CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상의 근원심 치축에 관한 연구

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구에서는 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)를 이용한 삼차원 영상을 기준으로 CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상 형성 시의 신뢰성을 입증하고 CBCT 삼차원 영상과 비교하여 실제 근원심 치축을 가장 잘 나타낼 수 있는 이차원 파노라마영상을 찾고자 하였다. 연구 모형은 두부계측방사선사진의 평균치에 따라 제작되었고 CBCT와 파노라마방사선영상 촬영을 위해 촬영 시마다 연구 모형이 반복적으로 재위치되었다. 파노라마방사선영상은 －5°, 0°, ＋5°로 연구 모형의 교합평면을 변화시키면서 촬영되었다. 이후 CBCT 삼차원 영상과 CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상 및 파노라마방사선영상에서 측정된 계측값을 평가하였다. CBCT 삼차원 영상과 CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상의 전치 및 견치부에서 통계학적으로 유의성 있는 차이를 나타내지 않았으나 대부분의 소구치부에서는 통계학적으로 유의성 있는 차이를 나타내었다. 그리고 CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상과 파노라마방사선영상은 대부분의 치아에서 통계학적으로 유의성 있는 차이를 나타내었다. CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상이 근원심 치축 평가 시 임상적으로 사용 가능함을 보여주었다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to confirm the reliability of a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated panoramic view based on a CBCT 3D image and to find the most helpful 2D panoramic image compared with CBCT 3D image when examining the mesiodistal tooth axis. Methods: A test model was constructed according to cephalometric norms. The test model was repeatedly repositioned for CBCT and panoramic radiographic imaging. Panoramic radiographs were acquired at each of the following 3 occlusal plane positions: －5°, 0°, and ＋5°. Measurements of mesiodistal tooth axis in CBCT 3D image, CBCT-generated panoramic view, and panoramic radiographs were compared. Results: Compared with the CBCT-generated panoramic view, CBCT 3D image showed significant difference in the mesiodistal tooth axis in the premolars and no significant difference in the mesiodistal tooth axis in the incisors and canines. Mesiodistal tooth axis on the CBCT-generated panoramic view was significantly different from that on panoramic radiographs. Conclusions: CBCT-generated panoramic view can be a useful tool for evaluating mesiodistal tooth axis.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 서론
• 연구방법
• 연구성적
• 고찰
• 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최갑림, "치아의 순(협)설 경사도 변화에 따라파노라마 방사선 사진에 나타난 치아 길이 및 각도 변화" 대한치과교정학회 37 (37): 114-124, 2007

2 전현상, "두부 위치 변화에 따른 파노라마 방사선사진상의 치축각도의 왜곡" 대한치과교정학회 38 (38): 240-251, 2008

3 Baba R, "Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging" 33 : 285-290, 2004

4 Mayoral G, "Treatment results with light wires studied by panoramic radiography" 81 : 489-497, 1982

5 Edwards JG, "The prevention of relapse in extraction cases" 60 : 128-144, 1971

6 Mckee IW, "The effect of vertical and horizontal head positioning in panoramic radiography on mesiodistal tooth angulations" 71 : 442-451, 2001

7 Philipp RG, "The cant of the occlusal plane and distortion in the panoramic radiograph" 48 : 317-323, 1978

8 Mckee IW, "The accuracy of 4 panoramic units in the projection of mesiodistal tooth angulations" 121 : 166-175, 2002

9 Lucchesi MV, "Suitability of the panoramic radiograph for assessment of mesiodistal angulation of teeth in the buccal segments of the mandible" 94 : 303-310, 1988

10 Scarfe WC, "Radiographic interproximal angulations: implications for rotational panoramic radiography" 76 : 664-672, 1993

11 Graber TM, "Postmortems in posttreatment adjustment" 52 : 331-352, 1966

12 Peck JL, "Mesiodistal root angulation using panoramic and cone beam CT" 77 : 206-213, 2007

13 Wyatt CC, "Imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment" 11 : 442-452, 1998

14 American Board of Orthodontics, "Grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs [CD-ROM]" St Louis 2002

15 Marmulla R, "Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT" 34 : 28-31, 2005

16 Xie Q, "Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study" 25 : 61-66, 1996

17 Garcia-Figueroa MA, "Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs" 134 : 93-99, 2008

18 Mischkowski RA, "Diagnostic quality of multiplanar reformations obtained with a newly developed cone beam device for maxillofacial imaging" 37 : 1-9, 2008

19 Frederiksen NL, "Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology" 80 : 540-554, 1995

20 Lam EW, "Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning" 74 : 42-46, 1995

21 Dewel BF, "Clinical observations on the axial inclination of teeth" 35 : 98-115, 1949

22 Ursi WJ, "Assessment of mesiodistal axial inclination through panoramic radiography" 24 : 166-173, 1990

23 Frykholm A, "Angular measurements in orthopantomography" 6 : 77-81, 1977

24 Samawi SS, "Angular distortion in the orthopantomogram" 11 : 100-107, 1984

25 Van Elslande D, "Accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation projected by cone- beam computed tomographic panoramic-like images" 137 (137): S94-99, 2010

26 Lou L, "Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review" 104 : 402-411, 2007

27 Stramotas S, "Accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at various positions in vitro" 24 : 43-52, 2002

28 Hatasaka HH, "A radiographic study of roots in extraction sites" 46 : 64-68, 1976

29 McNamara JA Jr, "A method of cephalometric evaluation" 86 : 449-469, 1984

30 Keim RG, "2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 3. More breakdowns of selected variables" 36 : 690-699, 2002