RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Degree Equative Constructions in English

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108114105

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      When comparing certain properties between two entities, the evaluation is generally comparatively high or comparatively low. However, a certain type of comparative sentence (hereinafter, a degree equative construction) does not contain the entity to b...

      When comparing certain properties between two entities, the evaluation is generally comparatively high or comparatively low. However, a certain type of comparative sentence (hereinafter, a degree equative construction) does not contain the entity to be compared. This study addresses such English degree equative constructions, seeking to identify their grammatical characteristics and describe the circumstances in which they are used by carefully examining their syntactic and semantic properties based on corpora data. To this end, to different analysis types are adopted: raw frequency and collostructional. The study investigates the distributional properties of the parameters to identify which properties degree equative constructions are used to compare. The total number of parameters is only 33, an unexpectedly small number. In addition, the study identifies four different types of degree equative constructions in terms of the relationship between the target of comparison and three other elements: premodificational, postmodificational, predicative, and adverbial. To understand degree equative constructions through collostructional analysis, the study calculates the association strength between the parameters and degree equative constructions. Thirteen parameters are the most strongly associated with the construction, and their value is infinite. Thus, this parameter group can be viewed as providing prototypical meanings.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Kennedy, C., "Vagueness and grammar : The semantics of relative and absolute gradable predicates" 30 : 1-45, 2007

      2 Merchant, J., "Two phrasal comparatives in Greek" University of Chicago 2012

      3 Andersen, R., "Transfer to somewhere" 1 : 177-201, 1983

      4 Davies, M., "Time magazine corpus: 100 million words, 1923-2006"

      5 Rett, J., "The polysemy of measurement" 143 : 242-266, 2014

      6 Klein, E., "The interpretation of adjectival comparatives" 18 : 113-136, 1982

      7 Davies, M., "The corpus of contemporary American English: 1.0 billion words, 1990-2019"

      8 Stassen, L, "The comparative compared" 3.1 (3.1): 143-182, 1984

      9 Hilpert, M., "The English comparative–language structure and language use" 12 (12): 395-417, 2008

      10 Huddleston, R. D., "The Cambridge grammar of the English Language" Cambridge University Press 1099-1170, 2002

      1 Kennedy, C., "Vagueness and grammar : The semantics of relative and absolute gradable predicates" 30 : 1-45, 2007

      2 Merchant, J., "Two phrasal comparatives in Greek" University of Chicago 2012

      3 Andersen, R., "Transfer to somewhere" 1 : 177-201, 1983

      4 Davies, M., "Time magazine corpus: 100 million words, 1923-2006"

      5 Rett, J., "The polysemy of measurement" 143 : 242-266, 2014

      6 Klein, E., "The interpretation of adjectival comparatives" 18 : 113-136, 1982

      7 Davies, M., "The corpus of contemporary American English: 1.0 billion words, 1990-2019"

      8 Stassen, L, "The comparative compared" 3.1 (3.1): 143-182, 1984

      9 Hilpert, M., "The English comparative–language structure and language use" 12 (12): 395-417, 2008

      10 Huddleston, R. D., "The Cambridge grammar of the English Language" Cambridge University Press 1099-1170, 2002

      11 Bresnan, J. W., "Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English" 4 : 275-343, 1973

      12 Grimshaw, J., "Subdeletion" 18 (18): 659-669, 1987

      13 Treis, Y., "Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective (Vol. 117)" John Benjamins Publishing Company 2017

      14 Rett, J., "Separate but equal: A typology of equative constructions" UCLA 2019

      15 Kennedy, C., "Scale structure, degree modification and the semantic typology of gradable predicates" 81 (81): 345-381, 2005

      16 Strauss, U., "Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax" GLSA Publications 183-198, 2004

      17 Kennedy, C., "Polar opposition and the ontology of degrees" 24 : 33-70, 2001

      18 Wunderlich, D., "Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics and discourse" Benjamins 75-89, 2001

      19 Bresnan, J. W., "On the form and functioning of transformations" 7 (7): 3-40, 1976

      20 Kennedy, C., "Modes of comparison" 2007

      21 Stassen, L., "Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (Vol. 2)" 993-997, 2001

      22 Lyons, J., "Introduction to theoretical linguistics(Vol. 510)" Cambridge University Press 1968

      23 Corver, N., "Freezing effects" 2 : 383-406, 2006

      24 Haspelmath, M., "Equative constructions in world-wide perspective" 9-32, 2017

      25 Haspelmath, M., "Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe" de Gruyter 277-334, 1998

      26 Kennedy, C., "Encyclopedia of language and linguistics" Elsevier Limited 690-694, 2005

      27 Henkelmann, P., "Constructions of equative comparison" 59 (59): 370-398, 2006

      28 Hilpert, M., "Construction grammar and its application to English" Edinburgh University Press 2014

      29 Stassen, L., "Comparison and universal grammar" Blackwell 1985

      30 Napoli, D. J., "Comparative ellipsis : A phrase structure analysis" 14 (14): 675-694, 1983

      31 Pilch, H., "Comparative constructions in English" 41 (41): 37-58, 1965

      32 Dixon, R. W., "Comparative constructions : A cross-linguistic typology" 32 (32): 787-817, 2008

      33 Haspelmath, M., "Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies" 86 (86): 663-687, 2010

      34 Stefanowitsch, A., "Collostructions : Investigating the interaction of words and constructions" 8 (8): 209-243, 2003

      35 Quirk, R., "A university grammar of English" Longman 1973

      36 Klein, E., "A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives" 4 : 1-45, 1980

      37 Quirk R., "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" Pearson Longman 1985

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-01-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> LANGUAGE RESEARCH KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-04-23 학회명변경 한글명 : 어학연구소 -> 언어교육원 KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.58 0.58 0.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.56 0.52 1.474 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼