RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      응급 수술이 어려운 급성 담석동반 담낭염 환자에서 내시경적 경유두 담낭 배액술의 유용성

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15524814

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background and Objectives: Endoscopic trans-papillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) has been proposed as an alternative to surgery or percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute calculus cholecystitis (ACC). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ETGBD via endoscopic trans-papillary gallbladder stenting (ETGBS) or endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage (ENGBD) as either a bridging or a definitive treatment option for patients with ACC when a cholecystectomy is delayed or cannot be performed.
      Materials and Methods: From July 2014 to December 2018, 171 patients with ACC in whom ETGBD were attempted were retrospectively reviewed. The technical and clinical success rates and adverse events were evaluated. The predictive factors for technical success and the stent patency in the ETGBS group with high surgical risks were also examined.
      Results: The technical and clinical success rates for ETGBD were 90.6% (155/171) and 99.3% (154/155), respectively. Visible cystic duct on cholangiography were significant predictors of technical success (adjusted odds ratio: 7.099, 95% confidence interval: 1.983–25.407, P = 0.003) as per logistic regression analysis. Adverse events occurred in 8.1% of patients (14/171: mild pancreatitis, n = 9; post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding, n = 4; and stent migration, n = 1), but all patients were treated using conservative management. In the ETGBS group, the median stent patency in 70 patients with high surgical risks was 503 days (interquartile range: 404.25–775 days). Among them, one patient (1.4%, 1/70) had ACC recurrence at post procedure day 43 and six patients (8.5%, 6/70) developed acute cholangitis with choledocholithiasis at 150, 221, 299, 346, 381, and 399 days after ETGBS. All patients with recurrent ACC or occurrence of acute cholangitis were successfully retreated endoscopically.
      Conclusion: ETGBD, using either ETGBS or ENGBD, may be a suitable bridging option for patients with ACC unfit for urgent cholecystectomy. In patients with high surgical risks, ETGBS may be a promising useful treatment modality with low ACC recurrence.
      번역하기

      Background and Objectives: Endoscopic trans-papillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) has been proposed as an alternative to surgery or percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute calculus cholecystitis (ACC). We aimed to evaluate the safety and ...

      Background and Objectives: Endoscopic trans-papillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) has been proposed as an alternative to surgery or percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute calculus cholecystitis (ACC). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ETGBD via endoscopic trans-papillary gallbladder stenting (ETGBS) or endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage (ENGBD) as either a bridging or a definitive treatment option for patients with ACC when a cholecystectomy is delayed or cannot be performed.
      Materials and Methods: From July 2014 to December 2018, 171 patients with ACC in whom ETGBD were attempted were retrospectively reviewed. The technical and clinical success rates and adverse events were evaluated. The predictive factors for technical success and the stent patency in the ETGBS group with high surgical risks were also examined.
      Results: The technical and clinical success rates for ETGBD were 90.6% (155/171) and 99.3% (154/155), respectively. Visible cystic duct on cholangiography were significant predictors of technical success (adjusted odds ratio: 7.099, 95% confidence interval: 1.983–25.407, P = 0.003) as per logistic regression analysis. Adverse events occurred in 8.1% of patients (14/171: mild pancreatitis, n = 9; post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding, n = 4; and stent migration, n = 1), but all patients were treated using conservative management. In the ETGBS group, the median stent patency in 70 patients with high surgical risks was 503 days (interquartile range: 404.25–775 days). Among them, one patient (1.4%, 1/70) had ACC recurrence at post procedure day 43 and six patients (8.5%, 6/70) developed acute cholangitis with choledocholithiasis at 150, 221, 299, 346, 381, and 399 days after ETGBS. All patients with recurrent ACC or occurrence of acute cholangitis were successfully retreated endoscopically.
      Conclusion: ETGBD, using either ETGBS or ENGBD, may be a suitable bridging option for patients with ACC unfit for urgent cholecystectomy. In patients with high surgical risks, ETGBS may be a promising useful treatment modality with low ACC recurrence.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract ii
      • Abbreviation list iv
      • Introduction 1
      • Materials and Methods 3
      • Results 6
      • Abstract ii
      • Abbreviation list iv
      • Introduction 1
      • Materials and Methods 3
      • Results 6
      • Discussion 9
      • References 14
      • Tables 18
      • Figures 23
      • 국문초록 27
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼