사전 경관영향평가를 위한 조망점 위치결정에 관한 연구 : 골프장 사례로 = (A) Study on the Decision of Choosing Location of L.C.P for the L.I.A : A case of Golf Courses

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The interest for the Golf is rising with two reasons.
One is that the income of people is being increased. The other is that the desire for the leisure is diversified, as the wording "leisure" is enlarging its range.
As a result, running Golf courses are 194 as of Dec. 31th, 2005.
The 66% of national land is mountainous districts and, for the viewpoint of efficient land development, most of the Golf courses were formed on slope.
And It is the fact that this despoil the environment & the visual resource around.
"L.I.A", which is caused by development projects, is the prior evaluation system of the environment.
And it is one of the category of the evaluation in 'P.E.R.S’ & ‘E.I.A.
However it didn't go into effect well, because it was analyzed and evaluated in the way of formal and negative method.
Also, because of the character of the Landscape, it is not easy to apply the term or standard to the Landscape, after standardizing Landscape or stating the landscape in figures.
Because of the ambiguity of the concrete evaluation standard, the evaluation is based on the subjective recognition. And those make it impossible to calculate the absolute standard. So, the research and the evaluation in a lump are very hard.
Nowadays, "L.I.A" is achieved by field survey, the impact estimation owing to the project and progress of the decrease method.
For performing this, main point is as below : Target of the evaluation, The evaluator, The timing of the evaluation, The tool of evaluation, The category of the evaluation, The measure of the evaluation, Decrease method.
View Point is the spot where the object of the view can be seen.
Among the View Points, the dominant spot is selected as the " Landscape Control Point" which control, maintain and supervise the object of the view.
The Landscape Control Point is the essential factor of controlling the view, when evaluating the view. It is because the visual perception is influenced by the point where the evaluator see the object of the view.
For the selecting the L.C.P, universal spot in the region is usually chosen.
But there is not the absolute rule for the selecting the "universal spot", the choice has been made by the subjectivity of the evaluator.
For an example, there is not any report which states the standard or method of the selecting the Control point on the most of the Landscape Impact Statement.
This general practice might cause the totally sterilized report, as the report lacks the objectivity and objectivity expertise on the selecting the Landscape Control Point.
In the recognition of this problem, the purpose of this paper is to propose the objectified standard for the selecting the placement of the Control Point, as giving consequence according to the weight between the type of the Control Point.
AHP(Analytic Hierarchy process) method is applied, to propose the rational basis, and the result of the method is applied to the case of site.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = i
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 배경 = 1
• 2. 연구의 목적 = 2
• 3. 연구의 내용 및 수행과정 = 3
• 1) 연구의 내용 = 3
• 2) 연구의 수행과정 = 4
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
• 1. 선행 연구 = 5
• 1) 골프장 조성과 관련한 연구 = 5
• 2) 조망점과 관련한 연구 = 6
• 3) 경관평가와 관련한 연구 = 8
• 2. 관련법규의 고찰 = 11
• 1) 골프장 조성시의 입지기준 = 11
• 2) 경관영향평가의 현황 = 14
• 3) 자연경관영향심의제도의 도입 = 17
• 3. 사례 비교 = 18
• 1) 경관항목의 비교 = 18
• 2) 조망점 관련내용의 비교 = 21
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 24
• 1. 평가항목의 설정 = 24
• 1) 평가항목 추출 방법 = 24
• 2) 유형별 계층도 작성 = 26
• 2. 조망점 유형별 가중치 산정 = 27
• 1) AHP 기법을 이용한 가중치 선정 = 27
• 2) 일관성 검증 = 28
• 3) 전문가의 설문 = 29
• 3. 사례지 적용 = 30
• 1) 사례지 개요 = 30
• 2) 조사 방법 = 30
• Ⅳ. 조망점 선정의 객관화 기준 = 31
• 1. 조망점 유형의 추출결과 = 31
• 1) 조망지점의 범위의 설정 = 31
• 2) 조망점 선정을 위한 기본 원칙 = 32
• 3) 골프장 입지사례의 비교결과 = 33
• 2. AHP 분석결과 = 36
• 1) 일관성 지수 = 36
• 2) 분석결과 = 37
• 3) 결과의 종합 = 39
• Ⅴ. 사례지의 적용 = 41
• 1. 사례지 개요 = 41
• 1) 개황 = 41
• 2) 사업지구의 물리적 특성 = 42
• 2. 조망점 선정과정 = 42
• 1) 조망거리의 설정 = 43
• 2) 대상지 주변 토지이용 조사 = 43
• 3) 조망점의 선정 = 45
• 3. 조망점 선정결과 및 고찰 = 47
• 1) 조망점 선정결과 = 47
• 2) 사례지 적용의 시사점 및 한계점 = 48
• Ⅵ. 결론 = 49
• 참고문헌 = 52
• ABSTRACT = 56
• 부록 = 59