RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Scriptural Words and Silence: Interpretation of Nirvāṇic Language in Prajñā Hermeneutics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104527574

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper deals with the hermeneutical relationship between scriptural
      language and ultimate meaning as it is conveyed in Buddhist texts. Our frame
      of reference is the Prajñā-Mādhyamika. In Buddhist understanding, speech and
      words are considered only as a means or path (mārga), to understanding,
      rather than reality itself. The Buddha exhorted his disciples to be cautious
      with scripture, not merely clinging to his words as literal, but reflecting on
      their interpretative meaning. The search for meaning in Buddhist scriptures is
      a hermeneutical endeavor which seeks to reinterpret the speaker’s intent.
      Buddhist commentarial traditions have tried to clarify the words of the
      Buddha. But the Buddha’s words are only a means or signpost to
      experiencing the reality of things as they truly are. In most Prajñā texts, the
      masters abandoned their efforts to grasp ultimate meaning through literal
      texts, and instead, attempted to understand through a reinterpretation of
      scripture. Thus, the Mādhyamika system presents a paradox between letters
      and meaning, in both positive and negative relationship with each other.
      번역하기

      This paper deals with the hermeneutical relationship between scriptural language and ultimate meaning as it is conveyed in Buddhist texts. Our frame of reference is the Prajñā-Mādhyamika. In Buddhist understanding, speech and words are considered o...

      This paper deals with the hermeneutical relationship between scriptural
      language and ultimate meaning as it is conveyed in Buddhist texts. Our frame
      of reference is the Prajñā-Mādhyamika. In Buddhist understanding, speech and
      words are considered only as a means or path (mārga), to understanding,
      rather than reality itself. The Buddha exhorted his disciples to be cautious
      with scripture, not merely clinging to his words as literal, but reflecting on
      their interpretative meaning. The search for meaning in Buddhist scriptures is
      a hermeneutical endeavor which seeks to reinterpret the speaker’s intent.
      Buddhist commentarial traditions have tried to clarify the words of the
      Buddha. But the Buddha’s words are only a means or signpost to
      experiencing the reality of things as they truly are. In most Prajñā texts, the
      masters abandoned their efforts to grasp ultimate meaning through literal
      texts, and instead, attempted to understand through a reinterpretation of
      scripture. Thus, the Mādhyamika system presents a paradox between letters
      and meaning, in both positive and negative relationship with each other.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Huntington,C. W., Jr., "“nonreferetial” view of language and conceptualthought in the work of Tsong-kha-pa" 33 : 325-339, 1983

      2 Gudmunsen, C., "Wittgenstein and Buddhism" Barnes andNoble Books 1979

      3 Buddhaghosa, "Visuddhimagga xvi: 66 (The Path of Purification)" 1965

      4 Thurman,Robert A., "Tsong Khapa’s Speech of Gold in the Essence ofTrue Eloguence" Princeton Univ. Press 1984

      5 Nagao, Gadjin., "The Silence of the Buddha and MadhyamikaInterpretation" Gadjin Nagao and JoshoNozawa 1955

      6 Thurman,Robert A., "The Holy Teaching of Vimalakirti" The Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.

      7 De Bary, "The Buddhist Tradition in India, China and Japan" 1972

      8 "Ta-ch’eng-hsuan-lun (大乘玄論)" 45 (45):

      9 Nāgārjuna, "Ta-chih-tu-lun (Mahā-prajñāpāramitā-śastra, 大智度論)" 25 (25): 1970

      10 Williams, Paul M, "Some Aspects of Language and Construction in Madhyamika" 8 : 1980

      1 Huntington,C. W., Jr., "“nonreferetial” view of language and conceptualthought in the work of Tsong-kha-pa" 33 : 325-339, 1983

      2 Gudmunsen, C., "Wittgenstein and Buddhism" Barnes andNoble Books 1979

      3 Buddhaghosa, "Visuddhimagga xvi: 66 (The Path of Purification)" 1965

      4 Thurman,Robert A., "Tsong Khapa’s Speech of Gold in the Essence ofTrue Eloguence" Princeton Univ. Press 1984

      5 Nagao, Gadjin., "The Silence of the Buddha and MadhyamikaInterpretation" Gadjin Nagao and JoshoNozawa 1955

      6 Thurman,Robert A., "The Holy Teaching of Vimalakirti" The Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.

      7 De Bary, "The Buddhist Tradition in India, China and Japan" 1972

      8 "Ta-ch’eng-hsuan-lun (大乘玄論)" 45 (45):

      9 Nāgārjuna, "Ta-chih-tu-lun (Mahā-prajñāpāramitā-śastra, 大智度論)" 25 (25): 1970

      10 Williams, Paul M, "Some Aspects of Language and Construction in Madhyamika" 8 : 1980

      11 Mitsuyosh, Saigusa, "Sanran gengi In: Butten Koza, no. 27" DaiShuppan-sha. 1971

      12 "San-lun-hsuan-i (三論玄義)" 45 (45):

      13 Candrakirti, "Prasannapadā(The Lucid Exposition of the MiddleWay)" Routedge and Kegan Paul 1979

      14 Yadav, Bibhuti S, "Nirvana, Negation and Nonsense" 45 : 1977

      15 Kalupahana,David J., "Nagarjuna: The Philosophy of the Middle Way" SUNY Press 1986

      16 Innada,Kenneth K., "Nagarjuna: Mulamadhyamakarika" TheHokuseido Press. 1970

      17 Nāgārjuna, "Mūla-madhyamka-kārikā (MMK)" The Hokuseido Press 1970

      18 Yadav, Bibhuti S, "Methodic Deconstruction. In: Interpretation ofReligion" Brill 1992

      19 Yadav, Bibhuti S, "Methidic Deconstrution" Unpublished article 1989

      20 Daye, Douglas D., "Major Schools of Mahāyāna: Mādhyamika. InBuddhism: A Modern Perspective" Pennsylvania State Univ.Press. 1975

      21 Sprung, Mervyn, "Lucid Exposition of the Middle Way: The EssentialChapters from the Prasannapada of Candrakirti(PSP)" Prajna Press 1979

      22 Lamotte, Etienne, "La critique d’interpretation dans le bouddisme" 9 : 341-361, 1949

      23 Yong-pyo Kim, "Hermeneutical Circle of Prajna-Paramita Thought in Candrakirti and Seungnang" 국제불교문화사상사학회 1 : 103-119, 2002

      24 "Erh-ti-i (二諦義)" 45 (45):

      25 Streng Frederick J., "Emptiness: A Study in Religions Meaning" Abingdon Press. 1975

      26 Robinson, Richard, "Early Mādhyamika in India and China" Univ. of Wisconsin Press 1967

      27 Ui, Hakuju, "Daijo genran kokuyaku issaikyo. Shoshubu, vol. 1" Dai Shuppan 1965

      28 Nāgārjuna, "Chung-lun [Mula-madhyama-karika" 30 (30): 1970

      29 Hirai, Shunei, "Chugoku hannya shisoshi kenkyu: Kichizo to Sanrongakuha" Shunjusha 1976

      30 Koseki, Aaron, "Chi-tsang’s Ta-ch’eng-hsuan-lun: The Two Truthsand the Buddha-nature" Univ. of Wisconsin 1977

      31 "Chi-tsang Chung-kuan-lun-shu (中觀論疏)" 42 (42):

      32 Thurman,Robert A., "Buddhst Hermeneutics" 46 : 19-39, 1978

      33 Lopez,Donald S., Jr., "Buddhist Hermeneutics" Univ. of Hawaii Press 1988

      34 Webb, Sara Boin, "Assessment of Textual Interpretation in Buddhism" 2 : 4-24, 1985

      35 Streng Frederick J, "1967Metaphysics, Negative Dialectic and the Expressionof the Inexpressible" 25 : 1967

      36 Ramanan, Venkata, "1966Nāgārjuna’s Philosophy as Presented in theMahā-prajñāpāramitā-śastra. Rutland" Charles E. Tuttle Company 1966

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.07 0.07 0.11
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.08 0.06 0.384 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼