RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      밝기 척도를 위한 정신물리학 실험 방법 비교: 크기 추정법과 크기 생성법 = Comparison of Psychophysical Methods for Brightness Scale: Magnitude Estimation and Magnitude Production

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108042208

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The psychophysical experimental methods affect the observer’s evaluation because of the bias error. Therefore, it is necessary to design experiments properly. In this study, the experimental methods were compared for the brightness scale experiment,...

      The psychophysical experimental methods affect the observer’s evaluation because of the bias error. Therefore, it is necessary to design experiments properly. In this study, the experimental methods were compared for the brightness scale experiment, and the effect of stimuli setting was investigated. Magnitude estimation and magnitude production were used for comparison. There were three brightness scale experiments which have different stimuli settings. Each experiment had two phases. The magnitude estimation and magnitude production were conducted in each phase. The neutral patches were used for stimuli. In magnitude estimation, observers evaluated the brightness of test stimuli by number compared with reference. Magnitude production is the inverse of magnitude estimation. Observer was provided with a number representing the magnitude of a stimulus and adjusted the luminance of the stimulus to produce corresponding brightness with given number. As an overall result, there are large differences between magnitude estimation and magnitude production. As the luminance of test stimulus increases or decreases compared to reference stimulus, the difference between results of two methods is increased. The range of test stimuli and the number of stimuli also affect the result. As the range of test stimuli became wider and the number of test stimuli increased, the effect of the experimental method decreases in a mid-range. Therefore, to reduce the bias according to the psychophysical experimental method, it is necessary to set a wide stimulus range and the number of stimuli properly when conducting a brightness scale experiment.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Wright, W. D, "Why and How Chromatic Adaptation Has Been Studied" 6 (6): 147-152, 1981

      2 Moroney, N, "The CIECAM02color appearance model" 23-27, 2002

      3 Luo, M. R, "Quantifying colour appearance. Part I. LUTCHI colour appearance data" 16 (16): 166-180, 1991

      4 Prins, N, "Psychophysics: a practical introduction" Academic Press 2016

      5 Stevens, S. S, "On the brightness of lights and the loudness of sounds" 118 : 576-, 1953

      6 Stevens, S. S, "Measurement and man" 127 (127): 383-389, 1958

      7 Stevens, S. S, "Issues in psychophysical measurement" 78 (78): 426-, 1971

      8 Withouck, M, "Experimental driven modelling of the color appearance of unrelated self-luminous stimuli : CAM15u" 23 (23): 12045-12064, 2015

      9 Bartleson, C, "Comparison of chromaticadaptation transforms" 3 (3): 129-136, 1978

      10 Fairchild, M. D, "Color appearance models" John Wiley & Sons 2013

      1 Wright, W. D, "Why and How Chromatic Adaptation Has Been Studied" 6 (6): 147-152, 1981

      2 Moroney, N, "The CIECAM02color appearance model" 23-27, 2002

      3 Luo, M. R, "Quantifying colour appearance. Part I. LUTCHI colour appearance data" 16 (16): 166-180, 1991

      4 Prins, N, "Psychophysics: a practical introduction" Academic Press 2016

      5 Stevens, S. S, "On the brightness of lights and the loudness of sounds" 118 : 576-, 1953

      6 Stevens, S. S, "Measurement and man" 127 (127): 383-389, 1958

      7 Stevens, S. S, "Issues in psychophysical measurement" 78 (78): 426-, 1971

      8 Withouck, M, "Experimental driven modelling of the color appearance of unrelated self-luminous stimuli : CAM15u" 23 (23): 12045-12064, 2015

      9 Bartleson, C, "Comparison of chromaticadaptation transforms" 3 (3): 129-136, 1978

      10 Fairchild, M. D, "Color appearance models" John Wiley & Sons 2013

      11 Hermans, S, "Color appearance model for self-luminous stimuli" 35 (35): 2000-2009, 2018

      12 Bartleson, C, "Changes in color appearance with variations in chromatic adaptation" 4 (4): 119-138, 1979

      13 Onley, J. W, "Brightness scaling of white and colored stimuli" 132 (132): 1668-1670, 1960

      14 Bartleson, C. J, "Brightness perception in complex fields" 57 (57): 953-957, 1967

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-12-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Society of Color Studies -> Journal of Korea Society of Color Studies KCI등재
      2014-10-28 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Society Of Color Studies -> Korea Society of Color Studies KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-06-05 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Society of Color Studies KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국색채학회논문집
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.57 0.57 0.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.53 0.5 0.905 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼