RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      ILO 기본협약의 의의와 비준 방향 = Implications in the ratification of the fundamental ILO Conventions and its consequences for the Korean Labour Law System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106356878

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Among the fundamental Conventions in the International Labour Organization(‘ILO’), Korea has not yet ratified the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) and the Right to Organise and Collective Bar...

      Among the fundamental Conventions in the International Labour Organization(‘ILO’), Korea has not yet ratified the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) and the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98) in the field of the freedom of association. As the Korean Government appears to keep its promises for the ratification of these Conventions, the obstacles to the ratification needs to be identified in law as well as in practices in the light of international labour standards. For this purpose, firstly this article tries to focus on the implication of the ratification of fundamental Conventions to the Korean legislation and practices. After exploring the background of ‘core labour standards’ and the adoption of the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work in 1998 which have played a significant role to clarify the international labour standards, this article identifies several legal and practical issues in Korean labour system presumably in conflict with the international labour standards. Lastly, it suggests several alternatives to resolves these conflicts and obstacles to the ratification of these fundamental conventions.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이승욱, "국제노동기준의 동요 ― 결사의 자유와 파업권의 관계 ―" 한국노동법학회 (62) : 91-127, 2017

      2 Steve Charnovitz, "Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance" 18 : 183-, 1997

      3 Jan Orbie, "The New GSP+ Beneficiaries: Ticking the Box or Truly Consistent with ILO Findings" 14 (14): 2009

      4 Gerry Rodgers, "The International Labour Organization and the Quest for Social Justice 1919-2009" ILR Press 2009

      5 Janice R. Bellace, "The ILO Declaration of Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work" 17 : 269-, 2001

      6 ILO, "Standard Setting and Globalization" 1997

      7 Philip Alston, "Social Issures, Globalisation and International Institutions" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2006

      8 Francis Maupain, "Revitalization Not Retreat: The Real Potential of the 1998ILO Declaration for the Universal Protection of Workers' Rights" 16 : 450-, 2005

      9 ILO, "Provisional Record of Proceedings" 1998

      10 Lucio Baccaro, "Pathology of Path Dependency? The ILO and the Challenge of New Governance" 65 : 195-, 2012

      1 이승욱, "국제노동기준의 동요 ― 결사의 자유와 파업권의 관계 ―" 한국노동법학회 (62) : 91-127, 2017

      2 Steve Charnovitz, "Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance" 18 : 183-, 1997

      3 Jan Orbie, "The New GSP+ Beneficiaries: Ticking the Box or Truly Consistent with ILO Findings" 14 (14): 2009

      4 Gerry Rodgers, "The International Labour Organization and the Quest for Social Justice 1919-2009" ILR Press 2009

      5 Janice R. Bellace, "The ILO Declaration of Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work" 17 : 269-, 2001

      6 ILO, "Standard Setting and Globalization" 1997

      7 Philip Alston, "Social Issures, Globalisation and International Institutions" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2006

      8 Francis Maupain, "Revitalization Not Retreat: The Real Potential of the 1998ILO Declaration for the Universal Protection of Workers' Rights" 16 : 450-, 2005

      9 ILO, "Provisional Record of Proceedings" 1998

      10 Lucio Baccaro, "Pathology of Path Dependency? The ILO and the Challenge of New Governance" 65 : 195-, 2012

      11 Frank Emmert, "Labor, Environmental Standards and World Trade Law" 10 : 75-, 2003

      12 Marley S. Weiss, "International Labor and Employment Law: From Periphery to Core" 25 : 487-, 2010

      13 Hector G. Bartolomei de la Cruz, "International Labor Organization:The International Standards System and Basic Human Rights" Westview Press 1996

      14 ITUC, "Global Rights Index 2017 : Violence and repression of workers on the rise" 2018

      15 International Labour Conference, "Giving globalization a human face, General Survey on the fundamental Conventions concerning rights at work in light of the ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, 2008" International Labour Office 2012

      16 Leary, Virgina, "Free Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade" MIT University Press 1996

      17 Philip Alston, "Facing Up to the Complexities of the ILO’s Core Labour Standards Agenda" 16 : 467-, 2005

      18 Clara Portela, "European Union Sanctios and Foreign Policy" Routledge 2010

      19 "European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, Promoting Core Labour Standards and Improving Social Governance in the Context of Globalisation 5"

      20 International Labour Office, "Eighty-Sixth Session, Record of Proceedings Volume I: Provisional Record Index of Speakers 20/3"

      21 Emmet O'Connor, "Edward Phelan and the ILO: The life and views of an international social actor" ILO 2009

      22 Philip Alston, "Core Labour Standards’ and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime" 15 : 497-, 2004

      23 ILO, "Compilation of decisions of the Committee on Freedom of Association" International Labour Office 2018

      24 Janice R. Bellace, "Achieving Social Justice: The Nexus Between The ILO's Fundamental Rights and Decent Work" 15 : 8-, 2011

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2019-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.09 1.09 0.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.89 0.82 1.527 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼