RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      朝鮮後期의 邊境意識 = Irredentic Tendency of Late Yi Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82685779

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In 1712 A. D. the Manchu Emperor Seng Tsu(聖祖) made several sur―veys of Mt. Paektu(白頭山) as he thought that his Manchu ancestors origina ly from there. He sent Mu K’o-teng(穆克登) an envoy and fol―lowing negotiation with neighbouring ...

      In 1712 A. D. the Manchu Emperor Seng Tsu(聖祖) made several sur―veys of Mt. Paektu(白頭山) as he thought that his Manchu ancestors origina ly from there. He sent Mu K’o-teng(穆克登) an envoy and fol―lowing negotiation with neighbouring Korea, built a demarcation stone there. This is the first governmental demarcation stone ever built between Korea and China. As result of this negotiation the Korean boundary line was defined by the Yalu(鴨綠江) and T’umen Rive(土門江) both of which rose in the Mt. Paektu.
      However dissension and disputes persisted for some decades among Korean scholars of the Silhak(實學) School. Concerning the newly determined nationnal boundary towards the north-west had been reduced. they objected to the clause that made the T’umen River the north-west boundary. These same scholars, who may be classified irredentists. did not regard the T’umen River as the proper boundary.
      Instead one of these scholars. Hong Yangho(洪良浩) thought that boundary should extend from Mt. Paektu to the Sungari River(松花江), although Yi Ik(李瀷) and some other scholars maintained that the boundary should be the Sonchun Pass(先春嶺), which was 280 Kms from the Tuman River(豆滿江), while Sin Kyongchun(申景濬). Jong Yak-yong(丁若鏞) and Yi Kyukyong(李圭景) asserted it should be the Punkye River(分界江). They ardently wished for the recovery of the lost terri tory; this however could not be realized because of the military power of the Ch’ing dynasty. They charged Korean envoys with the responsibility of the reduction of the Korean territory.
      In Korea one of the features of the mounting nationalism of this peri-od was irredentism i.e. a strong determination to recover the territory which was lost at the negotiation of 1712 A.D. Although at this time the scholars of the Silhak school voiced the necessity of soidifing nati -onal defences, also the development of the four counties(廢四君) whi-ch were situated near the middle stream of the Yalu and were then uninhabited. In fact King Chongcho and others later undertook these project.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 緖言
      • 2. 邊境論者의 民族意識
      • 3. 東北邊境에 대한 理解
      • 4. 鴨綠江 沿邊에 대한 見解
      • 5. 結語
      • 1. 緖言
      • 2. 邊境論者의 民族意識
      • 3. 東北邊境에 대한 理解
      • 4. 鴨綠江 沿邊에 대한 見解
      • 5. 結語
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼