RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      “一带一路”倡议下的中国—东盟合作与挑战 ― 以基础设施与产业园区建设为例 = China-ASEAN Cooperation and Challenges under the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: Cases of Infrastructure Constructions and Industrial Zones

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106515068

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Southeast Asia has become a key area for the development of the “Belt and Road’ initiative (BRI). At present, among the six economic corridors planned by the BRI, Southeast Asia has covered two of them – the China-Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor and the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor. In the meantime, Southeast Asia is also an important part of ”21st Century Maritime Silk Road“ initiative, and thus can been considered as a sample of demonstration for the globalization strategy of the BRI. This study finds that in recent years, China-invested infrastructure and connnectivity building (particularly the railway constructions) have been growing fast in Southeast Asia. In addition, a number of China-ASEAN industrial cooperation zones have been established. Together with an increasing number of enterprises settled in these zones, transnational supply chains have begun to take shape. In this context, China’s private-owned enterprises have also started to expand their investment in the Southeast Asian markets. Nonetheless, the BRI has been confronted with problems and challenges, and has been criticized for the lack of risk management, profitability, sustainability, localization and public support. It shows that the export of ”China Model“ can be problematic, as it remains not adapted to other countries’ local conditions. This research first looks at the achievements of the BRI in Southeast Asia, and then examines the problems and challenges in these projects. Finally, this article also aims to provide a number of policy recommendations to the Chinese government.
      번역하기

      Southeast Asia has become a key area for the development of the “Belt and Road’ initiative (BRI). At present, among the six economic corridors planned by the BRI, Southeast Asia has covered two of them – the China-Indochina Peninsula Economic Co...

      Southeast Asia has become a key area for the development of the “Belt and Road’ initiative (BRI). At present, among the six economic corridors planned by the BRI, Southeast Asia has covered two of them – the China-Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor and the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor. In the meantime, Southeast Asia is also an important part of ”21st Century Maritime Silk Road“ initiative, and thus can been considered as a sample of demonstration for the globalization strategy of the BRI. This study finds that in recent years, China-invested infrastructure and connnectivity building (particularly the railway constructions) have been growing fast in Southeast Asia. In addition, a number of China-ASEAN industrial cooperation zones have been established. Together with an increasing number of enterprises settled in these zones, transnational supply chains have begun to take shape. In this context, China’s private-owned enterprises have also started to expand their investment in the Southeast Asian markets. Nonetheless, the BRI has been confronted with problems and challenges, and has been criticized for the lack of risk management, profitability, sustainability, localization and public support. It shows that the export of ”China Model“ can be problematic, as it remains not adapted to other countries’ local conditions. This research first looks at the achievements of the BRI in Southeast Asia, and then examines the problems and challenges in these projects. Finally, this article also aims to provide a number of policy recommendations to the Chinese government.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      东南亚地区是“一带一路”倡议中的重点区域。在目前“一带一路”规划的六大经济走廊中,东南亚地区集聚了“孟中印缅经济走廊”和“中南半岛经济走廊”,同时也是“海上丝绸之路”构想的重要一环,因此可以被视为“一带一路”全球化过程中的重要示范样本。本研究发现,近年来,中国投资的基础设施建设(特别以铁路建设为核心)在东盟各国迅速铺开。同时,以产业园区为例,一批中国—东盟产业园区开始进驻企业,跨国产业链雏形正在形成,民营企业也开始逐步加大在东南亚国家的投资力度。尽管如此,“一带一路”倡议在东南亚仍然问题重重,在风险控制、盈利能力、可持续性发展、本土化战略、民意相通等问题上遭到了广泛的质疑和批评,反映出“中国模式”的海外输出存在诸多水土不服。本文将重点考察“一带一路”倡议在东南亚地区取得的成绩,以及可能面临的困难及挑战。同时,本研究将试图为中国政府提出可行的政策建议。
      번역하기

      东南亚地区是“一带一路”倡议中的重点区域。在目前“一带一路”规划的六大经济走廊中,东南亚地区集聚了“孟中印缅经济走廊”和“中南半岛经济走廊”,同时也是“海上丝绸之路”...

      东南亚地区是“一带一路”倡议中的重点区域。在目前“一带一路”规划的六大经济走廊中,东南亚地区集聚了“孟中印缅经济走廊”和“中南半岛经济走廊”,同时也是“海上丝绸之路”构想的重要一环,因此可以被视为“一带一路”全球化过程中的重要示范样本。本研究发现,近年来,中国投资的基础设施建设(特别以铁路建设为核心)在东盟各国迅速铺开。同时,以产业园区为例,一批中国—东盟产业园区开始进驻企业,跨国产业链雏形正在形成,民营企业也开始逐步加大在东南亚国家的投资力度。尽管如此,“一带一路”倡议在东南亚仍然问题重重,在风险控制、盈利能力、可持续性发展、本土化战略、民意相通等问题上遭到了广泛的质疑和批评,反映出“中国模式”的海外输出存在诸多水土不服。本文将重点考察“一带一路”倡议在东南亚地区取得的成绩,以及可能面临的困难及挑战。同时,本研究将试图为中国政府提出可行的政策建议。

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 中国商务部, "对外投资发展报告2018"

      2 复旦大学一带一路及全球治理研究院, "孟中印缅经济走廊的安全困境"

      3 缅甸金凤凰报, "中缅铁路缅甸段正式启动勘测"

      4 中国商务部国际贸易经济合作研究院, "中国民营企业“一带一路”可持续发展报告"

      5 全球化智库, "中国企业全球化报告" 社会科学文献出版社 2018

      6 郭延军, "中国东盟“一带一路”合作:主要进展、多元认知及推进路径" (5) : 2019

      7 马来西亚光华网, "东南亚6国外债飙升 中国制造债务危机?"

      8 ZHANG MUHUI, "东北亚能否成为“一带一路”的新潜力区域?− 中国的视角及前景分析" 중국연구소 22 (22): 73-91, 2019

      9 东南亚知识产权信息服务平台, "一带一路倡议在东南亚的进展、成果和前景"

      10 安永中国, "“中国走出去”系列第七期—“一带一路”拓展宏图海外投资稳步前行" 2018

      1 中国商务部, "对外投资发展报告2018"

      2 复旦大学一带一路及全球治理研究院, "孟中印缅经济走廊的安全困境"

      3 缅甸金凤凰报, "中缅铁路缅甸段正式启动勘测"

      4 中国商务部国际贸易经济合作研究院, "中国民营企业“一带一路”可持续发展报告"

      5 全球化智库, "中国企业全球化报告" 社会科学文献出版社 2018

      6 郭延军, "中国东盟“一带一路”合作:主要进展、多元认知及推进路径" (5) : 2019

      7 马来西亚光华网, "东南亚6国外债飙升 中国制造债务危机?"

      8 ZHANG MUHUI, "东北亚能否成为“一带一路”的新潜力区域?− 中国的视角及前景分析" 중국연구소 22 (22): 73-91, 2019

      9 东南亚知识产权信息服务平台, "一带一路倡议在东南亚的进展、成果和前景"

      10 安永中国, "“中国走出去”系列第七期—“一带一路”拓展宏图海外投资稳步前行" 2018

      11 程晓勇, "“一带一路”背景下中国与东南亚国家海洋非传统安全合作" (1) : 2018

      12 中国投资指南网, "“一带一路”沿线园区名录"

      13 王子昌, "“一带一路”战略与华侨华人的逻辑连接" (3) : 2015

      14 复旦大学, "“一带一路”南亚、东南亚地区民意及其影响实证分析"

      15 人民大学重阳金融研究院, "“一带一路”五周年:政策视角下的回顾与展望"

      16 任远喆, "“一带一路”与中国在东南亚的“高铁外交”实践" (3) : 2019

      17 复旦大学一带一路及全球治理研究院, "“一带一路”2018年度报告"

      18 The Jakarta Post, "Work on Sections of LRT, High-speed Railway Suspended to Ease Traffic"

      19 Custer, Samantha, "Ties that Bind: Quantifying China’s Public Diplomacy and its ’Good Neighbor’ Effect" Aiddata at William & Mary 2018

      20 Kana, Ganeshwaran, "The Real Economics of ECRL"

      21 Liu, Hong, "The Political Economy of a Rising China in Southeast Asia:Malaysia’s Response to the Belt and Road Initiative" 28 (28): 2019

      22 Acharya, Amitav, "The Myth of ASEAN Centrality?" 39 (39): 2017

      23 Gong, Xue, "The Belt & Road Initiative and China’s Influence in Southeast Asia" 32 (32): 2019

      24 Pavlićević, Dragan, "Testing the China Threat Paradigm: China's High-speed Railway Diplomacy in Southeast Asia" 31 (31): 2018

      25 Chen, Shaofeng, "Regional Responses to China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative in Southeast Asia" 27 (27): 2018

      26 Rillo, Aladdin D, "Public Financing of Infrastructure in Asia: In Search of New Solutions" ADBI 2017

      27 Blanchard, Jean-Marc, F, "Probing China’s 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative: An Examination of MSRI Narratives’" 22 (22): 2017

      28 Pew Research Center, "People around the Globe are Divided in their Opinions of China"

      29 Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka, "New Dynamics in Sino-Japanese Rivalry: Sustaining Infrastructure Development in Asia" 27 (27): 2018

      30 Malik, J. Mohan, "Myanmar’s Role in China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative" 27 (27): 2018

      31 Jiang, Yang, "Competitive Partners in Development Financing: China and Japan Expanding Overseas Infrastructure Investment" 32 (32): 2019

      32 Baviera, Aileen, "China’s Strategic Foreign Initiatives under Xi Jinping: An ASEAN Perspective" 2 (2): 2016

      33 Blanchard, Jean-Marc, F, "China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative (MSRI) and Southeast Asia: A Chinese ‘pond’ not ‘lake’ in the Works" 27 (27): 2018

      34 Zhao, Hong, "China–Japan Compete for Infrastructure Investment in Southeast Asia: Geopolitical Rivalry or Healthy Competition?" 28 (28): 2019

      35 Prashanth, Parameswaran, "Beijing Unveils New strategy for ASEAN-China Relations" 13 (13): 2014

      36 Pew Research Center, "Attitudes toward China"

      37 商务部走出去公共服务平台, "2018年1-12月我对“一带一路”沿线国家投资合作情况"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.28 0.28 0.3
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.29 0.27 0.439 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼