RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    개혁신학과 자연과학 = Reformed Theology and Natural Sciences

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82494742

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Besides the doctrine of the Trinity, the newly hot-debated issue in post-modern times is the relation between theology and natural sciences. The most popular opinion is the conflict model. This position contends that there has been the war between natural sciences and theology or Christian faith. The other possible option is the independence model. This position holds that natural sciences and theology have their proper realms to deal with. The realms do not coincide with each other. Another possible alternative is the dialogue or consonance model. Natural sciences and theology have to help and listen to each other. They have something to learn from each other. Abraham Kuyper does not directly refer to the relation between natural sciences and theology but the Reformed position on sciences or disciplines in general. But we can deduce how to set up the correct relationship between Reformed theology and natural sciences. At least in Reformed theology it is not desirable to give an unconditional objection to natural sciences or to isolate them from theology. Of course it is not correct to accept everything in natural sciences. Neither is to refuse everything. We are to acknowledge "something" in natural sciences.
    번역하기

    Besides the doctrine of the Trinity, the newly hot-debated issue in post-modern times is the relation between theology and natural sciences. The most popular opinion is the conflict model. This position contends that there has been the war between nat...

    Besides the doctrine of the Trinity, the newly hot-debated issue in post-modern times is the relation between theology and natural sciences. The most popular opinion is the conflict model. This position contends that there has been the war between natural sciences and theology or Christian faith. The other possible option is the independence model. This position holds that natural sciences and theology have their proper realms to deal with. The realms do not coincide with each other. Another possible alternative is the dialogue or consonance model. Natural sciences and theology have to help and listen to each other. They have something to learn from each other. Abraham Kuyper does not directly refer to the relation between natural sciences and theology but the Reformed position on sciences or disciplines in general. But we can deduce how to set up the correct relationship between Reformed theology and natural sciences. At least in Reformed theology it is not desirable to give an unconditional objection to natural sciences or to isolate them from theology. Of course it is not correct to accept everything in natural sciences. Neither is to refuse everything. We are to acknowledge "something" in natural sciences.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 과학주의
    • 3. 과학주의의 몰락
    • 4. 자연과학과 신학의 관계
    • 5. 자연 과학에 대한 개혁신학의 자세
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 과학주의
    • 3. 과학주의의 몰락
    • 4. 자연과학과 신학의 관계
    • 5. 자연 과학에 대한 개혁신학의 자세
    • 6. 결론
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼