RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      비트겐슈타인 철학의 방법론적 구조 = The Structure of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Methods

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101016526

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Wittgenstein thinks that the problems of philosophy come from the misunderstanding of the logic and grammar of our language. It is something that can be resolved with the correct logical point of view or perspicuous perspective. His philosophical work aims to reveal the illicitness of the philosophical problems and to dissolve those problems by the philosophical elucidation. He carries through the way of critique of language.
      It is widely acknowledged that Wittgenstein’s work is punctuated by a radical shift dividing it into an early and late period. Nevertheless, while from a doctrinal point of view this would seem to be undeniable, the possibility remains that Wittgenstein’s work reveals the continuity of the development of a certain problematic. Now, This is suggested by the same method in early and late period. For the more, his method duplicate the process to elucidate the problems and purpose to discover. This is a philosophizing on the way(μετ? οδ??) to the purpose.
      This structure of philosophical method is developed by oppositional relations. This composed of two axis what can be said and what cannot be said. The world be logical and ethical form. Logic make what can be said been as a foundation of world, ethics let what cannot be said possible as foundation role in life. Therefore logic as a foundation of world and ethics as a foundation of life are rounded what can be said and what cannot be said as a whole. Formal language and ordinary language are in communion with what can be said. Wittgenstein’s philosophical method could be the way to show limit of language and beyond of limit of language at the same time. The philosophical problems which were fallen under a language spell were banished to philosophical field as soon as turn out to be pseudo-problems. Duplication between horizon of logic and life present world of meaning from horizon of logic and life. Now, we can clarify the division what we can said and what we cannot said. In conclusion, Wittgenstein can be said to have presented with a philosophical method to analyze the structure of world by way of showing and description.
      번역하기

      Wittgenstein thinks that the problems of philosophy come from the misunderstanding of the logic and grammar of our language. It is something that can be resolved with the correct logical point of view or perspicuous perspective. His philosophical work...

      Wittgenstein thinks that the problems of philosophy come from the misunderstanding of the logic and grammar of our language. It is something that can be resolved with the correct logical point of view or perspicuous perspective. His philosophical work aims to reveal the illicitness of the philosophical problems and to dissolve those problems by the philosophical elucidation. He carries through the way of critique of language.
      It is widely acknowledged that Wittgenstein’s work is punctuated by a radical shift dividing it into an early and late period. Nevertheless, while from a doctrinal point of view this would seem to be undeniable, the possibility remains that Wittgenstein’s work reveals the continuity of the development of a certain problematic. Now, This is suggested by the same method in early and late period. For the more, his method duplicate the process to elucidate the problems and purpose to discover. This is a philosophizing on the way(μετ? οδ??) to the purpose.
      This structure of philosophical method is developed by oppositional relations. This composed of two axis what can be said and what cannot be said. The world be logical and ethical form. Logic make what can be said been as a foundation of world, ethics let what cannot be said possible as foundation role in life. Therefore logic as a foundation of world and ethics as a foundation of life are rounded what can be said and what cannot be said as a whole. Formal language and ordinary language are in communion with what can be said. Wittgenstein’s philosophical method could be the way to show limit of language and beyond of limit of language at the same time. The philosophical problems which were fallen under a language spell were banished to philosophical field as soon as turn out to be pseudo-problems. Duplication between horizon of logic and life present world of meaning from horizon of logic and life. Now, we can clarify the division what we can said and what we cannot said. In conclusion, Wittgenstein can be said to have presented with a philosophical method to analyze the structure of world by way of showing and description.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • [논문개요]
      • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
      • Ⅱ. 철학적 방법의 의미
      • Ⅲ. 철학적 방법의 구조
      • Ⅳ. 철학적 방법의 도식
      • [논문개요]
      • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
      • Ⅱ. 철학적 방법의 의미
      • Ⅲ. 철학적 방법의 구조
      • Ⅳ. 철학적 방법의 도식
      • Ⅴ. 맺는 말
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼