RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국과 미국의 부모가 기대하는 영유아교사의 전문성에 대한 비교 연구 = A comparative study on the expertise of infant and toddler teachers expected by parents in Korea and the United States

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109367947

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives This study compares two different parent groups' perspectives on ECEC (Early Childhood Education and Care) educator professionalism. As a result, this study provides insights into the policy making process, teacher preparation curriculum, and certification process in the ECEC field.
      Methods A semi-structed one-to-one interview was conducted with Korean parents and Korean/Korean-American parents. All collected data were carefully categorized and coded. For trustworthiness, triangulation and member checks were chosen.
      Results Parents in South Korea expect professionalism from ECEC educators: Teachers who co-parent on behalf of parents, Teachers who serve children with sincerity, and Teachers who have licenses for kindergartens and childcare centers. Parents in the U.S.A expect professionalism from ECEC educators: Teachers who co-parent alongside parents, teachers who have a warm heart, and teachers who have majored in ECEC relevant fields or been certified for teaching specialized program. As a final point, both parent groups view veteran teachers as pro fessionals due to their presence of mind and long experiences.
      Conclusions The study reveals that two groups of parents in different countries view ECEC educators' pro fessionalism differently. The professionalism of ECEC educators needs to be investigated from different angles and with the voices of stakeholders included. Furthermore, to improve the professionalism of ECEC educators, not only reforming the teacher preparation curriculum and the certification process but also ongoing policy support is necessary.
      번역하기

      Objectives This study compares two different parent groups' perspectives on ECEC (Early Childhood Education and Care) educator professionalism. As a result, this study provides insights into the policy making process, teacher preparation curriculum, a...

      Objectives This study compares two different parent groups' perspectives on ECEC (Early Childhood Education and Care) educator professionalism. As a result, this study provides insights into the policy making process, teacher preparation curriculum, and certification process in the ECEC field.
      Methods A semi-structed one-to-one interview was conducted with Korean parents and Korean/Korean-American parents. All collected data were carefully categorized and coded. For trustworthiness, triangulation and member checks were chosen.
      Results Parents in South Korea expect professionalism from ECEC educators: Teachers who co-parent on behalf of parents, Teachers who serve children with sincerity, and Teachers who have licenses for kindergartens and childcare centers. Parents in the U.S.A expect professionalism from ECEC educators: Teachers who co-parent alongside parents, teachers who have a warm heart, and teachers who have majored in ECEC relevant fields or been certified for teaching specialized program. As a final point, both parent groups view veteran teachers as pro fessionals due to their presence of mind and long experiences.
      Conclusions The study reveals that two groups of parents in different countries view ECEC educators' pro fessionalism differently. The professionalism of ECEC educators needs to be investigated from different angles and with the voices of stakeholders included. Furthermore, to improve the professionalism of ECEC educators, not only reforming the teacher preparation curriculum and the certification process but also ongoing policy support is necessary.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼