RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고려시대 兩班田 分給의 一樣相 = Trends in the Distribution of Yangbanjŏn during the Koryŏ Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76535919

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper uses materials obtained from the Ky?ngw?n Yi clan and Tongnae Ch?ng clan to analyze the process through which the yangban class received official appointments as well as changes in the distribution of k?pch?n (給田, official salaries). Ba...

      This paper uses materials obtained from the Ky?ngw?n Yi clan and Tongnae Ch?ng clan to analyze the process through which the yangban class received official appointments as well as changes in the distribution of k?pch?n (給田, official salaries). Based on the results of this analysis, an attempt was made to analyze the structure of the yangbanj?n (兩班田, land granted to civil and military officials during their service period), which resulted in 4 different types of yangban household models being identified.
      Once an individual acquired a civil or military appointment through the civil service examinations or the granting of a special privilege, the socalled ?ms? system (蔭敍, the protected appointment system), he was perceived as forming an independent household and granted chigy?kch?n (職役田, official land or prebendal grants given to officeholders) in accordance with his official rank. Although a yangban household was composed of the yangban official and his blood ties, as the ch?nho (佃戶, peasant households) who toiled the yangbanj?n were expected to toil the yangban’s own lands as well, they came to be perceived as also being members of the yangban household. Meanwhile, officeholders who were dismissed from office and members of yangban households that failed to secure government appointments were forced to engage in other occupations in accordance with the principle that all members of society should provide their services to the state. Therefore, the yangban class during the Kory? era was not a privileged or fixed class, but one which experienced a great degree of social mobility. The inconsistency between the number of yangban households and government appointments, and the limited amount of lands that could be designated as yangbanj?n eventually resulted in a lack of such lands being available to be distributed to officials. As a result, those yangban households that were forced to adopt new occupations saw their social status change as they lost their membership in the yangban class.
      In conclusion, yangban households, which formed the backbone of the yangban bureaucracy, were considered to be a unit from which government officials could be recruited and as those who received official lands. As such, the principles of Ip 'och'ungy?k (立戶充役), in which the head of a household was expected to offer his services to the state in exchange for the state’s granting of land, was also applied to the yangban’s acquisition of government offices and the distribution of yangbanj?n.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 兩班田 分給의 대상
      • Ⅲ. 兩班田 分給의 사례
      • Ⅳ. 兩班田의 分給과 戶
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 兩班田 分給의 대상
      • Ⅲ. 兩班田 分給의 사례
      • Ⅳ. 兩班田의 分給과 戶
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • 〈ABSTRACT〉
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (재인증)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.15 1.15 1.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.21 1.16 2.615 0.53
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼