웹기반 강의지원시스템에 대한 대학교수의 활용도분석 = Utility Analysis on Activating Web-Based Course Support System by Faculty in Universities

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 4년제 대학에서 교수자에 따른 웹기반 강의지원시스템의 활용도를 분석하였다. 수집 자료는 수도권 S대학, D대학, K대학의 2009년1학기 강의에서 담당교수 5,023명과 12,733강좌를 대상으로 웹기반 수업지원시스템의 활용도를 서버에 저장된 로그파일을 이용하여 분석하였다. 구체적으로 교수자 및 계열별 강좌의 웹기반 수업지원시스템의 활용빈도 및 백분율을 제시하였다. 뿐만 아니라 수업지원시스템의 주요기능의 활용빈도 및 백분율이 분석되었고, 주요기능 중 공지사항, 수업자료, 공유게시판, 자유게시판 이용횟수에 대하여 교수자 및 계열별 이용횟수에 대하여 카이분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과 전체교수자의 62.28%와 전체강좌의 50.3%가 웹기반 수업지원시스템을 활용하였다. 주요 기능의 이용도를 분석한 결과 수업자료공유의 목적이 43.8%로 가장 높았으며, 공지사항이나 토론 기능의 이용은 다소 낮은 편이다. 이는 대부분의 교수자나 강좌에서 웹기반수업지원 시스템을 오프라인수업의 보충적 수단으로 활용하고 있어 실제적인 운용과 설계가 요구된다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

To purpose of the study was to analyze faculty utility of Web-Based course support system in Universities. Data were collected from log file in server computer, 5,023 faculties and 12,733 courses offered at spring semester of 2009 in the Metropolitan area S, K, D universities were analyzed. Specifically, frequency and percentile of faculties and courses using course management system were analyzed. In addition, the frequencies and percentiles of courses using sub-functions of course management system were analyzed and X2 test used to examine the difference of frequencies of faculties and courses using course system at using announcement, providing instructional material, public bulletin board and free board. Results were as follows. The 62.28% of faculties and 50.3% of courses have used Web-Based course support system. The results of Subfunction utility analysis showed the highest use as 80.4%. in providing instructional material. However, the use of announcement functions and online discussion was more or less low. Results imply that most of faculties and course are using course management system as supplementary system of off-line instruction.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한국교육학술정보원, "학습관리시스템(LMS/LCMS)기능설계 연구보고서" 88-95, 2004

2 하인애, "이러닝 시스템에서 온라인 비디오 강좌의 협업적 추천 방법" 한국컴퓨터정보학회 14 (14): 85-94, 2009

3 교육인적자원부, "대학정보화 활성화종합계획" 교과부 2007

4 성규석, "대학에서 웹기반 교수학습지원시스템 활용실태 및 학습자인식" 계명대학교 2006

5 강명희, "내외가상교육운영시스템사례를 통한 교수-학습지원 기능비교" 2 (2): 31-50, 2005

6 Falvo, D.A., "Use and implementation of learning management systems in the US. paper presented at the Society for information Technology and Teacher Education" 221-235, 2007

7 Ansorge, C. J., "The pedagogical impact of course management systems on faculty, students and institutions" Information Age Publishers 156-178, 2008

8 Kendall, M., "Teaching online to campus-based students" 21 (21): 314-327, 2007

9 Lynch, D., "Professors should embrace technology in course" 55 : 34-42, 2008

10 Byers, C., "Interactive assessment: An approach to enhance teaching and learning" 12 (12): 336-351, 2007

11 Papo, W., "Integration of educational media in higher education large classes" 40 (40): 101-121, 2007

12 Saunders, G., "Integratingtechnology into a traditional learning environment: Reasons for and risks of success" 3 : 87-93, 2007

13 Morgan G., "Faculty use of course management systems" Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE: Center for Applied Research 321-342, 2007

14 Morgan, G., "Faculty use of course management systems" Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research 234-253, 2008

15 Malikowski, S.R, "External factors associated with adopting a CMS in resident college course" 9 : 167-178, 2007

16 Allen, L.E., "Entering themainstream; The quality and extent of omline education in the United States 2005 and 2006" Sloan Center for Online Education 7-11, 2006

17 Harrignton, C.F., "Course management system utilization implications for practice" Information Age Publishers 56-67, 2007

18 Novitzki, J.E., "Asynchronous learning tolls in the traditional classroom-A preliminary study on their effect" 2008

19 Bate, Peter J., "A study into TV-based interactive learning to the home" PJB Associates 123-135, 2003

20 Malikowski, S.R., "A model for research into course management systems: Bridging technology and learning theory" 36 (36): 138-162, 2007