RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Expanding the use of a recently introduced low-cost particle monitor (DC1700 Dylos Air Quality Monitor) for sensing atmospheric PM2.5 requires comparison with data obtained using a certified method for PM2.5 based on appropriate atmospheric observations. Full-year measurements of atmospheric aerosols were taken in Nagoya, Japan during March 2017-March 2018 using the DC1700 to measure the particle number concentrations of >0.5 and >2.5 μm diameter particles and to measure the PM2.5 mass concentration (Mdry, PM2.5) using an automated β attenuation mass monitor (PM712). The number-size distribution was measured using an optical particle counter (KC01D). The dried mass concentration of 0.5-2.5 μm particles (Mdry, 0.5-2.5) was estimated from the ambient relative humidity and the DC1700 number concentration. The values of Mdry, 0.5-2.5 were invariably less than those of Mdry, PM2.5. The coefficient of determination and slope of Mdry, 0.5-2.5 to Mdry, PM2.5 for the year were, respectively, 0.68 and 0.40. Slope values changed seasonally from 0.24 in July and August 2017 to 0.55 in May and April 2017. Light absorbing particles, smaller-fine particles, and the estimation method of Mdry, 0.5-2.5 were inferred as causes of the difference between Mdry, 0.5-2.5 and Mdry, PM2.5. Especially, we estimated a large contribution (ca. 54% underestimation of Mdry, 0.5-2.5 into Mdry, PM2.5) of particles smaller than the minimum detection diameter of DC1700. The seasonal variation of Mdry, 0.5-2.5/Mdry, PM2.5 was related to the volume fraction of particles smaller than 0.5 μm. Good correlation of Mdry, 0.5-2.5 to Mdry, PM2.5 suggests that data obtained using DC1700 with a correction factor are useful as a rough proxy of atmospheric PM2.5 within a season. However, precise estimation of PM2.5 from the DC1700 number concentrations should include appropriate corrections of the size distribution, not only hygroscopicity.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Hasegawa, S., "Verification of measured values by PM2. 5 automatic measuring instruments using the standard method" 43 (43): 40-46, 2018

2 Snider, G., "Variation in global chemical composition of PM2.5: emerging results from SPARTAN" 16 : 9629-9653, 2016

3 Semple, S., "Using a new, low-cost air quality sensor to quantify second-hand smoke(SHS)levels in homes" 24 (24): 2013

4 Zhang, Q., "Transboundary Health Impacts of Transported Global Air Pollution and International Trade" 543 : 705-709, 2017

5 Kumar, P., "The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities" 75 : 199-205, 2015

6 Jayaratne, R., "The influence of humidity on the performance of a low-cost air particle mass sensor and the effect of atmospheric fog" 11 (11): 4883-4890, 2018

7 Lelieveld, J., "The Contribution of Outdoor Air Pollution Sources to Premature Mortality on a Global Scale" 525 : 367-371, 2015

8 Liu, D., "Performance calibration of low-cost and portable particular matter(PM)sensors" 112 : 1-10, 2017

9 Slowik, J. G., "Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 2: Application to Combustion-Generated Soot Aerosols as a Function of Fuel Equivalence Ratio" 38 (38): 1206-1222, 2004

10 Jovašević-Stojanović, M., "On the use of small and cheaper sensors and devices for indicative citizen-based monitoring of respirable particulate matter" 206 : 696-704, 2015