RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Cwuta as the Marker for the Benefactive Construction - A Constructionist Approach -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108850418

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The present study aims to provide empirical evidence for the constructionist view of the benefactive ditransitive construction in Korean, especially focusing on the verb of giving cwuta. Specifically, the following two constructionist arguments are tested: First, cwuta is involved in the formation of the benefactive ditransitive construction in Korean. Second, the contrast between the benefactive ditransitive construction and its interchangeable counterpart (i.e., the plain benefactive) is also observed in Korean; they are two distinct constructions. To empirically confirm these theoretical arguments, we designed an acceptability judgment test of 198 sentences and administered it to native Korean-speaking university students. The test investigated whether the presence or absence of cwuta and the type of benefactive construction (ditransitive or plain) affected the acceptability of the sentences. These results are consistent with the constructionist arguments previously mentioned. Omitting cwuta in a benefactive ditransitive construction results in lower acceptability, implying the necessity of cwuta. However, the presence or absence of cwuta was not a decisive factor in the plain benefactive construction.
      번역하기

      The present study aims to provide empirical evidence for the constructionist view of the benefactive ditransitive construction in Korean, especially focusing on the verb of giving cwuta. Specifically, the following two constructionist arguments are te...

      The present study aims to provide empirical evidence for the constructionist view of the benefactive ditransitive construction in Korean, especially focusing on the verb of giving cwuta. Specifically, the following two constructionist arguments are tested: First, cwuta is involved in the formation of the benefactive ditransitive construction in Korean. Second, the contrast between the benefactive ditransitive construction and its interchangeable counterpart (i.e., the plain benefactive) is also observed in Korean; they are two distinct constructions. To empirically confirm these theoretical arguments, we designed an acceptability judgment test of 198 sentences and administered it to native Korean-speaking university students. The test investigated whether the presence or absence of cwuta and the type of benefactive construction (ditransitive or plain) affected the acceptability of the sentences. These results are consistent with the constructionist arguments previously mentioned. Omitting cwuta in a benefactive ditransitive construction results in lower acceptability, implying the necessity of cwuta. However, the presence or absence of cwuta was not a decisive factor in the plain benefactive construction.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박소영 ; 김도훈, "한국어 ‘-주다’ 수혜 구문의 통사론" 국어학회 (84) : 117-153, 2017

      2 김경열, "보조용언 ‘주다’ 구성의 의미와 통사" 우리말글학회 78 : 27-49, 2018

      3 김지원, "‘주다’ 동사의 특징과 ‘주다’ 구문의 통사" 한국생성문법학회 31 (31): 253-272, 2021

      4 정주리, "‘-주다’ 형식의 구문과 의미" 한국어의미학회 19 : 181-207, 2006

      5 오은정, "Transitivity of Benefactive Verbs: Evidence from a Typological and Corpus-based Study" 언어연구소 (60) : 133-158, 2013

      6 Sohn, H. -M., "The Korean language" Cambridge University Press 2001

      7 Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" Cambridge University Press 213-321, 2002

      8 Van Valin, R. D., "Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function" Cambridge University Press 1997

      9 Huddleston, R., "Some theoretical issues in the description of the English verb" 40 (40): 331-383, 1976

      10 Jackendoff, R., "On Larson's treatment of the double object construction" 21 (21): 427-456, 1990

      1 박소영 ; 김도훈, "한국어 ‘-주다’ 수혜 구문의 통사론" 국어학회 (84) : 117-153, 2017

      2 김경열, "보조용언 ‘주다’ 구성의 의미와 통사" 우리말글학회 78 : 27-49, 2018

      3 김지원, "‘주다’ 동사의 특징과 ‘주다’ 구문의 통사" 한국생성문법학회 31 (31): 253-272, 2021

      4 정주리, "‘-주다’ 형식의 구문과 의미" 한국어의미학회 19 : 181-207, 2006

      5 오은정, "Transitivity of Benefactive Verbs: Evidence from a Typological and Corpus-based Study" 언어연구소 (60) : 133-158, 2013

      6 Sohn, H. -M., "The Korean language" Cambridge University Press 2001

      7 Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" Cambridge University Press 213-321, 2002

      8 Van Valin, R. D., "Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function" Cambridge University Press 1997

      9 Huddleston, R., "Some theoretical issues in the description of the English verb" 40 (40): 331-383, 1976

      10 Jackendoff, R., "On Larson's treatment of the double object construction" 21 (21): 427-456, 1990

      11 Goldberg, A., "Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions" Princeton University Press 2019

      12 Jong-BokKim, "English Auxiliary Constructions and Related Phenomena: From a Constraint-based Perspective" 언어교육원 38 (38): 1037-1076, 2002

      13 Goldberg, A., "Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure" University of Chicago Press 1995

      14 Goldberg, A., "Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language" Oxford University Press 2006

      15 Pullum, G. K., "Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries" 53 : 741-788, 1977

      16 Jespersen, O., "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI, Morphology" George Allen and Unwin Ltd 1965

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼