RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      왜 플라톤을 번역하는가? 르네상스 플라톤주의자 피치노의 대답 = Why Translate Plato? The Answer of the Renaissance Platonist Ficino

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100727986

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Marsilio Ficino is considered to be a central figure of the Florentine Academy, who contributed to the revival of Platonism in the Renaissance by translating Plato’s complete works and other major Platonists’ writings into Latin. But why did he translate Plato and his followers? The aim of this paper is to elucidate what kind of Platonism Ficino tried to revive and why. For this purpose, I draw attention in particular to the ‘prefaces’ of his translations, commentaries or treatises. Ficino’s prefaces show the objectives and intentions of his publications and the meaning and the role which he attributed to Platonism. We begin with a brief look at the main features of Renaissance humanism which forms a background to Ficino’s Platonism. In this connection, we consider what he understood by ‘humanitas’, a key concept of Renaissance humanism. We then turn to Ficino’s prefaces and some other writings, which lead to the conclusion that the Platonism sought by Ficino is a ‘pious philosophy’ or theology, even a philosophical religion. In order to elaborate this interpretation, we first clarify the conceptions of ‘prisca theologia’ and ‘common religion’, which Ficino used to situate Platonism in the tradition of pagan religion. Next, we investigate how Ficino, as both a Platonist and a Christian, conceived of the relationship between Platonism and Christianity. It is shown that Ficino found in Platonism a philosophical means for preparing ‘intelligent’ people for Christianity. Yet, in his attempt to appropriate Platonism in a Christian way, he seemed eventually to Platonize his own vision of Christianity.
      번역하기

      Marsilio Ficino is considered to be a central figure of the Florentine Academy, who contributed to the revival of Platonism in the Renaissance by translating Plato’s complete works and other major Platonists’ writings into Latin. But why did he tr...

      Marsilio Ficino is considered to be a central figure of the Florentine Academy, who contributed to the revival of Platonism in the Renaissance by translating Plato’s complete works and other major Platonists’ writings into Latin. But why did he translate Plato and his followers? The aim of this paper is to elucidate what kind of Platonism Ficino tried to revive and why. For this purpose, I draw attention in particular to the ‘prefaces’ of his translations, commentaries or treatises. Ficino’s prefaces show the objectives and intentions of his publications and the meaning and the role which he attributed to Platonism. We begin with a brief look at the main features of Renaissance humanism which forms a background to Ficino’s Platonism. In this connection, we consider what he understood by ‘humanitas’, a key concept of Renaissance humanism. We then turn to Ficino’s prefaces and some other writings, which lead to the conclusion that the Platonism sought by Ficino is a ‘pious philosophy’ or theology, even a philosophical religion. In order to elaborate this interpretation, we first clarify the conceptions of ‘prisca theologia’ and ‘common religion’, which Ficino used to situate Platonism in the tradition of pagan religion. Next, we investigate how Ficino, as both a Platonist and a Christian, conceived of the relationship between Platonism and Christianity. It is shown that Ficino found in Platonism a philosophical means for preparing ‘intelligent’ people for Christianity. Yet, in his attempt to appropriate Platonism in a Christian way, he seemed eventually to Platonize his own vision of Christianity.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 나우어트, C. G, "휴머니즘과 르네상스 유럽문화" 혜안 2002

      2 부르크하르트, J, "이탈리아 르네상스의 문화" 한길사 2003

      3 송유례, "신(神)을 향한 에로스 - 플로티누스의 철학적 신비주의" 한국서양고전학회 51 (51): 71-106, 2013

      4 크리스텔러, P. O, "르네상스의 사상과 그 원천" 계명대학교 출판부 1995

      5 Euler, W. A, "“Pia philosophia” et “docta religio”: Theologie und Religion bei Marsilio Ficino und Giovanni Pico della Mirandola" Fink 1998

      6 Zintzen, C, "Ψυχή - Seele - anima. Festschrift für Karin Alt zum 7. Mai 1998" Stuttgart/Leipzig 417-435, 1998

      7 Allen, M. J. B, "Synoptic Art. Marsilio Ficino on the History of Platonic Interpretation" Leo S. Olschki Editore 1998

      8 Kristeller, P. O, "Renaissance Thought and the Arts" Princeton University Press 1990

      9 Petrarca, Francesca, "Prose" Ricciardi 1955

      10 Tambrun, B, "Pléton. Le Retour de Platon" Vrin 2006

      1 나우어트, C. G, "휴머니즘과 르네상스 유럽문화" 혜안 2002

      2 부르크하르트, J, "이탈리아 르네상스의 문화" 한길사 2003

      3 송유례, "신(神)을 향한 에로스 - 플로티누스의 철학적 신비주의" 한국서양고전학회 51 (51): 71-106, 2013

      4 크리스텔러, P. O, "르네상스의 사상과 그 원천" 계명대학교 출판부 1995

      5 Euler, W. A, "“Pia philosophia” et “docta religio”: Theologie und Religion bei Marsilio Ficino und Giovanni Pico della Mirandola" Fink 1998

      6 Zintzen, C, "Ψυχή - Seele - anima. Festschrift für Karin Alt zum 7. Mai 1998" Stuttgart/Leipzig 417-435, 1998

      7 Allen, M. J. B, "Synoptic Art. Marsilio Ficino on the History of Platonic Interpretation" Leo S. Olschki Editore 1998

      8 Kristeller, P. O, "Renaissance Thought and the Arts" Princeton University Press 1990

      9 Petrarca, Francesca, "Prose" Ricciardi 1955

      10 Tambrun, B, "Pléton. Le Retour de Platon" Vrin 2006

      11 Albertini, T, "Philosophers of the Renaissance" The Catholic University of America Press 82-91, 2010

      12 Schmitt, C. B, "Perennial Philosophy: From Aogstino Steuco to Leibniz" 27 : 505-532, 1966

      13 Dodds, E. R, "Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety" Cambridge University Press 1965

      14 Plotin, "Opera omnia, vol. 1" Clarendon Press 1835

      15 Ficino, Marsilio, "Opera omnia, 2 Bde" Phénix éditions 2000

      16 Haanegraaff, W. J, "New Age Religion and Western Culture" Brill 1996

      17 Field, A, "Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy" Brill 359-376, 2002

      18 Lauster, J, "Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy" Brill 45-69, 2002

      19 Levi, A, "Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy" Brill 99-113, 2002

      20 김영선, "M.피치노의 사랑론: De amore 를 중심으로" 한국가톨릭철학회 (4) : 128-146, 2002

      21 Gilson, E, "Les idées et les lettres" Vrin 1955

      22 Saffrey, H. D, "Le Néoplatonism après Plotin" Vrin 277-293, 2000

      23 Toussaint, S, "Humanismes, Antihumanismes. De Ficin à Heidegger. Tome 1" Les Belles Lettres 2008

      24 Copenhaver, B. P, "Hermetica" Cambridge University Press 1992

      25 Cassirer, E, "Ficino’s Place in Intelletual History" 6 : 483-501, 1945

      26 Kristeller, P. O, "Die Philosophie des Marsilio Ficino" Klostermann 1972

      27 Stroh, W, "Der Ursprung des Humanitätsdenkens in der Römischen Antike"

      28 Niethammer, F. I, "Der Streit des Philanthropinismus und Humanismus in der Theorie des Erziehungs-Unterrichts unsrer Zeit" Frommann 1808

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-07 학회명변경 영문명 : Seoul National University Institute of Humanities -> Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University KCI등재
      2015-01-06 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Seoul National University the Journal of Humanites -> Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.71 0.71 0.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.68 0.62 1.317 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼