RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      아우구스티누스의 계층적 우주론 고찰 ― 죄론을 중심으로 = Augustine’s Appropriation of Hierarchical Cosmology: Concerning his Hamartiology

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108202109

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study examines Augustine's Neoplatonic hierarchical cosmology in relation to his hamartiology and suggests contributions, limits and implications of his doctrine. Augustine approaches the compatibility of God's omnipotence and the existence of evil through his Christianized Neoplatonic ontological hierarchy. The hierarchical cosmology is the central theological foundation that buttresses Augustine’s hamartiology. Augustine defines God as “One Supreme Being” and evil as “non-being” by locating God and evil in his hierarchical frame. The hierarchical cosmology supplies a logical tool for Augustine’s hamartiology and becomes an absolute standard to decide the scope and content of his doctrine of sin and evil.
      On the one hand, Augustine effectively explains the issue of theodicy and the phenomenon of evil by using his hierarchical cosmology. His understanding of evil and sin delivers the eschatological hope that the benevolent God finally defeats evil. He also supplies a persuasive perspective on the Christian notion of God and evil in front of the challenges of the heretic teachings of his time, like Manichaeism, employing his ontological system. Augustine keenly examines sin and evil's structure and characteristics through the lens of ontological hierarchy. On the other hand, however, his cosmology contains the weakness in which destructive evil and sin in the world can be understood as a mere side effect of humanity's misuse of free will by emphasizing evil as a rhetorical and eschatological non-being. Furthermore, his doctrine also contains the risk in which the members of the human race can be hierarchically categorized by one's race, gender and class. The study concludes that the doctrine of “ontological hierarchy” or “order of creation” needs to be reinterpreted in light of the message of “new creation” testified in the Bible.
      번역하기

      This study examines Augustine's Neoplatonic hierarchical cosmology in relation to his hamartiology and suggests contributions, limits and implications of his doctrine. Augustine approaches the compatibility of God's omnipotence and the existence of ev...

      This study examines Augustine's Neoplatonic hierarchical cosmology in relation to his hamartiology and suggests contributions, limits and implications of his doctrine. Augustine approaches the compatibility of God's omnipotence and the existence of evil through his Christianized Neoplatonic ontological hierarchy. The hierarchical cosmology is the central theological foundation that buttresses Augustine’s hamartiology. Augustine defines God as “One Supreme Being” and evil as “non-being” by locating God and evil in his hierarchical frame. The hierarchical cosmology supplies a logical tool for Augustine’s hamartiology and becomes an absolute standard to decide the scope and content of his doctrine of sin and evil.
      On the one hand, Augustine effectively explains the issue of theodicy and the phenomenon of evil by using his hierarchical cosmology. His understanding of evil and sin delivers the eschatological hope that the benevolent God finally defeats evil. He also supplies a persuasive perspective on the Christian notion of God and evil in front of the challenges of the heretic teachings of his time, like Manichaeism, employing his ontological system. Augustine keenly examines sin and evil's structure and characteristics through the lens of ontological hierarchy. On the other hand, however, his cosmology contains the weakness in which destructive evil and sin in the world can be understood as a mere side effect of humanity's misuse of free will by emphasizing evil as a rhetorical and eschatological non-being. Furthermore, his doctrine also contains the risk in which the members of the human race can be hierarchically categorized by one's race, gender and class. The study concludes that the doctrine of “ontological hierarchy” or “order of creation” needs to be reinterpreted in light of the message of “new creation” testified in the Bible.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼