines Korean EFL writers’ errors in the use of cohesive devices. The participants were two groups of college students. One group consisted of 34 students, and the other group 23 students. The participants in each group were asked to wr...

      This study examines Korean EFL writers’ errors in the use of cohesive devices. The participants were two groups of college students. One group consisted of 34 students, and the other group 23 students. The participants in each group were asked to write an opinion paper on a different issue. Analysis of data focused on the errors made in the use of five features of cohesive devices: use of junction words, transition between sentences/ideas, use of equivalent words/paraphrases, introduction of new information in appropriate places/manners, and use of accurate punctuation marks. According to the result, the participants showed weaknesses in dealing with the cohesive devices in English writing, making most errors in making a smooth transition without a junction word and least errors in using an equivalent word/phrase. Based on the result, the study concludes that Korean EFL writers need a systematic practice in the use of cohesive devices, especially in making a smooth transition between sentences/ideas either with or without the use of a junction word. Some pedagogical suggestions are made to improve the cohesive quality of Korean students’ English writing.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Kang, Jennifer Yusun, "Written narratives as an index of L2 competence in Korean EFL learners" 14 (14): 259-279, 2005

      2 Nguyen, L. T. C., "Written fluency improvement in a foreign language" 6 (6): 707-730, 2015

      3 McCulley, G. A., "Writing quality, coherence, and cohesion" 19 (19): 269-282, 1985

      4 Cumming, A., "Writing expertise and second language proficiency" 39 : 81-141, 1989

      5 강애진, "What a TBI Case Offers to College-Level L2 Learners" 한국영어교육학회 68 (68): 3-27, 2013

      6 Carduner, J., "Using classroom assessment techniques to improve foreign language composition courses" 35 (35): 543-553, 2002

      7 Silva, T., "Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing : The ESL research and its implications" 27 (27): 657-677, 1993

      8 He, L., "Topical knowledge and ESL writing" 29 (29): 443-464, 2012

      9 Grabe, W., "Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistics perspective" Longman 1996

      10 Chen, C. W., "The use of conjunctive adverbials in the academic papers of advanced Taiwanese EFL learners" 11 (11): 330-345, 2006

      1 Kang, Jennifer Yusun, "Written narratives as an index of L2 competence in Korean EFL learners" 14 (14): 259-279, 2005

      2 Nguyen, L. T. C., "Written fluency improvement in a foreign language" 6 (6): 707-730, 2015

      3 McCulley, G. A., "Writing quality, coherence, and cohesion" 19 (19): 269-282, 1985

      4 Cumming, A., "Writing expertise and second language proficiency" 39 : 81-141, 1989

      5 강애진, "What a TBI Case Offers to College-Level L2 Learners" 한국영어교육학회 68 (68): 3-27, 2013

      6 Carduner, J., "Using classroom assessment techniques to improve foreign language composition courses" 35 (35): 543-553, 2002

      7 Silva, T., "Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing : The ESL research and its implications" 27 (27): 657-677, 1993

      8 He, L., "Topical knowledge and ESL writing" 29 (29): 443-464, 2012

      9 Grabe, W., "Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistics perspective" Longman 1996

      10 Chen, C. W., "The use of conjunctive adverbials in the academic papers of advanced Taiwanese EFL learners" 11 (11): 330-345, 2006

      11 Yang, W., "The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels" 23 (23): 31-48, 2012

      12 Harklau, L., "The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition" 11 (11): 329-350, 2002

      13 Geva, E., "The role of conjunctions in L2 text comprehension" 26 (26): 731-747, 1992

      14 Yetiş, V. A., "The role of composing process and coherence/cohesion in EFL writing" 13 (13): 336-351, 2017

      15 Williams, J., "The potential role(s)of writing in second language development" 21 (21): 321-331, 2012

      16 Green, C. F., "The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts : a corpus-based inquiry" 19 (19): 99-113, 2000

      17 Chiang, S., "The importance of cohesive conditions to perceptions of writing ability at the early stages of foreign language learning" 31 (31): 471-484, 2003

      18 Millis, K. K., "The impact of connectives on the memory for expository texts" 7 (7): 317-339, 1993

      19 Hubert, M. D., "The development of speaking and writing proficiencies in the Spanish language classroom" 46 (46): 88-95, 2010

      20 Crossley, S. A., "The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality" 32 (32): 1-16, 2016

      21 김성애, "The Quality of Language Input as Revealed in Teacher Talks and Classroom Activities" 현대영어교육학회 8 (8): 85-106, 2007

      22 배지영, "The Effects of the Process-Genre Approach on Korean EFL University Students’ Writing Abilities" 한국영어교과교육학회 16 (16): 1-25, 2017

      23 Kim, Yanghee, "Teaching Korean university writing class : Balancing the process and the genre approach" 7 (7): 1-15, 2005

      24 Davies, P., "Success in English teaching" Oxford University Press 2000

      25 Aktas, R. N., "Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing" 7 (7): 3-14, 2008

      26 Zhang, L. J., "Second language writing as and for second language learning" 22 (22): 446-447, 2013

      27 Matsuda, P. K., "Response: What is second language writing – And why does it matter?" 22 (22): 448-450, 2013

      28 한은희, "Research and Practice in Learning Portfolio Adoption on College Writing: A Case Study" 한국외국어교육학회 19 (19): 79-97, 2012

      29 Cimasko, T., "Principles and practices in foreign language writing instruction : The 2008 symposium on second language writing" 18 (18): 209-213, 2009

      30 Guo, L., "Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples : A comparison study" 18 (18): 218-238, 2013

      31 신정아, "Overpassivization Errors in Korean College Students’ English Writings" 한국응용언어학회 27 (27): 255-273, 2011

      32 McNamara, D. S., "Linguistic features of writing quality" 27 (27): 57-86, 2010

      33 Pica, T., "Language learners’interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2learners?" 30 (30): 59-84, 1996

      34 유현정, "L2 Writing Practice as Consciousness-Raising for Korean College Students" 한국영어교육학회 67 (67): 77-94, 2012

      35 Kent Lee, "Korean ESL Learners’ Use of Connectors in English Academic Writing" 팬코리아영어교육학회 25 (25): 81-103, 2013

      36 박용예, "Korean College EFL Students’ Use of Contrastive Conjunctions in Argumentative Writing" 한국영어교육학회 68 (68): 55-77, 2013

      37 Reichelt, M., "Key issues in foreign language writing" 45 (45): 22-41, 2012

      38 de Beaugrande, R., "Introduction to text linguistics" Longman 1981

      39 Eskey, D. E., "Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning" Lawrence Erlbaum 563-579, 2005

      40 Cox, B. E., "Good and poor elementary readers’ use of cohesion in writing" 25 (25): 47-65, 1990

      41 Hyland, K., "Genre and second language writing" University of Michigan Press 2004

      42 Snyder, D. W., "Foreign language writing fellows programs : A model for improving advanced writing skills" 49 (49): 750-771, 2016

      43 Dovey, T., "Facilitating writing from sources : A focus on both process and product" 9 (9): 45-60, 2010

      44 최재호, "Does Peer Feedback Affect L2 Writers’ L2 Learning, Composition Skills, Metacognitive Knowledge, and L2 Writing Anxiety?" 한국영어교육학회 68 (68): 187-213, 2013

      45 Granger, S., "Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English" 15 (15): 17-27, 1996

      46 Mohammed, A. S., "Conjunctions as cohesive devices in the writings of English as second language learners" 208 : 74-81, 2015

      47 Jafarpur, A., "Cohesiveness as a basis for evaluating compositions" 19 (19): 459-465, 1991

      48 Neuner, J., "Cohesive ties and chains in good and poor freshman essays" 21 (21): 92-105, 1987

      49 Zhang, M., "Cohesive features in exploratory writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities" 31 (31): 61-93, 2000

      50 Liu, M., "Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates" 33 (33): 623-636, 2005

      51 Majdeddin, K., "Cohesive devices in students’ IELTS writing tasks" 4 (4): 91-98, 2010

      52 Halliday, M. A. K., "Cohesion in English" Longman 1976

      53 Johnson, D. P., "Cohesion and coherence in composition in Malay and English" 23 (23): 1-17, 1992

      54 Todd, R. W., "Coherence, cohesion and comments on students’ academic essays" 12 (12): 10-25, 2007

      55 Shakir, A., "Coherence in EFL student-written texts : Two perspectives" 24 (24): 399-411, 1991

      56 Palmer, J. C., "Coherence and cohesion in the English language classroom : The use of lexical reiteration and pronominalisation" 30 (30): 61-85, 1999

      57 배정수, "Cognitive Strategy Use in L2 Argumentative and Narrative Writing of Korean College Students" 한국응용언어학회 29 (29): 193-231, 2013

      58 김성애, "Characteristics of Korean High School Students’ Summary Writing of English Reading Texts" 한국응용언어학회 32 (32): 89-118, 2016

      59 Chiang, S., "Assessing grammatical and textual features in L2 writing samples : The case of French as a foreign language" 83 (83): 219-232, 1999

      60 Jung Wan Yoon, "An Error Analysis of English Conjunctive Adjuncts in Korean College Students’ Writing" 한국영어교육학회 66 (66): 225-244, 2011

      61 Connor, U., "A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing" 17 (17): 301-316, 1984

      62 Khalil, A., "A study of cohesion and coherence in Arab EFL college students’writing" 17 (17): 359-371, 1989

      63 Yvette, F., "A comparison of internet conjunctive cohesion in the English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English" 23 (23): 15-28, 1992

      64 윤현숙, "A Corpus-based Analysis of Connectors in Korean Students' Essay Writing" 한국응용언어학회 22 (22): 159-178, 2006

      65 이은주, "A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Korean EFL Learners' Use of Conjunctive Adverbials" 한국영어교육학회 59 (59): 283-302, 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.53 0.53 0.6
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.6 0.64 0.983 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼