RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Endogenous Effort and Intersectoral Labour Transfers Under Industrialization = Endogenous Effort and Intersectoral Labour Transfers Under Industrialization

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A87031336

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper takes as its point of departure the claim in the literature that strong Asian growth performance is accounted for largely by the accumulation of factor inputs (financial savings and human capital accumulation). This stands in sharp contrast...

      This paper takes as its point of departure the claim in the literature that strong Asian growth performance is accounted for largely by the accumulation of factor inputs (financial savings and human capital accumulation). This stands in sharp contrast to Polanyi`s (1944) interpretation of European growth being a “great transformation” from an agricultural to an industrial economy. Our objective is to find models in which intersectoral transfers in Asia do account for significant portions of observed growth performance, besides factor input growth and residually calculated productivity growth. We begin with traditional Lewis models, where an efficiency gain results from transferring labour from the traditional (family based) agricultural sector, in which labour receives its average product, to the modern (industrial) sector in which labourers are paid their marginal product. We show that as one moves closer to Pareto Optimality in this system (say by taxing the traditional sector`s output), there is a gain but this is typically small. We then formulate Lewis type models in which the product of effort and labour enters each sector`s production function, and individuals in the traditional sector only receive a fraction of the return to their incremental effort due to average product pricing of labour. In this case, the level of effort in each sector, is endogenously determined along with the intersectoral allocation of labour, since the representative household is modeled as having a utility function defined over goods along with the disutility of effort. Differences in effort levels across sectors support accompanying differences in average and marginal products of labour. We use this model to analyze growth processes in Thailand and South Korea over the period between the 1960s and 1990s. Results suggest significant contributions to growth from intersectoral labour transfers in Lewis models with endogenous effort, and negligible contributions from models without endogenous effort.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Young, "” A Tale of Two Cities" MIT Press nber macroeco (nber macroeco): 1992

      2 Bonin, "“Work Incentives and Uncertainty on a Collective Farm”" 77-97, 1977

      3 Kim, "“The Sources of Economic Growth of the East Asian Newly Industrialized Countries” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies" 235-71, 1994

      4 McCombie, "“The Productivity Slowdown of the Advanced Countries”" australian eco (australian eco): 70-85, 1991

      5 Krugman, "“The Myth of Asia’s Miracle”" me 73 : 62-78, 1994

      6 Whalley, "“The Impact of China’s Economic Reformson Agricultural Productivity Growth” Journal of Political Economy" MacMillan 782-807, 1989

      7 Chinn, "“Team Cohesion and Collective Labour Supply in ChineseAgriculture” Journal of Comparative Economics" 375-394, 1979

      8 McCombie, "“On the Quantitative Importance of Kaldor’s Laws” Bulletin of Economic Research" 1980

      9 Young, "“Lessons from the East Asian NICs" 1994

      10 Liu, "“Intersectoral Labour Allocation on China’s Communes Journal of Comparative Economics" 602-626, 1991

      1 Young, "” A Tale of Two Cities" MIT Press nber macroeco (nber macroeco): 1992

      2 Bonin, "“Work Incentives and Uncertainty on a Collective Farm”" 77-97, 1977

      3 Kim, "“The Sources of Economic Growth of the East Asian Newly Industrialized Countries” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies" 235-71, 1994

      4 McCombie, "“The Productivity Slowdown of the Advanced Countries”" australian eco (australian eco): 70-85, 1991

      5 Krugman, "“The Myth of Asia’s Miracle”" me 73 : 62-78, 1994

      6 Whalley, "“The Impact of China’s Economic Reformson Agricultural Productivity Growth” Journal of Political Economy" MacMillan 782-807, 1989

      7 Chinn, "“Team Cohesion and Collective Labour Supply in ChineseAgriculture” Journal of Comparative Economics" 375-394, 1979

      8 McCombie, "“On the Quantitative Importance of Kaldor’s Laws” Bulletin of Economic Research" 1980

      9 Young, "“Lessons from the East Asian NICs" 1994

      10 Liu, "“Intersectoral Labour Allocation on China’s Communes Journal of Comparative Economics" 602-626, 1991

      11 Bradley, "“Incentives and Labour Supply on Soviet Collective Farms” Canadian Journal of Economics" 342-52, 1971

      12 Ireland, "“Incentives and Efficiency in the Kosygin Reforms” Journal of Comparative Economics" 33-39, 1980

      13 Lewis, "“Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of labour” The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies" 139-91, 1954

      14 International Labour Organization, "Yearbook of Labour Statistics" 13 (13): 324-340, 1996

      15 Rodrik, Dani, "The ‘Paradoxes’ of the Successful State" 41 : 411-442, 1997

      16 Young, A., "The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience" 110 : 641-80, 1995

      17 Kim, "The Role of Human Capital in the Economic Growth of East Asian Newly Industrialized Countries" Standard University 1993

      18 Main Aggregates, "Statistical Yearbook for Asia and the Pacific Yearbook of National Accounts Statistics" United Nations United Nations 19751978

      19 "Statistical Yearbook for Asia and the Pacific" United Nations 1980

      20 United Nations, "Statistical Yearbook for Asia and the Pacific" United Nations 1996

      21 Chenery, "Patterns of Development 1950-1970 Oxford University Press for the Worldbank" 1975

      22 Mansur, "Numerical Specification of Applied GeneralEquilibrium Models" Cambridge University Press 1984

      23 Tsao, "Growth and Productivity in Singapore" Singapore National University 1982

      24 Brooke, Anthony, "Generalized Algebraic" The Scientific Press, USA 1997

      25 John C, "Development of the Labour Surplus Economy" Yale University Inc eco illi (eco illi): 1964

      26 Louis, "A Model of Producer Institutional Choice” Journal of Comparative Economics" ntary collectivization : 125-157, 1980

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-06-07 학회명변경 한글명 : 국제경제연구소 -> 경제통합연구소
      영문명 : Center for International Economics -> Journal of Economic Integration
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.11 0.11 0.13
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.11 0.279 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼