법이 규율하는 사회 개념의 변화 -민사법을 예로 하여- = The Changes in the Concept of Society Regulated by Law - In case of civil law -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Law is often understood as a system of norms regulating society.
However, it is not necessarily clear what the concept of society exactly means in this context. This is because society is not only comprehensive in its meaning, but also pluralistic. Because of this, the meaning of society varies depending on what perspective the concept of society is understood. Because of that, the question of ‘society’ or ‘social’ is sometimes raised. In this context, this article examines how the meaning of society regulated by law has changed, especially the meaning of society regulated by civil law as an example. Traditionally, civil law was understood as a private law that regulates society, especially economic system. The society referred to at that time was a civil society centered on citizens. In this civil society, citizens are identified as free and formally equal persons. Accordingly, various differences that actually exist in society are excluded. Accordingly, civil law tried to maximize the freedom of society by assuming society as such a civil society.
However, the civil society project premised on the civil law should encounter some limitations in reality. To respond to this limitations, new thinking models and legal concepts have emerged.
Social law is one of examples. Unlike civil law, social law actively reveals the differences that exist in society. In addition, changes in the social structure show that the concept of civil society in civil law is no longer sustainable. This article examines what the social concept regulated by modern civil law meant, and how this social concept is changing today. Through this, it is intended to gain useful implications for discussions on social enterprises, social economy and social values ​that are emphasized in the context of ESG today.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이상돈, "형법의 근대성과 대화이론" 홍문사 1994

2 양천수, "현대사회의 구조변혁과 법규범의 대응 방향" 인간학연구소 (46) : 37-75, 2022

3 양창수, "헌법과 민법: 민법의 관점에서" (109) : 1999

4 프리초프 카프라, "최후의 전환: 지속 가능한 미래를 위한 커먼즈와 생태법" 경희대학교 출판문화원 2019

5 니클라스 루만, "체계이론 입문" 새물결 2014

6 칼 라렌츠, "정당한 법의 원리" 박영사 2022

7 양천수, "와가츠마 사카에(我妻榮)의 법진화론" 안암법학회 (65) : 57-94, 2022

8 심재우, "열정으로서의 법철학" 박영사 2020

9 존 헨리 메리만, "시민법전통: 대륙법과 영미법의 비교" 경남대학교 출판부 2007

10 양천수, "서브프라임 금융위기와 법" 한국학술정보 2011

11 니클라스 루만, "사회의 사회2" 새물결 2014

12 니클라스 루만, "사회의 사회1" 새물결 2014

13 구스타프 라드브루흐, "법철학" 박영사 2021

14 양천수, "법의 근대성과 탈근대성 - 하버마스와 투렌의 기획을 중심으로 하여 -" 법학연구소 50 (50): 161-191, 2009

15 이철우, "법에 있어서 ‘근대’ 개념-얼마나 유용한가" (16.17) : 1999

16 최병조, "법률관계를 고찰하는 양대 관점: 의무중심적 고찰과 권리중심적 고찰" 59 (59): 2018

17 권영준, "민법학의 기본원리" 박영사 2020

18 양창수, "민법학에서 법철학은 무엇인가? ― 개인적 점묘 ―" 한국법철학회 22 (22): 7-26, 2019

19 양천수, "물건 개념 재검토 - 민법의 개정 방향과 관련하여 -" 법조협회 70 (70): 50-79, 2021

20 최병조, "로마법강의" 박영사 2007

21 이동진, "데이터오너십" 박영사 2019

22 양천수, "단체의 법이론" 경인문화사 2022

23 양천수, "기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 법준수프로그램(CP)에 관한 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 2010

24 루돌프 폰 예링, "권리를 위한 투쟁/법감정의 형성에 관하여" 새물결 2017

25 양천수, "공익과 사익의 혼융현상을 통해 본 공익 개념: 공익 개념에 대한 법사회학적 분석" 5 (5): 2008

26 안톤 멩거, "가난한 사람의 민법" 정독 2019

27 內田貴, "高校生のための法学入門: 法学とはどんな学問なのか" 信山社 2022

28 我妻榮, "近代法における債權の優越的地位" 有斐閣 1954

29 能見善久, "法の世界における人と物の区別" 信山社 2022

30 星野英一, "民法のすすめ" 岩波書店 2015

31 潮見佳男, "契約法理の現代化" 有斐閣 2004

32 內田貴, "契約の再生" 弘文堂 1990

33 內田貴, "制度的契約論 : 民營化と契約" 羽鳥書店 2010

34 瀬川信久, "不法行為法における法と社会: JR東海事件から考える" 信山社 2021

35 U. Mattei, "The Turning Point in Private Law: Ecology, Technology and the Commons" Edward Elgar Publishing 2019

36 N. Luhmann, "Systemtheorie der Gesellschaft" 2018

37 H. Kelsen, "Reine Rechtslehre: Studienausgabe der 1" Tübingen 2008

38 M. Rehbinder, "Rechtssoziologie" 2014

39 M. Sandel, "Public Philosophy : Essays on Morality in Politics" Harvard University Press 2005

40 Guido Calabresi, "Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One view of Cathedral" 85 : 1089-, 1972

41 P. Zumbansen, "Ordnungsmuster im modernen Wohlfahrtsstaat:Lernerfahrungen zwischen Staat" Gesellschaft und Vertrag 2000

42 F. v. Liszt, "Lehrbuch des Deutschen Strafrechts" 1919

43 Anis A. Dani, "Inclusive States : Social Policy and Structural Inequalities" World Bank 2008

44 N. Luhmann, "Grundrechte als Institution: Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie" 1999

45 F. Tönnies, "Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft" 2005

46 G. Teubner, "Die anonyme Matrix: Zu Menschenrechtsverletzungen durch ‘private’ transnationale Akteure" 44 : 2006

47 N. Luhmann, "Die Grenzen der Verwaltung" 2021

48 J. Keane, "Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions" Stanford University Press 1998

49 D. Medicus, "Bürgerliches Recht: Eine nach Anspruchsgrundlagen geordnete Darstellung zur Examensvorbereitung" 2011