RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국어판 수정된 통증 신경생리학 지식 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 = Construct Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108909180

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the RevisedNeurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (RNPQ-K)Methods: The English version of RNPQ was translated into Korean using standard translation guidelines....

      Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the RevisedNeurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (RNPQ-K)Methods: The English version of RNPQ was translated into Korean using standard translation guidelines. Surveydata were collected from 314 physical therapists working in Korea through a social networking service. Itemanalysis, internal consistency, reliability, content validity, and construct validity of the RNPQ-K were evaluated.
      Results: The RNPQ-K was composed of 12 items. No floor and ceiling effects were observed in physicaltherapists. The internal consistency had a Cronbach’s α-coefficient of 0.64. The content validity score wasmore than 0.93 and the exploratory factor analysis for the construct validity testing generated three factors.
      Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the RNPQ-K can be applied to Korean users to assessand quantify pain knowledge. It is hoped that this tool can be used in physiotherapy research related to paininterventions or as a measure to verify the effectiveness of pain reconceptualization in patients.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼