RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    行政責任의 性質과 基準 = Characteristics and Criteria in Administrative Responsibility

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45019185

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is mainly to study the characteristics of responsiblity and its criteria in public administration. As the people's demand for the administration continue to increase, The administration is in a position to play a role deeply related to pelple's rights and interests.
    The contents of administration become complicated, specialized and techniclized in modern administrative strates.
    In many cases, the need of discretion power has been recognized in public administration to deal effectively with most administrative affairs. The stronger and the more concentrated the power of administrative discretion, the greater the misuse of its power.
    So adminiistrative responsibility become more important. Some characteristics in the Administrative responsibility are as follows. First Administrative responsibility is discussed and evaluated on the precondition of given obligation and discretion of administrators. Second, Most propriety in administrative responsibility depend upon our resonable understanding of the problems of cause and effect. Thired, A responsible administrator should carry out the public interest.
    Scholars have emphasized various criteria of administrative responsibility in democratic countries, but people-focused responsibility is on major goal of public administration.
    It is necessary for administrators to investigate and recognize the priority or the different weight among the criteria of responsibility sush as the effectiveness, the efficiency, the responsiveness, Social equity, citizen's participation and people's benefits in public administration.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is mainly to study the characteristics of responsiblity and its criteria in public administration. As the people's demand for the administration continue to increase, The administration is in a position to play a role deeply ...

    The purpose of this paper is mainly to study the characteristics of responsiblity and its criteria in public administration. As the people's demand for the administration continue to increase, The administration is in a position to play a role deeply related to pelple's rights and interests.
    The contents of administration become complicated, specialized and techniclized in modern administrative strates.
    In many cases, the need of discretion power has been recognized in public administration to deal effectively with most administrative affairs. The stronger and the more concentrated the power of administrative discretion, the greater the misuse of its power.
    So adminiistrative responsibility become more important. Some characteristics in the Administrative responsibility are as follows. First Administrative responsibility is discussed and evaluated on the precondition of given obligation and discretion of administrators. Second, Most propriety in administrative responsibility depend upon our resonable understanding of the problems of cause and effect. Thired, A responsible administrator should carry out the public interest.
    Scholars have emphasized various criteria of administrative responsibility in democratic countries, but people-focused responsibility is on major goal of public administration.
    It is necessary for administrators to investigate and recognize the priority or the different weight among the criteria of responsibility sush as the effectiveness, the efficiency, the responsiveness, Social equity, citizen's participation and people's benefits in public administration.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 間題의 提起 및 硏究目的
    • Ⅱ. 行政責任의 性質
    • 1. 行政人의 義務와 責任
    • 2. 行政人의 裁量과 責任
    • 3. 因果關係와 行政人의 責任
    • Ⅰ. 間題의 提起 및 硏究目的
    • Ⅱ. 行政責任의 性質
    • 1. 行政人의 義務와 責任
    • 2. 行政人의 裁量과 責任
    • 3. 因果關係와 行政人의 責任
    • 4. 公益의 實現과 行政人의 責任
    • Ⅲ. 行政責任의 基準
    • 1. 責任基準의 必要性과 行政的 價値 및 規範
    • 2. 責任基準에 대한 學者들의 見解
    • Ⅳ. 行政責任의 基準으로서의 價値問題의 變遷
    • 1. 美國의 行政 및 責任의 基準이 되는 價値問題
    • 2. 카나다와 韓國의 行政責任의 基準이 되는 價値問題
    • Ⅴ. 結論
    • 參考文獻
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼