This article reviewed the life of Kim Si-Yang (金時讓), and his historical consciousness by analyzing his writings, namely, the Baegyegimun (涪溪紀聞), the Jahaepildam (紫海筆談), and the Hadampasuklok (荷潭破寂錄), etc. Kim was a Conf...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102162037
2016
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
29-54(26쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This article reviewed the life of Kim Si-Yang (金時讓), and his historical consciousness by analyzing his writings, namely, the Baegyegimun (涪溪紀聞), the Jahaepildam (紫海筆談), and the Hadampasuklok (荷潭破寂錄), etc. Kim was a Conf...
This article reviewed the life of Kim Si-Yang (金時讓), and his historical consciousness by analyzing his writings, namely, the Baegyegimun (涪溪紀聞), the Jahaepildam (紫海筆談), and the Hadampasuklok (荷潭破寂錄), etc. Kim was a Confucian scholar who lived throughout the late 16th century and mid-17th century, enduring the time of hardship. In 1612 (4th year by the reign of King Gwanghae), he was exiled to Jongseong, Hamgyeong-do, for posing a ’tabooed question’ for an official examination. In 1618, after 7 years of exile in Jongseong, Kim was relocated to Yeonghae, Gyeongsangbuk-do, before being released from the exile in 1623 due to the Restoration by King Injo. For the 12 years of poor and miserable exile, he devoted himself to researches, enhancing his knowledge and view on the Korean history. In other words, it was the time of the exile that offered Kim a chance to crystallize his thoughts and experiences to write the three books that gained much praise by his successors.
Kim viewed the reality of his era, as well as the contemporary Confucian scholars, with differentiated view and criticism. He lamented on the reality where the descendents of the unjust thrive and the descendents of the righteous declined, and emphasized that the reason behind the paradox are lack of historical consciousness and unjust publication of Korean history. In particular, Kim stressed that the Confucian scholars of Joseon lacked education on the history of Joseon, and rather, propagated incorrect historical knowledge. In his point of view, the history education of Joseon didn’t serve its function as mirror of politics and ethics, and he wrote the books in order to correct the errors. Kim may have lived a bitter personal life during the time of national hardship, but he tried his best to keep his criticism on the era and serve his responsibility in the Korean history.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 정수환, "李道長의承政院日記" 한국학중앙연구원 2010
2 정호훈, "조선후기 당쟁과 기록의 정치성 - ‘기축옥사’ 희생자의 가해자 공방과 관련하여 -" 한국사학사학회 (33) : 151-186, 2016
3 "조선문과방목"
4 허태용, "임진왜란의 경험과 고구려사 인식의 강화" 역사학회 (190) : 33-60, 2006
5 "인조실록"
6 "승정원일기"
7 "국역 대동야승"
8 "광해군일기"
9 신병주, "광해군대의 정국과 李德馨의 정치, 외교 활동" 조선시대사학회 (67) : 215-253, 2013
10 정구복, "韓國近世史學史-朝鮮中・後期篇-" 경인문화사 2008
1 정수환, "李道長의承政院日記" 한국학중앙연구원 2010
2 정호훈, "조선후기 당쟁과 기록의 정치성 - ‘기축옥사’ 희생자의 가해자 공방과 관련하여 -" 한국사학사학회 (33) : 151-186, 2016
3 "조선문과방목"
4 허태용, "임진왜란의 경험과 고구려사 인식의 강화" 역사학회 (190) : 33-60, 2006
5 "인조실록"
6 "승정원일기"
7 "국역 대동야승"
8 "광해군일기"
9 신병주, "광해군대의 정국과 李德馨의 정치, 외교 활동" 조선시대사학회 (67) : 215-253, 2013
10 정구복, "韓國近世史學史-朝鮮中・後期篇-" 경인문화사 2008
11 "藫庭遺藁"
12 "荷潭金時讓文集"
13 "荷潭破寂錄"
14 "紫海筆談"
15 "筆苑雜記"
16 "涪溪紀聞"
17 "月汀漫筆"
18 "慵齋叢話"
19 "南冥集"
20 "五洲衍文長箋散稿"
21 金素銀, "16세기 兩班家의 婚姻과 家族關係-李文楗의 『默齋日記』를중심으로-" 97 : 2001
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2019 | 평가예정 | 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가) | |
2018-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가) | |
2017-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2009-08-25 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : (사)한국인물사연구소 -> (사)한국인물사연구회 | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.73 | 0.64 | 1.883 | 0.18 |