RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The effect of needle size on cerebrospinal fluid collection time and post‐dural puncture headache: A retrospective cohort study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O105784291

      • 저자
      • 발행기관
      • 학술지명
      • 권호사항
      • 발행연도

        2021년

      • 작성언어

        -

      • Print ISSN

        0017-8748

      • Online ISSN

        1526-4610

      • 등재정보

        SCI;SCIE;SCOPUS

      • 자료형태

        학술저널

      • 수록면

        329-334   [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]

      • 구독기관
        • 전북대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 성균관대학교 중앙학술정보관  
        • 부산대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 전남대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 제주대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 중앙대학교 서울캠퍼스 중앙도서관  
        • 인천대학교 학산도서관  
        • 숙명여자대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 서강대학교 로욜라중앙도서관  
        • 충남대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 한양대학교 백남학술정보관  
        • 이화여자대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 고려대학교 도서관  
      • ⓒ COPYRIGHT THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD: ALL RIGHT RESERVED
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The main objective of this study was to compare cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection time and patient's discomfort between 20G (a)traumatic and 22G atraumatic needles.
      Risk of post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) is decreased using atraumatic needles. Smaller needles may give lower risk but possibly at the cost of increased CSF collection time (due to lower flow), leading to additional patient's discomfort.
      We performed a retrospective study of lumbar puncture data from a research program on CSF metabolomics and compared traumatic 20G (n = 210) with atraumatic 20G (n = 39) and 22G (n = 105) needles. In this cohort, incidence of PDPH was prospectively registered with other procedure details. Primary outcome was CSF collection time (time to fill the tube). Secondary outcomes were pain and stress scores during procedure, and incidence of PDPH.
      The time to collect 10 mL of CSF was longer for 22G needles (6.1 minutes; 95% CI 5.8–6.5) than for 20G traumatic (2.2 minutes; 95% CI 2.1–2.2) and 20G atraumatic needles (2.9 minutes; 95% CI 2.8–3.1). There were no differences in pain and stress scores. PDPH was lower for 22G atraumatic needles: odds ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.25–0.66) versus 20G traumatic needles and 0.53 (95% CI 0.40–0.69) versus 20G atraumatic needles. Absolute PDPH rates were 69/210 (32.9%) for 20G traumatic, 13/39 (33.3%) for 20G atraumatic, and 19/105 (18.1%) for 22G atraumatic needles.
      CSF collection time is slightly longer for smaller 22G needles, but this does not lead to more discomfort for the patient.
      번역하기

      The main objective of this study was to compare cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection time and patient's discomfort between 20G (a)traumatic and 22G atraumatic needles. Risk of post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) is decreased using atraumatic needles...

      The main objective of this study was to compare cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection time and patient's discomfort between 20G (a)traumatic and 22G atraumatic needles.
      Risk of post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) is decreased using atraumatic needles. Smaller needles may give lower risk but possibly at the cost of increased CSF collection time (due to lower flow), leading to additional patient's discomfort.
      We performed a retrospective study of lumbar puncture data from a research program on CSF metabolomics and compared traumatic 20G (n = 210) with atraumatic 20G (n = 39) and 22G (n = 105) needles. In this cohort, incidence of PDPH was prospectively registered with other procedure details. Primary outcome was CSF collection time (time to fill the tube). Secondary outcomes were pain and stress scores during procedure, and incidence of PDPH.
      The time to collect 10 mL of CSF was longer for 22G needles (6.1 minutes; 95% CI 5.8–6.5) than for 20G traumatic (2.2 minutes; 95% CI 2.1–2.2) and 20G atraumatic needles (2.9 minutes; 95% CI 2.8–3.1). There were no differences in pain and stress scores. PDPH was lower for 22G atraumatic needles: odds ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.25–0.66) versus 20G traumatic needles and 0.53 (95% CI 0.40–0.69) versus 20G atraumatic needles. Absolute PDPH rates were 69/210 (32.9%) for 20G traumatic, 13/39 (33.3%) for 20G atraumatic, and 19/105 (18.1%) for 22G atraumatic needles.
      CSF collection time is slightly longer for smaller 22G needles, but this does not lead to more discomfort for the patient.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼