교사의 문법과 학습자의 문법 = The Teacher`s Grammar and the Learner`s Grammar

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper aims to improve the effectiveness of the grammar education of the Korean language. There are several basic questions in relation to the solution of the gap between the teacher`s grammar and the learner`s grammar. I will start with verifying the Korean grammar which teachers have in their mind and concretize the shape of the grammar required to the learners. The teaching of the grammar has been implemented without having an interest in the teacher`s grammar since teachers whose native language is Korean or who have learned the school grammar would have the grammar in which there are the contents of the grammar teaching. There should be two considerations for verifying the teacher`s grammar. One is verifying whether the teacher`s grammar is the one teachers know or the one teachers think that they know and verifying the grammar teaching based on the grammar which teachers think that they know. This means that there is a significant gap between the general school grammar and the grammar which should be taught to the learners of Korean. The other is verifying the learner`s grammar. We can use two different levels for verifying this. The first one is the comparison of the grammatical categories of the Korean grammar and of the grammar of the language that the learners know. The second one is the comparison of the contents of the grammatical categories when they have the identical categories. For solving the questions presented above, this paper deals with honorific expressions and the tense. In relation to the grammar which teachers want to teach, I point out that there is a limit of the grammatical knowledge of the teachers and they should get out of it by giving the examples of honorific expressions. For learners, they should know that they have to have the attitude of learning an entirely novel grammar since there are very rare opportunities of accordance of grammatical categories between their L1 grammar and the Korean grammar. This means that there might be some differences of delicate contents of some identical categories between their L1 grammar and that of Korean. Some examples of the tense are used for identifying this.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임홍빈, "현대의 {-삽-}과 예사 높임의 ‘-오’에 대하여, In 선오당김형기선생팔질기념 국어학논총" 창학사 403-457, 1985

2 한재영, "한국어 문법 교육" 태학사 2008

3 한재영, "한국어 교육 총서 3 ‘한국어 문법 교육’ 개발, 한국어 세계화 2003년도 사업 최종보고서" 문화관광부 ‧ 한국어세계화재단 2003

4 한재영, "한국어 교수법" 태학사 2004

5 이재기, "초·중학교 국어과 교육과정 해설 연구 개발" 한국교육과정평가원 2007

6 임홍빈, "청자 존대법상의 ‘해’체와 ‘해라’체에 대하여, In 천시권 박사 화갑기념 국어학 논총" 형설출판사 281-316, 1985

7 임홍빈, "청자 대우 등급의 명명법에 대하여, In 약천 회갑 국어학 신연구" 탑출판사 534-546, 1985

8 한재영, "중세국어의 대우 체계 소고-‘’을 중심으로-" 8 : 1-22, 1992

9 박양규, "존칭 체언의 통사론적 특징" 진단학회 40 : 81-108, 1975

10 임홍빈, "존경법, In 국어연구 어디까지 왔나" 동아출판사 388-400, 1990

11 임홍빈, "어휘적 대우와 대우법 체계의 문제, In 강신항교수회갑기념 국어학논문집" 705-741, 1990

12 한재영, "대우와 격식, In 세기 국어학의 과제(솔미 정광교수 화갑기념논문집)" 도서출판 월인 491-508, 2000

13 한재영, "님금과 임금님, 국어 어휘의 기반과 역사, In 심재기 선생 회갑기념논총" 태학사 719-735, 1998

14 이재기, "국어과 교육과정 개정 시안 수정·보완 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2007

15 이익섭, "국어 경어법의 체계화 문제" 2 : 39-64, 1974

16 한재영, "尊稱體言 小考, In 이병근선생퇴임기념 국어학논총" 태학사 491-509, 2006

17 한재영, "中世國語 時制體系에 對한 管見 : 先語末語尾 {더}의 位置定立을 중심으로" 11 (11): 258-284, 1986

18 임홍빈, "{-시-}와 경험주 상정의 시점" 14 : 287-336, 1985

19 한재영, "[단행본] 한국어 교수법" 태학사 709-725, 2005

20 한재영, "16세기 국어의 시제체계와 변화 양상 연구" 진단학회 (93) : 199-220, 2002

21 한재영, "16세기 국어의 대우 체계 연구" 31 : 121-164, 1998