RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Improving Custody Dispute Negotiation: Empirical Testing of the Equality Principle

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O112920548

      • 저자
      • 발행기관
      • 학술지명
      • 권호사항
      • 발행연도

        2020년

      • 작성언어

        -

      • Print ISSN

        1531-2445

      • Online ISSN

        1744-1617

      • 등재정보

        SCOPUS;ESCI

      • 자료형태

        학술저널

      • 수록면

        1049-1060   [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]

      • 구독기관
        • 전북대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 성균관대학교 중앙학술정보관  
        • 부산대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 전남대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 제주대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 중앙대학교 서울캠퍼스 중앙도서관  
        • 인천대학교 학산도서관  
        • 숙명여자대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 서강대학교 로욜라중앙도서관  
        • 계명대학교 동산도서관  
        • 충남대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 한양대학교 백남학술정보관  
        • 이화여자대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 고려대학교 도서관  
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Equality Principle (EP) is a novel idea to motivate parents litigating in custody disputes to negotiate. The EP is designed for a special but common case in which both parents are individually fit, there are no decisive differences between the two...

      The Equality Principle (EP) is a novel idea to motivate parents litigating in custody disputes to negotiate. The EP is designed for a special but common case in which both parents are individually fit, there are no decisive differences between the two households that the parents live in, but the conflict between the parents is so infected that the children's well‐being is threatened and shared custody must be ruled out. The present paper empirically tested the Equality Principle in its higher bidder version. In this version, both parents are first told that the conditions for the EP are met. Then, both parents are asked how much visitation they would allow the other parent, assuming that they would win sole custody and living. The most generous parent is awarded custody and living, along with a dictum to facilitate the promised amount of visitation. In the present model (PM), the offered amount of visitation has no functional effect on the custody dispute because the judges and jurors award custody as well as the amount of visitation. A within‐subjects vignette experiment measured 52 participants’ levels of visitation generosity in the EP and the PM. Participants showed significantly higher visitation generosity in the EP compared to the PM. The results are discussed in terms of representation of the present model, an equal amount of visitation offered, ecological validity, child perspective, and appellant's rights. In conclusion, the present paper showed that the EP is a promising strategy to resolve seemingly unresolvable custody disputes.
      Practitioner's Key Points:
      The longer the custody dispute, the more children suffer. The Equality Principle encourages swift resolution which helps children.
      The Equality Principle is designed to resolve custody litigations where both parents are fit by making them compete in visitation generosity.
      The Equality Principle has at least two versions; randomization and highest bidder of visitation time wins. Highest bidder is probably more plausible for the general public.
      Empirical evidence shows that the Equality Principle in the highest bidder wins variant is a promising strategy to quickly resolve high conflict custody disputes with fit parents.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼