RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107357647

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      We evaluated the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. We applied both tests to patients who were about to be hospitalized, h...

      We evaluated the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. We applied both tests to patients who were about to be hospitalized, had visited an emergency room, or had been admitted due to COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR. Two nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained; one was tested by RT-PCR and the other by the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test. A total of 118 pairs of tests from 98 patients were performed between January 5 and 11, 2021. The overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test compared to RT-PCR were 17.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8–32.0%) and 100% (95% CI, 95.3–100.0%). Analysis of the results using RT-PCR cycle thresholds of ≤ 30 or ≤ 25 increased the sensitivity to 26.9% (95% CI, 13.7–46.1%), and 41.1% (95% CI, 21.6–64.0%), respectively.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Mina MJ, "Rethinking Covid-19 test sensitivity-a strategy for containment" 383 (383): e120-, 2020

      2 Candel FJ, "Recommendations for use of antigenic tests in the diagnosis of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in the second pandemic wave : attitude in different clinical settings" 33 (33): 466-484, 2020

      3 Pray IW, "Performance of an antigen-based test for asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing at two university campuses-Wisconsin, SeptemberOctober 2020" 69 (69): 1642-1647, 2021

      4 Dandan Li, "Immunologic Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Infection from the Antigen Perspective" American Society for Microbiology 59 (59): 2021

      5 Andreas K. Lindner, "Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected anterior nasal swab versus professionalcollected nasopharyngeal swab" European Respiratory Society (ERS) 57 (57): 2003961-, 2021

      6 Albert E, "Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test(Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device)for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres" 27 (27): 472-, 2021

      7 Krüger LJ, "Evaluation of the accuracy, ease of use and limit of detection of novel, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2"

      8 Toptan T, "Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: potential to help reduce community spread?" 135 : 104713-, 2021

      9 Yamayoshi S, "Comparison of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19" 12 (12): 1420-, 2020

      10 Turcato G, "Clinical application of a rapid antigen test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients evaluated in the emergency department : a preliminary report" 82 (82): e14-e16, 2021

      1 Mina MJ, "Rethinking Covid-19 test sensitivity-a strategy for containment" 383 (383): e120-, 2020

      2 Candel FJ, "Recommendations for use of antigenic tests in the diagnosis of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in the second pandemic wave : attitude in different clinical settings" 33 (33): 466-484, 2020

      3 Pray IW, "Performance of an antigen-based test for asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing at two university campuses-Wisconsin, SeptemberOctober 2020" 69 (69): 1642-1647, 2021

      4 Dandan Li, "Immunologic Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Infection from the Antigen Perspective" American Society for Microbiology 59 (59): 2021

      5 Andreas K. Lindner, "Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected anterior nasal swab versus professionalcollected nasopharyngeal swab" European Respiratory Society (ERS) 57 (57): 2003961-, 2021

      6 Albert E, "Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test(Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device)for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres" 27 (27): 472-, 2021

      7 Krüger LJ, "Evaluation of the accuracy, ease of use and limit of detection of novel, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2"

      8 Toptan T, "Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: potential to help reduce community spread?" 135 : 104713-, 2021

      9 Yamayoshi S, "Comparison of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19" 12 (12): 1420-, 2020

      10 Turcato G, "Clinical application of a rapid antigen test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients evaluated in the emergency department : a preliminary report" 82 (82): e14-e16, 2021

      11 "CDC's diagnostic test for COVID-19 only and supplies"

      12 Mak GC, "Analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity of the three rapid antigen detection kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus" 133 : 104684-, 2020

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 0.37 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.75 0.691 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼