RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Sentiment Analysis Technique for Textual Reviews Using Neutrosophic Set Theory in the Multi-Criteria Decision- Making System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109102996

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In recent times, numerous decision-making procedures are not only based on the decision-making of choices, but also public perceptions of possible solutions. In a multi-criteria-based decision-making system, user preferences have been deeply considere...

      In recent times, numerous decision-making procedures are not only based on the decision-making of choices, but also public perceptions of possible solutions. In a multi-criteria-based decision-making system, user preferences have been deeply considered. Sentiment analysis, on either side, is similar to natural language processing dedicated to the creation of methods capable of assessing evaluations and determining their intensity. The main aim of this research is to make efficient decisions using social media tweets. The proposed method uses the SentiRank method and neutrosophic set theory to make decisions and rank the reviews. Novel multi-criteria-based neutrosophic theory is used in this research for decision-making. An assembled neutral vocabulary, and the adapted VADER, are used to create Neutro-VADER, a novel version. Every evaluation of a product feature is given a positive, neutral, or negative scores of sentiment by the Neutro-VADER. A unique idea at this level is to use the positive, neutral, and negative scores on emotion to represent reality, uncertainty, and falsehood participation levels of a neutrosophic number. The testing findings support the value of sentiment data through reviews in the ranking procedure. The performance metrics used in the systems are precision, recall, and F1 measures and accuracy for evaluating the aspect detection module. The system performs better in food, service, and pricing categories, whereas the anecdotes group gives bad results. F1 and accuracy level shows better results in the proposed system by using SentiRank and the neutrosophic set theory method.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼