소비자계약의 해제시 사업자의 통상의 손해 = Ordinary damages of supplier in the event of rescission of the consumer contract

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper is about ordinary damages of supplier in the event of rescission of the consumer contract. The purpose of this paper lies in the study of the meaning, the range, and the proof of ordinary damages in the event of rescission of the consumer contract. References for the study are made from the related papers in South Korea and Japan.
This paper is composed in the following orders:
Firstly, I have researched on the meaning of ordinary damages on the rescission of general contracts and the scope of compensation for damage in the even of rescission of the consumer contract law based on § 399 of civil act, § 9 of installment transactions act, § 19 of act on the consumer protection in the electronic commerce transactions, etc. and § 10, §19, § 30 of door to door sales, etc. act - the related consumer contract law, the scope of compensation for damage by non-performance on contract is stated in § 389 of civil act no greater than the ordinary damage, and thus, the ordinary damage of the supplier in the even of rescission of consumer contract is the same concept as the ordinary damage on the civil act, but can be interpreted differently on the scope because of the unique characteristics of consumer contracts.
Secondly, enactment process of consumer contract law, contents and legal status of § 9 ① of consumer contract act and related problems has been inspected to look into in the average damage in the event of rescission of consumer contract in Japan. Especially, the meaning of average damage has been inspected and examined in relation with § 426 civil act in Japan in the chapter. In addition, study has also been made in the characteristics of average damage and recovery in the even of 해제 of consumer contract law through enactment process. One different point in Japan from South Korea is that consumer contract law is enacted and enforced.
Third, with one judicial precedent in Japan district court, I have looked into “real relationship" the summary of case and made the comment of case. The average damage occurs when the same kind of a consumer contract against many and unspecified consumers is rescinded and therefore, is similar in the meaning, but different in scope with the ordinary damage of the civil act.
Lastly, research has been made on the meaning, the scope, and the proof step of the ordinary damage of the supplier based on the consumer contract law, and the proposition has been made on the need of the unification of related articles, and the enactment of the one unified consumer contract law encompassing other consumer contracts. In addition, comment has been made on the regulations on the scope of the ordinary damage of the supplier based on the laws to be established, and the necessity of the enforcement of the regulations.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이은영, "채권총론" 박영사 2006

2 곽윤직, "채권총론" 박영사 2003

3 김용한, "채권법총론" 박영사 1988

4 김상용, "채권법총론" 법문사 2003

5 김형배, "채권각론" 박영사 1997

6 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2004

7 곽윤직, "채권각론" 박영사 2000

8 정종휴, "손해배상의 범위규정의 구조"

9 송덕수, "손해배상의 범위"

10 양삼승, "손해배상범위에 관한 기초적 연구" 서울대 1988

11 양창수, "민법입문" 박영사 1994

12 "대법원 2007.11.16. 선고 2005다55312 판결"

13 "대법원 2006.4.13. 선고 2005다75897 판결"

14 "대법원 2006.1.27. 선고 2005다16591,16607 판결"

15 "대법원 2004. 7. 22. 선고 2004다3543 판결"

16 "대법원 2003. 10. 23. 선고 2001다75295 판결"

17 "대법원 2001. 11. 30. 선고 2001다16432 판결"

18 能見善久, "違約金⋅損害賠償額の豫定とその規制(5⋅完)" 103 (103): 1986

19 內閣府國民生活局消費者企劃課, "逐條解說消費者契約法"

20 經濟産業星商務情報政策局消費經濟部消費經濟政策課編, "特定商去來に關する法律の解說" 經濟産業調査會 2004

21 山本敬三, "消費者契約法の意義と民法の課題" 123 (123): 2001

22 山本敬三, "消費者契約法と不當條項規制-第17次國民生活審議會消費者政策部會報告の檢討" (686) : 2000

23 潮見佳男, "消費者契約法⋅金融商品販賣法と金融取引" 經濟法令硏究會 2001

24 朝倉佳秀, "消費者契約法9條1号の規定する平均的損害の主張⋅立證責任する一考察-問題點檢の討裁判例の紹介" (1149) : 2004

25 山本豊, "消費者契約法9條1号にいう平均的損害の額" (1114) : 2003

26 落合誠一, "消費者契約法" 有斐閣 2002

27 森田宏樹, "消費者契約の解除に伴う平均的な損害と標準約款" 43 (43): 2003

28 谷川久, "割賦販賣契約の解除と損害賠償額の制限"

29 日本辯護士聯合消費者問題對策委員會, "コンメタ-ル消費者契約法"