RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Views on Precision Medicine among Health Professionals in Korea: A Mixed Methods Study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106527263

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aimed to investigate awareness, attitudes, and perspectives on precision medicine among health professionals in Koreaand to identify issues that need to be addressed before implementing precision medicine. Mixed methods research was applied.
      For qualitative research, a semi-structured focus group interview was conducted with six health professionals. For quantitativeresearch, a self-reported survey was administered. A total of 542 health professionals participated in the survey, and 526completed the entire questionnaire. Health professionals showed positive attitudes toward precision medicine. About 95–96% ofrespondents agreed that precision medicine will be effective in treatment and precise diagnosis, and 69.9% reported that theywould participate as study subjects. Meanwhile, they expressed concerns regarding educating patients and health professionals inprecision medicine and developing research and data sharing infrastructure. Also, they emphasized the importance of developingprecision medicine in an equitable way. Despite varying levels of awareness of precision medicine, the health professionals expresseda willingness to engage in precision medicine research, and recommended that health professionals work closely with policymakersto design precision medicine in a way that can be effectively adopted. Health professionals showed had a positive, butcautious, attitude toward precision medicine. The results of this study suggest areas to be addressed before ushering in precisionmedicine in Korea.
      번역하기

      This study aimed to investigate awareness, attitudes, and perspectives on precision medicine among health professionals in Koreaand to identify issues that need to be addressed before implementing precision medicine. Mixed methods research was applied...

      This study aimed to investigate awareness, attitudes, and perspectives on precision medicine among health professionals in Koreaand to identify issues that need to be addressed before implementing precision medicine. Mixed methods research was applied.
      For qualitative research, a semi-structured focus group interview was conducted with six health professionals. For quantitativeresearch, a self-reported survey was administered. A total of 542 health professionals participated in the survey, and 526completed the entire questionnaire. Health professionals showed positive attitudes toward precision medicine. About 95–96% ofrespondents agreed that precision medicine will be effective in treatment and precise diagnosis, and 69.9% reported that theywould participate as study subjects. Meanwhile, they expressed concerns regarding educating patients and health professionals inprecision medicine and developing research and data sharing infrastructure. Also, they emphasized the importance of developingprecision medicine in an equitable way. Despite varying levels of awareness of precision medicine, the health professionals expresseda willingness to engage in precision medicine research, and recommended that health professionals work closely with policymakersto design precision medicine in a way that can be effectively adopted. Health professionals showed had a positive, butcautious, attitude toward precision medicine. The results of this study suggest areas to be addressed before ushering in precisionmedicine in Korea.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 National Library of Medicine (US), "What is the precision medicine initiative?"

      2 Ashley EA, "The precision medicine initiative : a new national effort" 313 : 2119-2120, 2015

      3 Moon S, "Success strategy of precision medicine" 15 : 14-32, 2016

      4 Pritchard DE, "Strategies for integrating personalized medicine into healthcare practice" 14 : 141-152, 2017

      5 NHS Scotland, "Scottish Medicines Consortium"

      6 The Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Promoting personalized medical care and securing future growth engines through the Ministry of Health and Welfare and Precision Medicine"

      7 Mountcastle-Shah E, "Primary care physicians’ perceptions of barriers to genetic testing and their willingness to participate in research" 94 : 409-416, 2000

      8 Mirnezami R, "Preparing for precision medicine" 366 : 489-491, 2012

      9 Larry Jameson J, "Precision medicine—personalized, problematic, and promising" 70 : 612-614, 2015

      10 Asano H., "Personalized and precision medicine in Japan. Asia Health Policy Program working paper #43" Stanford University 2017

      1 National Library of Medicine (US), "What is the precision medicine initiative?"

      2 Ashley EA, "The precision medicine initiative : a new national effort" 313 : 2119-2120, 2015

      3 Moon S, "Success strategy of precision medicine" 15 : 14-32, 2016

      4 Pritchard DE, "Strategies for integrating personalized medicine into healthcare practice" 14 : 141-152, 2017

      5 NHS Scotland, "Scottish Medicines Consortium"

      6 The Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Promoting personalized medical care and securing future growth engines through the Ministry of Health and Welfare and Precision Medicine"

      7 Mountcastle-Shah E, "Primary care physicians’ perceptions of barriers to genetic testing and their willingness to participate in research" 94 : 409-416, 2000

      8 Mirnezami R, "Preparing for precision medicine" 366 : 489-491, 2012

      9 Larry Jameson J, "Precision medicine—personalized, problematic, and promising" 70 : 612-614, 2015

      10 Asano H., "Personalized and precision medicine in Japan. Asia Health Policy Program working paper #43" Stanford University 2017

      11 Keogh B., "Personalised medicine strategy: NHS England board"

      12 Bonter K, "Personalised medicine in Canada : a survey of adoption and practice in oncology, cardiology and family medicine" 1 : e000110-, 2011

      13 Vorderstrasse A, "Perceptions of personalized medicine in an academic health system : educational findings" 3 : 14-19, 2015

      14 Johnson RB, "Mixed methods research : a research paradigm whose time has come" 33 : 14-26, 2004

      15 Lévy Y, "Genomic medicine 2025 : France in the race for precision medicine" 388 : 2872-, 2016

      16 Juengst E, "From"personalized"to"precision"medicine : the ethical and social implications of rhetorical reform in genomic medicine" 46 : 21-33, 2016

      17 Cyranoski D, "China embraces precision medicine on a massive scale" 529 : 9-10, 2016

      18 McGrath S, "Building towards precision medicine : empowering medical professionals for the next revolution" 9 : 23-, 2016

      19 Stanek EJ, "Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians : results of a nationwide survey" 91 : 450-458, 2012

      20 Collins FS, "A new initiative on precision medicine" 372 : 793-795, 2015

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지등록 한글명 : Yonsei Medical Journal
      외국어명 : Yonsei Medical Journal
      KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.42 0.3 0.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.83 0.72 0.546 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼