근로자 상병급여제도 비교법 연구와 도입방안

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Sickness is a serious social danger that impacts the livelihoods of individuals, including with the ability to earn an income as well as depriving families of stable lives and causing pain in the body.
To prevent this, the ILO provided specific criteria for the sickness benefit system in the conventions and recommendation. Most OECD countries have adopted the sickness benefit schemes, but our society is not yet introducing it. As a model, the main contents of the sickness benefit system in France and Sweden are as follows.
In France, health insurance is responsible for sickness benefits. As a qualification, it confirms the contributions to health insurance along with the length of employment. It has special exceptions for long-term illnesses and admits overlapping benefits with other social security benefits. Furthermore, the company dispends the employee supplementary benefits to take care of income other than sickness benefits.
In Sweden, the sickness benefit is paid according to the degree of loss of labor capacity and not unemployment. Parental-leave benefit is added to the sickness benefit for childcare. A dedicated manager exists to assist ill employees, and the company helps them quickly by giving them the sickness pay which saves on finances prior to the social insurance’s sickness benefit.
In comparison, the legislation bills proposed in the past have been to establish a paid sick leave in the Labor Standards Act or to create ickness benefit in the employment insurance. However, the former has the disadvantage that it does not cope with long-term disease; the latter does not include the self-employed.
Therefore, this paper proposes health insurance as the sickness benefit system to cover all people and suggests that anyone who contributes to health insurance is paid by the sickness benefit not according to the length of employment such as the employment insurance. The benefits duration is 6 months and can be received up to 1 year. Benefits are 50% of ordinary wages, but increase with the number of dependents.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 상병급여제도의 필요성
• Ⅱ. ILO의 상병급여제도 내용
• Ⅲ. 프랑스의 상병급여제도 내용
• Ⅳ. 스웨덴의 상병급여제도 내용
• Ⅴ. 상병급여제도의 도입방안
• Ⅵ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정현우, "한국 상병수당제도 및 전달체계 설계연구: 주요 선진국과의 제도 비교를 중심으로" 한국보건행정학회 29 (29): 112-129, 2019

2 김기태, "한국 공적 상병수당 도입을 위한 제도 비교연구 및 정책제언" 한국사회복지정책학회 45 (45): 148-179, 2018

3 "프랑스 최저임금 안내"

4 "프랑스 공공서비스 안내"

5 문성웅, "주요국의 상병수당제도 현황 고찰 및 시사점 연구" 국민건강보험 건강보험정책연구원 2015

6 이승윤, "아픈 노동자는 왜 가난해지는가? - 아픈 노동자의 빈곤화과정과 소득보장제의 경험" 한국사회정책학회 24 (24): 113-150, 2017

7 "스웨덴 국립보험청"

8 정혜주, "서울형 유급병가 지원제도 시행의 의의와 향후 발전방향" 참여연대사회복지위원회 (251) : 2019

9 정형준, "상병수당 도입의 필요성" 참여연대사회복지위원회 (222) : 2017

10 신기철, "상병소득보장제도 충실화 방안 연구 (급여소득자를 중심으로)" 한국사회보장학회 27 (27): 133-156, 2011

11 김종수, "상병급여제도에 관한 소고" 서울대 사회보장법연구회 5 (5): 2016

12 김은아, "사회보장시스템과 상병급여" 대한직업환경의학회 2015

13 정진우, "사상병시 소득보장제도에 관한 비교법적 고찰" 한국노동연구원 9 (9): 225-259, 2009

14 조성혜, "근로자의 질병 시 소득보장제도 ― 한국과 독일의 법제 비교를 중심으로 ―" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 26 (26): 553-612, 2018

15 "국회 의안정보 시스템"

16 국회입법조사처, "국회 간담회 자료" 2017

17 European Commission, "wYour social security rights in France" 2019

18 European Commission, "Your social security rights in Sweden" 2019

19 OECD, "Sickness, Disability and Work : Breaking the Barriers Sweden :Will the Recent Reforms Make it" 2009

20 Levy, Jennifer-Ella, "Les arrêt de travail et leur indemnisation" Edition du puits fleuri 2012

21 Liaisons sociales pratique, "Le Mémo social 2019" WoltersKluwer France 2019

22 WolterKluwer, "Le Lamy social 2020" WolterKluwer France 2020

23 Borgetto, Michel, "Droit de la sécurité sociale" Dalloz 2019

24 Kessler, Francis, "Droit de la protection sociale" Dalloz 2018

25 Ginon, Anne-Sophei, "Code de la sécurité sociale" Dalloz 2018

26 서울시, "2020 서울형 유급병가지원 사업지침" 2020