RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한반도 평화체제 만들기의 국제정치적 기원: 북한자료를 통해서 본 정전협정 4조 60항의 합의과정 = An International Political Origin of Making a Peace on the Korean Peninsula

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper analyzes the micro-process of the formation of Article 4, Paragraph 60 of the Armistice Agreement, focusing on North Korean data produced during the Armistice Negotiations. Article 4, paragraph 60 stipulated that a political conference shou...

      This paper analyzes the micro-process of the formation of Article 4, Paragraph 60 of the Armistice Agreement, focusing on North Korean data produced during the Armistice Negotiations. Article 4, paragraph 60 stipulated that a political conference should be held after the signing of the Armistice Agreement to discuss the withdrawal of foreign troops on the Korean peninsula, the peaceful settlement of the Korean question, etc. In other words, Article 4, paragraph 60 is the basis for international law that makes the replacement of the Armistice Agreement into a peace agreement on the agenda. Existing research sees Article 4, paragraph 60 of the Armistice Agreement as the United States’ acceptance of the communists’ proposal or the product of a compromise between the two camps over the withdrawal of foreign troops. The peculiarity of this article is that it refers to the withdrawal of foreign troops, unlike other armistice agreements that include a peaceful settlement within the armistice. It is also noteworthy that the withdrawal of foreign troops from the Korean Peninsula is an agenda that North Korea claimed on even before the Korean War. North Korea, which defined the Korean War as a civil war, insisted on immediate withdrawal of foreign troops along with China during the armistice negotiations, but the U.S. refused to accept it. The agenda of East Asian regional issues related to peace on the Korean Peninsula raised by North Korea and China was dealt with as ‘etc.’ due to the opposition from the U.S.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼