RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      [특집] 중국의 안보정책 대안

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109215196

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article tries to shed new light on strategic issues relevant to China as a major player in the Asia-Pacific region. It begins with a description of the changed geopolitical environment in Northeast Asia, followed by an analysis on China's threat ...

      This article tries to shed new light on strategic issues relevant to China as a major player in the Asia-Pacific region. It begins with a description of the changed geopolitical environment in Northeast Asia, followed by an analysis on China's threat percep tions. It concludes with a prediction that a new “Great East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere” will come true in the 21st century. It has been commonly acceptable that US Forces in East Asia played important blancing role against the Soviet threat during Cold War years. The end of the Cold War, however, diminished the raison d'etre of the US Forces in the area. So it is desirable for the US Forces to withdraw from this area. Russian threat has been declined and also regional dialogue on the security in North east Asia has been develped. Accordingly, even if Russia should revitalize itself as a military power in some time, it could be con tained in the reginal security mechanism. Moreover, three coun tries in Northeast Asia, China, Korea, Japan shares the tradition of using Hanchi( Chinese charcters) for thousands of years. Three countries have been pursuing managed economic devel opment that is based on the authoritarian pluralism. Because of these common characters, the three countries could build up mu tual cooperation regime in Northeast Asia. The real threat to the PRC's current regime comes not from foreign military intervention, as it was mistakenly perceived by Mao Zedong and his comrades-in arm during the Cold War years, but from Chinese people's pervasive dissatisfaction with the regime's corruption, which is clearly discerned by Deng Xiaoping and his successors today. Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Unless a political reform is launched and succeeds, in which the current regime in China takes initiative to change it self from one-party dictatorship to a multi-party check-and-bal ance democracy, the corruption will not end but the regime will end. The current regime will definitely change, hopefully and quite possibly, through its own political reform or, otherwise, be changed by angered people. Several factors may work in favor of extending people's pa tience before the political reform is introduce. Economic develop ment is, of course, the most effective factor for the reason that it improves people's living standard and thus makes them less rebel lious. Enhancing the nation's international prestige is another stabi lizing factor. It is commonsensical that a regime can survive longer than expected if it can hold high the nation's international prestige, and that revolution is more likely to occur in a nation defeated or humiliated by foreign enemies. The Mainland-Taiwan reunification is yet another factor of na tional emotion in favor of the central goverment in Beijing to continue its rule. Punishing Taiwanese separatists offers a good opportunity for Beijing to unite the mainland people around the goverment, if the PLA is able to execute the military punishment in an excellent way. The next 15years will be important for the world in a transi tion from making expedient adjustment to the post-Cold War en vironment to searching for ways toward global eternal harmony. The major orientation of this transition is guided by the fact that “economics has taken command of international relations븬?ideol ogy has declined in the face of pragmatic impulses stemming from economic primacy.”23 However, economic development alone may not necessarily lead to intra-national and internation al harmony. Political devebpment and ideological convergence must follow. Northeast Asia, where the best planned capitalist economy in Japan and South Korea meets the most market-ori ented socialist economy in China and where social discipline and participatory are equally appreciated, may become a vanguard in the search for the harmony based on socialism-capitalism conver gence. History tends to repeat itself, though not exactly in every de tail an

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 동북아 하위 지역에서의 지정학적 환경
      • Ⅲ. 변화된 세계 속에서의 중국의 위협에 대한 인식 변화
      • Ⅳ. 신 “대동아공영권”
      • Summary
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 동북아 하위 지역에서의 지정학적 환경
      • Ⅲ. 변화된 세계 속에서의 중국의 위협에 대한 인식 변화
      • Ⅳ. 신 “대동아공영권”
      • Summary
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼