임플랜트 표면처리가 생체활성에 미치는 영향 = EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENTS TO INCREASE BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF DENTAL IMPLANT

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Statement of problem: Modification of titanium implant surface has potential to ensure clinically favorable performance that several surface modification technologies have been introduced. Among the methods. anodizing method and sol-gel hydroxyapatite coating method have gained much interest due to its roughness and chemical composition of the coating layer, but more of its biocompatibility result is required. Purpose : The purpose of this study was to compare bone-implant interface shear strength of four different surface treated implants as time elapsed. Resonance frequency analysis(RFA) and removal torque measurement methods were employed to measure implant stability at one week and six week after implantation. Material and method: A total of 80 screw-shaped implant [20 machined, 20 resorbable media blasted(RBM), 20 anodized, and 20 anodized+hydroxyapatite sol-gel coated] were prepared, and one of each group was implanted in the tibia of a New Zealand white rabbit that total 20 of them were used. In order to test the implant stability and implant-tissue interface contact changing in the bone bed, each 10 rabbit were sacrificed 1 week and 6 week later while resonance frequency and removal torque were measured. One-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test were used for statistical analysis. Results : The results were as follows. 1. There was no statistically significant difference of implant stability quotients(ISQ) value in RFA between individual groups after 1 week of implantation and 6 weeks(p>0.05). But, there was statistically significant increase of ISQ value in 6 weeks group compared to 1 week group(p<0.05). 2. There was no statistically significant difference in removal torque analysis between individual groups after 1 week of implantation and 6 weeks(p>0.05). but there was statistically significant increase in all 4 groups after 6 weeks compared to 1 week later(p<0.05). 3. There was no statistically significant difference in removal torque analysis between anodized group and HA coating after anodic oxidation 6 weeks later(p>0.05), but significant difference was appeared in both groups compared to RBM group and smooth-machined group(p<0.05). Conclusions : It can be suggested that changes in surface characteristics affect bone reactions. Anodized and anodized+hydroxyapatite sol-gel coating showed significantly improved bone tissue response to implants, but further study on the effect of hydroxyapatite dissolution is needed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "Titanium in medicine" Springer 2001

2 "Titanium alloys in to tal joint replacement A materials science perspective" 19 : 1621-1639, 1998

3 "The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation andgingivitis Shorttern observations" 11 : 169-178, 1996

4 "The evaluation ofthe removal torque and the histomor phometry of the CaP coating surface inrabbit tibia" 42 : 556-571, 2004

5 "The effect of partial coating with hydrox-yapaite on bone remodeling in relation toporous-coated titanium-alloy dental implantsin the dog" 1338-1345,

6 "The application ofresonance frequency measurements tostudy the stability of titanium implants dur-ing healing in the rabbit tibia" 8 : 234-243, 1997

7 "The ap-plicability of osseointegrated oral im-plants in the rehabilitation of partialedentulism A prospective multicenterstudy of 558 fixtures" 271-281, intjoralandmaxillofacimplants1990;5

8 "Stability measurements of a double threaded titanium implant design withturned or oxidized surface" 2 : 18-20, 2001

9 "Resonancefrequency analysis of implants with anodizedsurface oxides" 42 : 305-311, 2004

10 "Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo" 8 : 226-, 1997

11 "Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant tissue interface usingresonance frequency analysis" 7 : 261-, 1996

12 "On the clinical measure ment of implant stability and osseointe gration" Gothenburg University 1997

13 "On the bone response to oxidized titanium implants The role of microporous structure and chemical composition of the sulfide oxide in enhancedosseointegration thesis" Goteborg Univ 2002

14 "Mechanicaland histological investigation of hydrothermally treated and untreated anodictitanium oxide films containing Ca and P" 29 : 1459-1468, 1995

15 "Mapping implant stability byresonance frequency analysis" 24 : 191-, 1996

16 "Introduction to osseointe-gration Osseointegration in clinical dentistry" Branemark PI Quintessence Publishing Co 1986;11-76

17 "Integrationof screw implant in the rabbit A oneyear follow up of removal torque of titaniumimplants" 69-75, intjoralmaxillofacimplants1987;2

18 "Initial implant stability using differentimplant designs and surgical techniques" 2 : 6-8, 2001

19 "Influenceof surface characteristics on bone integrationof titanium implants A histomorphomet-ric study in miniature pigs" Steinemann S 889-902,

20 "Influence of mono and bicortical anchorageon the integration of titanium implants" 25 : 229-235, 1996

21 "Human bone marrow cell cultures A sensitive method fordetermination of the biocompatibility ofimplant materials" 27 : 137-151, 1999

22 "Histomo-rphometric studies of hydroxylapatite-coated and uncoated CP titanium thread-ed implants in bone" 399-404, intjoralandmaxillofacimplants1991;6

23 "Factors related tosuccess and failure rates at 4year follow up in a multicenter study of overden tures supported by Branemark implants" 10 : 33-42, 1995

24 "Experimental study of bone response to anew surface treatment of endosseoustitanium implants" 10 : 126-131, 2001

25 "Eightyear clinical retro spective study of titanium plasma sprayedand hydroxyapatite coated cylinder implants" 11 : 340-350, 1996

26 "Design and surface characteristics of 13commercially available oral implant systems" 622-633, intjoralandmaxillofacimpl1993;8

27 "Design and surface character-istics of 13 commercially available oralimplant systems" 38-45, intjoralmaxillofacimplants1993;11

28 "Cylindrical implant-bone in-terface studied in rabbits" 272-275, actaorthopscand1988;59

29 "Bone-metalinterface in osseointegration" 597-607, jprosthetdent1987;57

30 "Bone responseto machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants An experimentalstudy in rabbits" 28 : 2-8, 2002

31 "Bone response to surface modified titanium implants" 8 : 721-729, 1997

32 "Biocompatibility of titanium implantsmodified by microarc oxidation and hydroxyapatite coating" 73 : 48-54, 2005

33 "Astudy on the stability of 5 different surfacetreatment methods to dental implant using resonance frequency and histomor phometric analysis" 43 : 78-92, 2005

34 "Assessment if theperiotest device in base line mobility measurements of craniofacial implants" 10 : 221-, 1995

35 "Ahistological assessment of the initial heal-ing response adjacent to porous surfacedTi alloy dental implants in dogs" 1064-1070, jdentres1986;65

36 "Addressing processing problems associated with plasmaspraying of hydroxyapatite coatings" 17 : 537-544, 1996

37 "A role for surface topographyin creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants" 84 : 522-534, 2000

38 "A new field of application of thePeriotest method The occlusal-periodon-tal load can now be measured quantita-tively" zahnarztlmitt1988;78

39 "A long-term follow-up studyof osseointegrated implants in the treat-ment of totally edentulous jaws" BranemarkPI 347-359, intjoralandmaxillofacimplants1990;5

40 "A histomorphometricanalysis for the effect of various surfacetreatment methods on the osseointegration" 42 : 318-329, 2004