RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      A new methodology of the development of seismic fragility curves

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104816442

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      There are continuous efforts to mitigate structural losses from earthquakes and manage risk through seismic risk assessment; seismic fragility curves are widely accepted as an essential tool of such efforts. Seismic fragility curves can be classified into four groups based on how they are derived: empirical, judgmental, analytical, and hybrid. Analytical fragility curves are the most widely used and can be further categorized into two subgroups, depending on whether an analytical function or simulation method is used. Although both methods have shown decent performances for many seismic fragility problems, they often oversimplify the given problems in reliability or structural analyses owing to their built-in assumptions. In this paper, a new method is proposed for the development of seismic fragility curves. Integration with sophisticated software packages for reliability analysis (FERUM) and structural analysis (ZEUS-NL) allows the new method to obtain more accurate seismic fragility curves for less computational cost. Because the proposed method performs reliability analysis using the first-order reliability method, it provides component probabilities as well as useful byproducts and allows further fragility analysis at the system level. The new method was applied to a numerical example of a 2D frame structure, and the results were compared with those by Monte Carlo simulation. The method was found to generate seismic fragility curves more accurately and efficiently. Also, the effect of system reliability analysis on the development of seismic fragility curves was investigated using the given numerical example and its necessity was discussed.
      번역하기

      There are continuous efforts to mitigate structural losses from earthquakes and manage risk through seismic risk assessment; seismic fragility curves are widely accepted as an essential tool of such efforts. Seismic fragility curves can be classified ...

      There are continuous efforts to mitigate structural losses from earthquakes and manage risk through seismic risk assessment; seismic fragility curves are widely accepted as an essential tool of such efforts. Seismic fragility curves can be classified into four groups based on how they are derived: empirical, judgmental, analytical, and hybrid. Analytical fragility curves are the most widely used and can be further categorized into two subgroups, depending on whether an analytical function or simulation method is used. Although both methods have shown decent performances for many seismic fragility problems, they often oversimplify the given problems in reliability or structural analyses owing to their built-in assumptions. In this paper, a new method is proposed for the development of seismic fragility curves. Integration with sophisticated software packages for reliability analysis (FERUM) and structural analysis (ZEUS-NL) allows the new method to obtain more accurate seismic fragility curves for less computational cost. Because the proposed method performs reliability analysis using the first-order reliability method, it provides component probabilities as well as useful byproducts and allows further fragility analysis at the system level. The new method was applied to a numerical example of a 2D frame structure, and the results were compared with those by Monte Carlo simulation. The method was found to generate seismic fragility curves more accurately and efficiently. Also, the effect of system reliability analysis on the development of seismic fragility curves was investigated using the given numerical example and its necessity was discussed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Kwon, O.S., "effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure‖" 28 (28): 289-303, 2006

      2 Elnashai, A. S., "ZEUS NL - A System for Inelastic Analysis of Structures, User's manual" Mid-America Earthquake (MAE) Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA 2010

      3 Song, J., "System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrix-based system reliability method‖" 31 (31): 148-156, 2009

      4 Rackwitz, R., "Structural reliability under combined load sequences‖" 9 : 489-494, 1978

      5 Melchers, R. E., "Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction" John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA 1999

      6 Bracci, J. M., "Seismic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures Designed Only for Gravity Loads: Part I—Design and Properties of a One-third Scale Model Structure" Technical report, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY, USA 1992

      7 Lee, Y. J., "Risk analysis of fatigue-induced sequential failures by branch-and-bound method employing system reliability bounds‖" 137 (137): 807-821, 2011

      8 Haldar, A., "Recent developments in reliability-based civil engineering" World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore 2006

      9 Haldar, A., "Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design" John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA 2000

      10 Kwon, O. S., "Probabilistic seismic assessment of structure, foundation, and soil interacting systems" University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA, 2007

      1 Kwon, O.S., "effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure‖" 28 (28): 289-303, 2006

      2 Elnashai, A. S., "ZEUS NL - A System for Inelastic Analysis of Structures, User's manual" Mid-America Earthquake (MAE) Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA 2010

      3 Song, J., "System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrix-based system reliability method‖" 31 (31): 148-156, 2009

      4 Rackwitz, R., "Structural reliability under combined load sequences‖" 9 : 489-494, 1978

      5 Melchers, R. E., "Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction" John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA 1999

      6 Bracci, J. M., "Seismic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures Designed Only for Gravity Loads: Part I—Design and Properties of a One-third Scale Model Structure" Technical report, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY, USA 1992

      7 Lee, Y. J., "Risk analysis of fatigue-induced sequential failures by branch-and-bound method employing system reliability bounds‖" 137 (137): 807-821, 2011

      8 Haldar, A., "Recent developments in reliability-based civil engineering" World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore 2006

      9 Haldar, A., "Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design" John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA 2000

      10 Kwon, O. S., "Probabilistic seismic assessment of structure, foundation, and soil interacting systems" University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA, 2007

      11 Jeong, S., "Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities‖" 29 : 1238-1251, 2007

      12 Gollwitzer, S., "PERMAS-RA/STRUREL system of programs for probabilistic reliability analysis‖" 28 (28): 108-129, 2006

      13 DesRoches, R., "Overview of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake‖" 27 (27): 1-21, 2011

      14 Elnashai, A., "Overview and applications of MAEviz – HAZTURK 2007‖" 12 (12): 100-108, 2008

      15 Der Kiureghian, A., "Numerical methods in structural reliability‖" 1983

      16 Genz, A., "Numerical computation of multivariate normal probabilities‖" 141-149, 1992

      17 Ditlevsen, O., "Narrow reliability bounds for structural systems‖" 7 (7): 453-472, 1979

      18 SwRI, "NESSUS (ver 9.6), Southwest Research Institute"

      19 Ambartzumian, R., "Multinormal probability by sequential conditioned importance sampling: theory and application‖" 13 (13): 299-308, 1998

      20 NIBS, "HAZUS, Earthquake Loss Estimation Technology" Technical Manual prepared by the National Institute of Buildings Sciences (NIBS) for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 1999

      21 Kircher, C. A., "HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods‖" 7 (7): 45-59, 2006

      22 Kang, W. H., "Further development of matrix-based system reliability method and applications to structural systems" TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD 5 (5): 441-457, 2012

      23 Hohenbichler, H., "First-order concepts in system reliability‖" 1 (1): 177-188, 1983

      24 Der Kiureghian, A., "First- and second-order reliability methods, Engineering Design Reliability Handbook" CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA 2005

      25 Lee, Y. J., "Finite-element-based system reliability analysis of fatigue-induced sequential failures‖" 108 : 131-141, 2012

      26 Lee, Y. J., "Finite element system reliability analysis of a wing torque box‖" 2008

      27 Haukaas, T., "Finite element reliability and sensitivity methods for performance-based engineering‖" University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. 2003

      28 Kang, W. H., "Evaluation of multivariate normal integrals for general systems by sequential compounding‖" 32 (32): 35-41, 2010

      29 Calvi, G. M., "Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years‖" 43 (43): 75-104, 2006

      30 Kang, W. H., "Development and application of new system reliability analysis methods for complex infrastructure systems" University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA. 2011

      31 Rossetto, T., "Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data‖" 25 (25): 1241-1263, 2003

      32 Song, J., "Decision and Risk Analysis, Lecture notes"

      33 Liu, P. L., "CalREL User Manual. Report No. UCB/SEMM-89/18" University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA 1989

      34 Song, J, "Bounds on system reliability by linear programming‖" 129 (129): 627-636, 2003

      35 Pandey, M. D., "An effective approximation to evaluate multinormal integrals‖" 20 : 51-67, 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2021 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-12-01 평가 등재 탈락 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2013-10-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-11-01 학술지명변경 한글명 : 스마트 구조와 시스템 국제 학술지 -> Smart Structures and Systems, An International Journal KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2007-06-12 학술지등록 한글명 : 스마트 구조와 시스템 국제 학술지
      외국어명 : Smart Structures and Systems, An International Journal
      KCI등재후보
      2007-06-12 학술지등록 한글명 : 컴퓨터와 콘크리트 국제학술지
      외국어명 : Computers and Concrete, An International Journal
      KCI등재후보
      2007-04-09 학회명변경 한글명 : (사)국제구조공학회 -> 국제구조공학회 KCI등재후보
      2005-06-16 학회명변경 영문명 : Ternational Association Of Structural Engineering And Mechanics -> International Association of Structural Engineering And Mechanics KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 SCIE 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.17 0.44 1.04
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.97 0.88 0.318 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼