RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Exploring the Practical Value of Business Games: Analysis with Toulmin’s Sensemaking Framework

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108442476

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      With the advances in technology and the trend towards increased computer-based experiential learning in education settings, business games are being increasingly used by business educators. This article utilizes Toulmin’s Sensemaking Framework to in...

      With the advances in technology and the trend towards increased computer-based experiential learning in education settings, business games are being increasingly used by business educators. This article utilizes Toulmin’s Sensemaking Framework to investigate the sensemaking process of business professionals to reveal how they consciously reason about the value of business games for learning complex business concepts and principles. Using the analysis of responses from 43 business professionals, our study identifies key areas where business professionals find value in business games and the limitations of using business games. First, business games are found to be an effective tool when teaching practical business skill sets to business professionals.
      Second, business games enhance the overall learning process in professional business training. Third, despite the advantages, some pitfalls in applying business games to practice are found. We also found sub-themes, claims, and argument patterns of how business professionals evaluate the value of business games through a grounded theory qualitative analysis method. Analysis results show several ground-warrant patterns exist in the arguments on values of business games including general principle – causal reasoning, personal experience – generalization, and personal projection – generalization. With these findings, we believe this paper contributes to the theory and practice of business game design, development, and the game playing and learning process.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference) 논문관계도

      1 Hirschheim, R, "Witty invention or dubious fad? Using argument mapping to examine the contours of management fashion" 22 (22): 60-84, 2012

      2 Breuer, J. S, "Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Eludamos" 4 (4): 7-24, 2010

      3 Tao, Y. H, "What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience" 53 (53): 929-939, 2009

      4 Strong, D. M, "Understanding organization—enterprise system fit : A path to theorizing the information technology artifact" 34 (34): 731-756, 2010

      5 Reginato, L, "Transfer of learning in accounting programs : The role of business games" 20 (20): 100592-, 2022

      6 Brockriede, W, "Toulmin on argument : An interpretation and application" 46 (46): 44-53, 1960

      7 Lin, Y. L, "The values of college students in business simulation game: A means-end chain approach" 58 (58): 1160-1170, 2012

      8 Piaget, J, "The third stage: The “secondary circular reactions” and the procedures destined to make interesting sights last" W W Norton & Co 1952

      9 Weick, K. E, "The social psychology of organizing" Addison-Wesley 1979

      10 Mayer, I, "The research and evaluation of serious games : Toward a comprehensive methodology" 45 (45): 502-527, 2013

      1 Hirschheim, R, "Witty invention or dubious fad? Using argument mapping to examine the contours of management fashion" 22 (22): 60-84, 2012

      2 Breuer, J. S, "Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Eludamos" 4 (4): 7-24, 2010

      3 Tao, Y. H, "What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience" 53 (53): 929-939, 2009

      4 Strong, D. M, "Understanding organization—enterprise system fit : A path to theorizing the information technology artifact" 34 (34): 731-756, 2010

      5 Reginato, L, "Transfer of learning in accounting programs : The role of business games" 20 (20): 100592-, 2022

      6 Brockriede, W, "Toulmin on argument : An interpretation and application" 46 (46): 44-53, 1960

      7 Lin, Y. L, "The values of college students in business simulation game: A means-end chain approach" 58 (58): 1160-1170, 2012

      8 Piaget, J, "The third stage: The “secondary circular reactions” and the procedures destined to make interesting sights last" W W Norton & Co 1952

      9 Weick, K. E, "The social psychology of organizing" Addison-Wesley 1979

      10 Mayer, I, "The research and evaluation of serious games : Toward a comprehensive methodology" 45 (45): 502-527, 2013

      11 Dodds, A. E, "The personal and the social : Mead’s theory of the ‘generalized other’" 7 (7): 483-503, 1997

      12 Cook, R. W, "The pedagogical efficacy of a sales management simulation" 16 (16): 37-46, 2006

      13 Pasin, F, "The impact of a simulation game on operations management education" 57 (57): 1240-1254, 2011

      14 Taylor, J. R, "The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface" Routledge 1999

      15 Ben-Zvi, T, "The efficacy of business simulation games in creating Decision Support Systems : An experimental investigation" 49 (49): 61-69, 2010

      16 Randel, J. M, "The effectiveness of games for educational purposes : A review of recent research" 23 (23): 261-276, 1992

      17 Fitó-Bertran, À, "The effect of competences on learning results an educational experience with a business simulator" 51 : 910-914, 2015

      18 Brockmyer, J. H, "The development of the game engagement questionnaire : A measure of engagement in video game-playing" 45 (45): 624-634, 2009

      19 Boden, D, "The business of talk" Polity Press 1994

      20 Toulmin, S. E, "The Uses of Argumen" Cambridge University Press 2003

      21 Heracleous, L. T, "The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse" Sage Publications 175-192, 2004

      22 Morse, J. M, "The SAGE handbook of grounded theory" Sage Publications Ltd 229-244, 2007

      23 Urquhart, C, "The SAGE handbook of grounded theory" Sage Publications Ltd 339-359, 2007

      24 Czarniawska, B, "The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse" Sage Publications 399-404, 2004

      25 Hays, R. T, "The Effectiveness of Instructional Games: A Literature Review and Discussion" Naval Air Warfare Center 2005

      26 Klabbers, J. H. G, "Terminological ambiguity : Game and simulation" 40 (40): 446-463, 2009

      27 Searle, J. R, "Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts" Academic Press 59-82, 1975

      28 Kim, J. B, "Study on the Use of Serious Games in Business Education (Doctoral dissertation)"

      29 Layder, D, "Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research" Sage 1998

      30 Ruben, B. D, "Simulations, games, and experience-based learning : The quest for a new paradigm for teaching and learning" 30 (30): 498-505, 1999

      31 Faria, A. J, "Simulation gaming for sales management training" 13 (13): 47-59, 1994

      32 Haapasalo, H, "Simulating business and operations management–a learning environment for the electronics industry" 73 (73): 261-272, 2001

      33 Rieber, L. P, "Seriously considering play : Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games" 44 (44): 43-58, 1996

      34 Susi, T, "Serious games: An overview" School of Humanities and Informatics, University of Skövde 2007

      35 Charles, T, "Serious games and edutainment applications" Springer 425-445, 2011

      36 Landers, R. N, "Serious games and edutainment applications" Springer 399-423, 2011

      37 Michael, D. R, "Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform" Thomson Course Technology 2006

      38 Abt, C. C, "Serious Games" University Press of America 1969

      39 Weick, K. E, "Sensemaking in Organizations" SAGE 1995

      40 McGonigal, J, "Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world" Penguim.com 2011

      41 Ritterfeld, U, "Playing Video Games. Motives, Responses, and Consequences" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 399-413, 2006

      42 Salas, E, "Performance measurement in simulation-based training : A review and best practices" 40 (40): 328-376, 2009

      43 Weick, K. E, "Organizing and the process of sensemaking" 16 (16): 409-421, 2005

      44 Alinier, G, "Nursing students’ and lecturers’perspectives of objective structured clinical examination incorporating simulation" 23 (23): 419-426, 2003

      45 Skinner, E. A, "Motivation in the classroom : Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year" 85 (85): 571-581, 1993

      46 Naceur, A, "Motivation and learning — The role of interest in construction of representation of text and long-term retention : Inter-and intraindividual analyses" 20 (20): 155-170, 2005

      47 Fletcher, K. E, "Mapping Strategic Thought" John Wiley and Sons 355-402, 1990

      48 Azadegan, A, "Lecture Notes in ComputerScience" Springer Berlin Heidelberg 74-85, 2012

      49 Gee, J. P, "Learning and Literacy" Peter Lang Publishing 2007

      50 Lainema, T, "Learn more, better and faster : Computer-based simulation gaming of production and operations" 7 (7): 34-59, 2005

      51 Robson, K, "Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification" 58 (58): 411-420, 2015

      52 MIT, "Institute-wide Task Force on the future of MIT education (Final Report)"

      53 Etzioni, A, "Humble decision making" 45-57, 2001

      54 Austin, J. L, "How to do things with words" Oxford University Press 1975

      55 Huizinga, J, "Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-element in Culture" Beacon Press 1955

      56 Hirschman, E. C, "Hedonic consumption : Emerging concepts, methods and propositions" 46 (46): 92-101, 1982

      57 Squire, K, "Harnessing the power of games in education" 3 (3): 5-33, 2003

      58 Brandão, J, "Handbook of Research on Serious Games as Educational, Business and Research Tools" Information Science Reference 182-201, 2012

      59 Gentry, J. W, "Guide to business gaming and experiential learning" Nichols/GP Publishing 9-20, 1990

      60 Corbin, J. M, "Grounded theory research : Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria" 13 (13): 3-21, 1990

      61 Rahn, D, "Getting real with experiential : Get your students launched in the very next entrepreneurship course you teach" 41 : 264-265, 2014

      62 Garris, R, "Games, motivation, and learning : A research and practice model" 33 (33): 441-467, 2002

      63 Kumar, R, "Games as an interactive classroom technique: Perceptions of corporate trainers, college instructors and students" 19 (19): 53-63, 2007

      64 Lewis, M. A, "Game playing and operations management education" 105 (105): 134-149, 2007

      65 Csikszentmihalyi, M, "Flow: The psychology of optimal experience" Harper Perennial 1991

      66 Hoberman, S, "Experiential management development: From learning to practice" Quorum Books 1992

      67 Kolb, D. A, "Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions" 1 : 227-247, 2001

      68 Boudreau, M. C, "Enacting integrated information technology : A human agency perspective" 16 (16): 3-18, 2005

      69 Dewey, J, "Education and experience" Simon and Schuster 1938

      70 Fu, F. L, "EGameFlow : A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games" 52 (52): 101-112, 2009

      71 Iverson, K. M, "E-Learning Games: Interactive Strategies for Digital Delivery" Prentice-Hall, Inc 2004

      72 Hernández-Lara, A. B, "Do business games foster skills? A cross-cultural study from learners’ views" 14 (14): 315-331, 2018

      73 Phillips, N, "Discourse and Institutions" 29 (29): 635-652, 2004

      74 Parker, I, "Discourse Dynamics (Psychology Revivals): Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology" Routledge 2004

      75 Van Eck, R, "Digital game-based learning : It’s not just the digital natives who are restless" 41 (41): 16-, 2006

      76 Prensky, M, "Digital Game-Based Learning" McGraw-Hill 2001

      77 Faria, A. J, "Developments in business gaming : A review of the past 40 years" 40 (40): 464-487, 2009

      78 Boland Jr, R. J, "Designing information technology to support distributed cognition" 5 (5): 456-475, 1994

      79 Charmaz, K, "Constructing Grounded Theory:A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis" Sage 2006

      80 Nickerson, R. S, "Confirmation bias : A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises" 2 (2): 175-220, 1998

      81 Grijalvo, M, "Computer-based business games in higher education : A proposal of a gamified learning framework" 178 : 121597-, 2022

      82 Batko, M, "Business Management Simulations-a detailed industry analysis as well as recommendations for the future" 3 (3): 47-65, 2016

      83 Corbin, J, "Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory" Sage Publications 2014

      84 Strauss, A, "Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory" Sage Publications, Inc 1998

      85 Berente, N, "Arguing the value of virtual worlds : Patterns of discursive sensemaking of an innovative technology" 35 (35): 685-709, 2011

      86 Billig, M, "Arguing and thinking : A rhetorical approach to social psychology" Cambridge University Press 1996

      87 Fairclough, N, "Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research" Psychology Press 2003

      88 Baker, A, "An experimental card game for teaching software engineering processes" 75 (75): 3-16, 2005

      89 Faria, A. J, "A survey of simulation game users, former-users, and never-users" 35 (35): 178-207, 2004

      90 Wouters, P, "A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games" 105 (105): 249-265, 2013

      91 Funk, J. B, "A biopsychosocial analysis of the video game-playing experience of children and adults in the United States" 6 (6): 1-15, 2006

      92 McGlarty, K. L, "A Literature Review of Gaming in Education. Pearson’s Research Reports"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      연관 공개강의(KOCW)

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼