RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      유방암에서 신보강화학요법 후 잔류암에 대한 유방촬영술, 유방초음파, 유방자기공명영상의 정확성의 비교 = Comparison of the Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasonography and MRI for Evaluating Residual Tumor after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104532736

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: The purpose of our study was to determine the relative accuracy of mammography, ultrasonography and MRI for evaluating residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, as compared with the pathological results. Materials and M...

      Purpose: The purpose of our study was to determine the relative accuracy of mammography, ultrasonography and MRI for evaluating residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, as compared with the pathological results.
      Materials and Methods: From December 2004 through August 2005, 13 patients who had mammography, ultrasonography and MRI performed for evaluating tumor response were enrolled in our study from a total of 47 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The therapy response was defined by ultrasonography that was able to compare the images taken before and after therapy, and each imaging was retrospectively analyzed by two board-certified radiologists who specialized in breast imaging. The presence or absence of residual tumor was investigated and the tumor measurement according to the imaging was divided into underestimating, being equal to or overestimating the size of the residual tumor, compared with that of the pathological results. The relative accuracy of these modalities was then assessed.
      Results: Eight of 13 patients showed a partial response and 5 patients showed stable lesion. Agreement rates about the residual tumor, as measured by mammography, ultrasonography and MRI and then compared with the pathological results, were 39%, 54% and 77%, respectively. Of the three methods, MRI agreed with the pathological results significantly more often, but it may overestimate (8%) or underestimate (15%) (p = 0.102). When there was disagreement with the pathological results, mammography exhibited a tendency to underestimate (38%) and ultrasonography exhibited a tendency to overestimate (31%).
      Conclusion: MRI had a higher relative accuracy than did mammography and ultrasonography for evaluating the residual tumor in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. However, MRI may overestimate (8%) or underestimate (15%) the residual tumor.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      목적: 신보강화학요법을 받은 유방암 환자의 잔류암 진단에 있어 유방촬영술, 유방초음파, 유방자기공명영상의 상대적 정확성을 병리 결과와 비교하여 알아보고자 하였다. 대상과 방법: 2004...

      목적: 신보강화학요법을 받은 유방암 환자의 잔류암 진단에 있어 유방촬영술, 유방초음파, 유방자기공명영상의 상대적 정확성을 병리 결과와 비교하여 알아보고자 하였다.
      대상과 방법: 2004년 12월부터 2005년 8월까지 신보강화학요법을 받은 총 47명의 유방암 환자 중 치료 반응을 보기 위해 유방촬영술, 유방초음파, 유방자기공명영상을 모두 시행한 13명을 대상으로 하였다. 치료 반응은 치료 전후의 영상 비교가 가능했던 초음파검사 소견으로 판정하였고, 각각의 영상은 후향적으로 두 명의 유방 영상전문의에 의해 분석되었다. 영상에서 잔류암의 존재 여부 및 측정된 잔류암의 크기를 병리결과와 비교하여 과소측정, 일치, 과대측정으로 나누었고 각각의 검사 방법들의 상대적 정확성을 알아보았다.
      결과: 총 13명 중 8명은 부분 반응을 보였고, 5명은 안정 병변을 보였다. 잔류암을 진단하는 데 있어 유방촬영술, 유방초음파, 유방자기공명영상 소견을 병리 결과와 비교했을 때 일치율은 각각 39%, 54%, 77%였다. 유방자기공명영상의 경우 다른 두 검사에 비해 통계적으로 유의하게 일치율이 높았지만 과대측정(8%)되거나 과소측정(15%)될 수 있었다 (p=0.102). 일치하지 않는 경우, 유방촬영술은 과소측정되는 경향이 있었고(38%), 초음파는 과대측정되는 경향이 있었다(31%).
      결론: 신보강화학요법을 받은 유방암 환자에서 잔류암을 진단하는 데 있어 자기공명영상은 과대측정(8%)되거나 과소측정(15%)될 수 있으나 유방촬영술과 초음파에 비해 상대적 정확도가 높았다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Booser DJ, "Treatment of locally advanced breastcancer" 19 : 278-285, 1992

      2 Haran EF, "Tamoxifen enhances cell death in implanted MCF7 breast cancerby inhibiting endothelium growth" 54 : 5511-5514, 1994

      3 Herrada J, "Relative value of physical examination,mammog-raphy,and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primarytumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receivingneoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma" Clin Cancer Res 3 : 1565-1569, 1997

      4 Yeh E, "Prospective comparison of mammography,sonography,and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy forpalpable breast cancer" 184 : 868-877, 2005

      5 Cocconi G, "Problems in evaluating response of primary breast cancer to sys-temic therapy" 4 : 309-313, 1984

      6 Bonadonna G, "Primary chemotherapy in operable breast can-cer.eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute" 16 : 93-100, 1998

      7 Therasse P, "New guidelines to evaluate the response totreatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Researchand Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the UnitedStates, National Cancer Institute of Canada" 92 : 205-216, 2000

      8 Swain SM, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the combined modalityapproach of locally advanced nonmetastatic breast cancer" 47 : 3889-3894, 1987

      9 James K, "Measuring response in solid tumors:unidimen-sional versus bidimensional measurement" 91 : 523-528, 1999

      10 von Minckwitz G, "Maximized reduction of primary breast tu-mor size using preoperative chemotherapy with doxorubicin anddocetaxel" 17 : 1999-2005, 1999

      1 Booser DJ, "Treatment of locally advanced breastcancer" 19 : 278-285, 1992

      2 Haran EF, "Tamoxifen enhances cell death in implanted MCF7 breast cancerby inhibiting endothelium growth" 54 : 5511-5514, 1994

      3 Herrada J, "Relative value of physical examination,mammog-raphy,and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primarytumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receivingneoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma" Clin Cancer Res 3 : 1565-1569, 1997

      4 Yeh E, "Prospective comparison of mammography,sonography,and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy forpalpable breast cancer" 184 : 868-877, 2005

      5 Cocconi G, "Problems in evaluating response of primary breast cancer to sys-temic therapy" 4 : 309-313, 1984

      6 Bonadonna G, "Primary chemotherapy in operable breast can-cer.eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute" 16 : 93-100, 1998

      7 Therasse P, "New guidelines to evaluate the response totreatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Researchand Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the UnitedStates, National Cancer Institute of Canada" 92 : 205-216, 2000

      8 Swain SM, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the combined modalityapproach of locally advanced nonmetastatic breast cancer" 47 : 3889-3894, 1987

      9 James K, "Measuring response in solid tumors:unidimen-sional versus bidimensional measurement" 91 : 523-528, 1999

      10 von Minckwitz G, "Maximized reduction of primary breast tu-mor size using preoperative chemotherapy with doxorubicin anddocetaxel" 17 : 1999-2005, 1999

      11 Moskovic EC, "Mammography in the assessment of response to medical treat-ment of large primary breast cancer" 47 : 339-344, 1993

      12 Rieber A, "MRI of breast cancer:influence of chemotherapy on sen-sitivity" 70 : 452-458, 1997

      13 Knopp MV, "MR-Mammographie zumMonitoring von neoadjuvanter Therapie beim Mammakarzinom" 35 : 1995

      14 Huber S, "Locally advanced breast carcinoma: computer assisted semi-quantitative analysis of color Doppler ultrasonography in the eval-uation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (work inprogress)" 19 : 601-607, 2000

      15 Londero V, "Locally advanced breast cancer: comparisonof mammography, sonography and MR imaging in evaluation ofresidual disease in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy" 14 : 1371-1379, 2004

      16 Brown LF, "Expression of vascular permeability factor(vascular endothelial growth factor)and its receptors in adenocarcinomas ofthe gastrointestinal tract" 53 : 4727-4735, 1993

      17 Fisher B, "Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome ofwomen with operable breast cancer" 16 : 2672-2685, 1998

      18 Montemurro F, "Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and sonography in pa-tients receiving primary chemotherapy for breast cancer" 15 : 1224-1233, 2005

      19 Vallone P, "Color-doppler using contrast medium in evaluatingthe response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally ad-vanced breast carcinoma" Anticancer Res 25 : 595-599, 2005

      20 Fornage BD, "Clinical,mammographic,andsonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size" 60 : 765-771, 1987

      21 American College of Radiology, "Breast imaging reporting and datasystem" American College of Radiology 2003

      22 Kedar RP, "Breast car-cinoma:measurement of tumor response to primary medical thera-py with color Doppler flow imaging" 190 : 825-830, 1994

      23 Segel MC, "Advanced primary breastcancer:assessment at mammography of response to inductionchemotherapy" 169 : 49-54, 1988

      24 Partridge SC, "Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancerin patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy" 179 : 1193-1199, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-11-24 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of The Korean Radiological Society -> Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology (JKSR) KCI등재
      2016-11-15 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Radiological Society -> The Korean Society of Radiology KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-09-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한방사선의학회지 -> 대한영상의학회지 KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.06 0.05 0.258 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼