RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Dispute over Diaoyudao (Senkakuretto) and Its Implications for Dokdo ― Conflicts over History, Relevant Names and Boundaries ―

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106464872

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study surveys the issue of Diaoyudao out of Japan's several territorial disputes, laying stress on geographical names, history, state position, boundaries, and its implications for Dokdo. Today, both China and Japan continue to have a variety of opposing opinions in connection with the territoriality over Diaoyudao. From the perspective of a third party, it may not be easy to regard the opinion of a state party as appropriate. However, provided that one considers the historical aspects only, it seems hard to deny that the Chinese opinion is more persuasive. Since 1971, the territorial dispute over Diaoyudao between China and Japan has been one of the most difficult disputes in the world, as the islands are located in the area rich in hydrocarbon resources as well as strategically important for both countries. China and Japan stick to their respective opinions that the territoriality of its own country over the islands is unquestionable under international law or from historical point of view. As there is a great difference of opinions between the two states, the propriety of territorial dispute around these islands does not look to be resolved in the near future. Anyway, we cannot help paying sharp attention to the progress of this dispute. It is because there is considerable similarity between the territorial dispute over Diaoyudao between China and Japan, and the Dokdo issue between Korea and Japan in many respects. So, after examining relevant historical and legal issues relating to this dispute, we should prepare for the incessant Japan's territorial claim over Dokdo. Japan holds a view that keeping occupation over its own territory is the best policy, whereas it insists that it should keep raising objections to other countries' occupation of the disputed territories. Thereupon, we should have a deep understanding of Japan's self-contradictory attitude towards relevant territorial disputes, and then we should work out a rational countermeasure with regard to Dokdo based on cool judgment.
      번역하기

      This study surveys the issue of Diaoyudao out of Japan's several territorial disputes, laying stress on geographical names, history, state position, boundaries, and its implications for Dokdo. Today, both China and Japan continue to have a variety of ...

      This study surveys the issue of Diaoyudao out of Japan's several territorial disputes, laying stress on geographical names, history, state position, boundaries, and its implications for Dokdo. Today, both China and Japan continue to have a variety of opposing opinions in connection with the territoriality over Diaoyudao. From the perspective of a third party, it may not be easy to regard the opinion of a state party as appropriate. However, provided that one considers the historical aspects only, it seems hard to deny that the Chinese opinion is more persuasive. Since 1971, the territorial dispute over Diaoyudao between China and Japan has been one of the most difficult disputes in the world, as the islands are located in the area rich in hydrocarbon resources as well as strategically important for both countries. China and Japan stick to their respective opinions that the territoriality of its own country over the islands is unquestionable under international law or from historical point of view. As there is a great difference of opinions between the two states, the propriety of territorial dispute around these islands does not look to be resolved in the near future. Anyway, we cannot help paying sharp attention to the progress of this dispute. It is because there is considerable similarity between the territorial dispute over Diaoyudao between China and Japan, and the Dokdo issue between Korea and Japan in many respects. So, after examining relevant historical and legal issues relating to this dispute, we should prepare for the incessant Japan's territorial claim over Dokdo. Japan holds a view that keeping occupation over its own territory is the best policy, whereas it insists that it should keep raising objections to other countries' occupation of the disputed territories. Thereupon, we should have a deep understanding of Japan's self-contradictory attitude towards relevant territorial disputes, and then we should work out a rational countermeasure with regard to Dokdo based on cool judgment.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Hatano Ribo, "Work Book International Law" Yuhikaku 1985

      2 Okuhara Toshio, "The Territorial Sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands and Problems on the Surrounding Continental Shelf" (15) : 1971

      3 Steven Wei Su, "The Territorial Dispute over the Tiaoyu/Senakaku Islands" 36 : 2005

      4 Tao Cheng, "The Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Tiayutai (Senkaku) Isaland and the Law of Territorial Acquisition" 14 : 1974

      5 Brownlie, Ian, "The Rule of Law in International Affairs-International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations-"

      6 Kentaro Serita, "Territories of Japan" Chuokoronsha 2002

      7 Akashi Yasushi, "Territorial Issues of Japan" Jiyukokuminsha 2002

      8 Ueji Tatsunori, "Senkakushoto and Takeshima" Kyoikusha 1978

      9 Kazutaka Kishaba, "Senkakushoto and Records on Tribute Envoys" 63 : 1972

      10 Inoue Kiyoshi, "Senkakuretto" Daisanshokan 1996

      1 Hatano Ribo, "Work Book International Law" Yuhikaku 1985

      2 Okuhara Toshio, "The Territorial Sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands and Problems on the Surrounding Continental Shelf" (15) : 1971

      3 Steven Wei Su, "The Territorial Dispute over the Tiaoyu/Senakaku Islands" 36 : 2005

      4 Tao Cheng, "The Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Tiayutai (Senkaku) Isaland and the Law of Territorial Acquisition" 14 : 1974

      5 Brownlie, Ian, "The Rule of Law in International Affairs-International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations-"

      6 Kentaro Serita, "Territories of Japan" Chuokoronsha 2002

      7 Akashi Yasushi, "Territorial Issues of Japan" Jiyukokuminsha 2002

      8 Ueji Tatsunori, "Senkakushoto and Takeshima" Kyoikusha 1978

      9 Kazutaka Kishaba, "Senkakushoto and Records on Tribute Envoys" 63 : 1972

      10 Inoue Kiyoshi, "Senkakuretto" Daisanshokan 1996

      11 Jerome Alan Cohen, "People's China and International Law, A Documentary Study, Vol.1" Princeton University 1974

      12 Robert Jennings, "Oppenheim's International Law"

      13 Jon M. Van Dyke, "Legal Issues related to Sovereignty over Dokdo and Its Maritime Boundary" 38 : 2007

      14 Chiyuki Mizukami, "Law of the Sea" Yushinto 2005

      15 Choung-Il Chee, "Korean Perspectives on Ocean Law Issues for the 21st Century" Kluwer Law International 1999

      16 Hosaka Yuji, "Korea Dokdo" Sungandang Company 2010

      17 Charn-kiu KIM, "Islands Disputes in the East Asia and Dokdo" 1998

      18 Ando Nisuke, "International law" Yuhikaku 1993

      19 Kanae Taijudo, "International Law on the Attribution of Territory" Toshinto 1998

      20 International Law Case Studies Group, "International Law Case Studies on Japan(3) – Territory -" Keiotsushin 1990

      21 Ronald H. Severaid, "International Court of Justice Opinion Briefs" 1978

      22 Yoshiro Matsui, "Internatinal Law of Territorial Acquisition and the Dispute over the Senkaku(Diayu) Islands" (40) : 1997

      23 Murata Tadayishi, "How Should We See Senkakushoto/Diaoyudao Issue" Nihonkyohousha 2004

      24 Martin Dixon, "Cases and Materials on International Law" Blackstone Press Limited 2000

      25 Yamada Yoshiko, "Boundaries of Japan" Shinchosha 2005

      26 Kanae Taijudo, "Attribution Issue over Takeshima and Senkakusyoto" Yushinto 1983

      27 Hungdah Chiu, "An Analysis of the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the T'iaoyutai Islets(Senkaku Gunto)" 15 : 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-10-08 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
      영문명 : 미등록 -> Law Research Institute in University of Seoul
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.98 0.98 0.96
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.87 1.118 0.44
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼