RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      남한과 유엔의 북한지역 점령정책 구상과 통치 ― 타협과 현실의 괴리 ― = UN and the ROK’s Military Administration in the Occupied Area of North Korea, 1950

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104143736

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the Implementation of the Military Administration in North Korea during the Korean War. Before the final settlement on the issue of the military administration in the North Korean area between the RO...

      The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the Implementation of the Military Administration in North Korea during the Korean War. Before the final settlement on the issue of the military administration in the North Korean area between the ROK government and the UN, the occupied area was extended, and both the ROK government and the UN independently pursued military administration. In early October, the ROK Government detached its police order. From the beginning, the military administration in North Korea was carried out differently in the eastern and western areas in terms of system and operational procedure.
      In the western area, dual systems of military administration were maintained by both sides as the US and the ROK forces occupied the important areas including P’yongyang; in the eastern area, the ROK forces took the initiative in the military administration as they advance across the 38th Parallel on October 1 and occupied the critical areas in advance while the UN forces landed in and occupied Hamkyong Province about one month later. The ROK forces thus proclaimed martial law in the northern part of Korea and set up a civil affairs bureau of martial law enforcement forces and appointed the chief of the bureau in each province.
      The friction and confrontation in the process of starting the military administration between the ROK and the UN forces was submerged since the ROK government accepted the “October 12 Resolution” of the UN and thus recognized the UN sovereignty over the occupied area. Thus, the ROK government ceased its activities to lead the military administration, and those self-ruling committees, self-defense forces, and the police organizations were absorbed by authorities of the US military administration under its command. As the institutions for the UN military administration were organized in the P’yongannam-do area, a part of those police forces and administrative personal were incorporated into the organ of the UN administration, but the rest returned to the south.
      Finally, the basic nature of the UN military administration in maintaining the self-rule under its command turned out to be a formality. However, the basis of the residents’ daily life depended upon the self-ruling committees, police, self-defense forces or security guard composed of the mature youth organized for each unit. Situations varied according to the region, but various social organizations, such as the YMCA, the Korea Youth Association, the Northwest Youth Association, and others were set up for active participation in the occupied area.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the Implementation of the Military Administration in North Korea during the Korean War. Before the final settlement on the issue of the military administration in the North Korean area between the RO...

      The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the Implementation of the Military Administration in North Korea during the Korean War. Before the final settlement on the issue of the military administration in the North Korean area between the ROK government and the UN, the occupied area was extended, and both the ROK government and the UN independently pursued military administration. In early October, the ROK Government detached its police order. From the beginning, the military administration in North Korea was carried out differently in the eastern and western areas in terms of system and operational procedure.
      In the western area, dual systems of military administration were maintained by both sides as the US and the ROK forces occupied the important areas including P’yongyang; in the eastern area, the ROK forces took the initiative in the military administration as they advance across the 38th Parallel on October 1 and occupied the critical areas in advance while the UN forces landed in and occupied Hamkyong Province about one month later. The ROK forces thus proclaimed martial law in the northern part of Korea and set up a civil affairs bureau of martial law enforcement forces and appointed the chief of the bureau in each province.
      The friction and confrontation in the process of starting the military administration between the ROK and the UN forces was submerged since the ROK government accepted the “October 12 Resolution” of the UN and thus recognized the UN sovereignty over the occupied area. Thus, the ROK government ceased its activities to lead the military administration, and those self-ruling committees, self-defense forces, and the police organizations were absorbed by authorities of the US military administration under its command. As the institutions for the UN military administration were organized in the P’yongannam-do area, a part of those police forces and administrative personal were incorporated into the organ of the UN administration, but the rest returned to the south.
      Finally, the basic nature of the UN military administration in maintaining the self-rule under its command turned out to be a formality. However, the basis of the residents’ daily life depended upon the self-ruling committees, police, self-defense forces or security guard composed of the mature youth organized for each unit. Situations varied according to the region, but various social organizations, such as the YMCA, the Korea Youth Association, the Northwest Youth Association, and others were set up for active participation in the occupied area.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 온만금, "한국전쟁시 한국과 유엔의 북한 점령정책" 7 : 1992

      2 서용선, "한국전쟁시 북한 점령정책, In 한국전쟁 점령, 노무운용, 동원" 국방군사연구소 1995

      3 육군 군사연구소, "한국전쟁사료: 육본 전투명령" 육군본부 1995

      4 한모니까, "한국전쟁 전후 '수복지구'의 체제 변동 과정 : 강원도 인제군을 중심으로" 가톨릭대학교 대학원 2009

      5 국방부 정훈국, "한국전란 1년지"

      6 한모니까, "특집 : 한국전쟁기 미국의 북한 점령정책과 통치권 문제-평양과 양양 지역의 행정조직 구성 비교-" 한국역사연구회 78 (78): 161-193, 2010

      7 "조선일보"

      8 육군본부, "작전명령철(1950.7.25-12.20, HO00202)"

      9 "유원식·이선근·정일권·백선엽 등의 증언록"

      10 "서울신문"

      1 온만금, "한국전쟁시 한국과 유엔의 북한 점령정책" 7 : 1992

      2 서용선, "한국전쟁시 북한 점령정책, In 한국전쟁 점령, 노무운용, 동원" 국방군사연구소 1995

      3 육군 군사연구소, "한국전쟁사료: 육본 전투명령" 육군본부 1995

      4 한모니까, "한국전쟁 전후 '수복지구'의 체제 변동 과정 : 강원도 인제군을 중심으로" 가톨릭대학교 대학원 2009

      5 국방부 정훈국, "한국전란 1년지"

      6 한모니까, "특집 : 한국전쟁기 미국의 북한 점령정책과 통치권 문제-평양과 양양 지역의 행정조직 구성 비교-" 한국역사연구회 78 (78): 161-193, 2010

      7 "조선일보"

      8 육군본부, "작전명령철(1950.7.25-12.20, HO00202)"

      9 "유원식·이선근·정일권·백선엽 등의 증언록"

      10 "서울신문"

      11 라종일, "북한통치의 반성: 1950년 가을, In 탈냉전시대 한국전쟁 재조명" 한국전쟁학회 1998

      12 나종남, "북한지역 점령정책에 대한 평가: 한국과 미국의 갈등관계를 중심으로" 화랑대연구소 56 (56): 2000

      13 박명림, "북한의 붕괴와 남한의 통치, 1950년 가을, In 한국 1950: 전쟁과 평화" 나남 2002

      14 중앙일보사, "민족의 증언 3" 을유문화사 1972

      15 "동아일보"

      16 대한민국 국회, "국회속기록 제8회 42차"

      17 Thomas S, "Teraji in FEC History Section, Korean Conflict : A Collection of Historical Manuscripts on the Korean Campaign, History of the Korean War, VolumeⅢ(Civil Affairs, Civil Assistance Problems), 1952, MF48(MF는 군사편찬연구소 마이크로 필름 번호)"

      18 Chough Pyung Ok, "Home Minister to the UNCURK(4 Dec 1950). ROK Proposals to UNCURK regarding Unification(11 Dec 1950), A Supplementary Memorandum on the Same Subject Transmitted in Writing(11 Dec 1950), Seoul to Department of State, Dec 14, 1950, 357.AD/12-1450, SN.1457(SN은 군사편찬연구소 자료목록 번호)"

      19 "Department of State, Internal Affairs(1950.10-12); Civil Affsirs Directives(Telegrams& Memorandum), 1950-1954, RG 59, Central Files Decimal File 795A series(1950-1954)"

      20 "Department of State, FRUS, 1950, Vol.7."

      21 김명기, "50년 북한점령지역에 대한 미국의 안정정책" 한국군사학회 14 : 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.66 0.66 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.65 0.62 1.675 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼