지식공유형 ODA 사업의 평가: 정책형성이론과 KSP 사업 실증 분석결과를 활용한 대안적 평가 프레임워크 = Evaluation of Knowledge Sharing ODA: An Evaluation Framework Utilizing Policy Formulation Theory and Empirical Analysis Results of KSP Projects

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As knowledge sharing ODA (such as the Knowledge Sharing Program (KSP) initiated by the Korean government in 2004) has been gaining strategic importance in the field of international development, the systematic evaluation of such projects is also being emphasized. Nevertheless, it is difficult to apply traditional evaluation methods to knowledge sharing ODA due to unique characteristics that are different from other ODA programs. For this reason, the development of a customized evaluation framework is necessary in order to evaluate the policy effectiveness of the knowledge sharing activities adequately. This paper introduces the development of an evaluation framework for knowledge sharing ODA programs utilizing policy formulation theory, theory-based evaluation methods, and the results of empirical analysis of KSP data. The evaluation framework is then applied to evaluate the KSP projects for Agro-Processing Development in Cambodia, from which a thorough analysis of project outcomes and restraints based on the structured evaluation frame and standards was possible.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

우리나라에서 2004년부터 시행해오고 있는 경제발전경험공유사업(Knowldege Sharing Program: KSP)과 같은 지식공유형 ODA 사업은 범지구적으로 전략적 중요성이 증가하고 있는 ODA 사업 유형 중 하나이다. 이에 대한 체계적 평가의 중요성 역시 증가함에도 불구하고 지식공유형 ODA 사업은 다른 통상적인 개발협력 사업과는 다른 특수한 형태의 개발협력 사업이기 때문에 통상적인 평가 방법론을 적용할 수 있는 여지가 대단히 제한적이다. 따라서 지식공유의 결과가 수원국에서 실제로 정책적 효과성을 발생시켰는가의 여부를 평가하기 위해서는 지식공유형 사업의 특수성에 특화된 대안적 평가 프레임워크의 개발 및 적용이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 정책학의 이론 중 정책형성 이론, 국제개발협력 분야의 평가에서 활발히 활용되는 이론기반평가(Theory Based Evaluation: TBE) 방법론, 그리고 KSP 사업의 과거 실적 데이터에 대한 실증분석 결과들을 결합하여 지식공유형 ODA 사업의 평가에 특화한 평가 프레임워크를 개발을 시도하였다. 마지막으로, 개발된 프레임워크를 캄보디아 농산물가공산업 육성 KSP 사업의 평가에 적용하여, 사업의 성공여부와 성공 및 한계요인을 구조화된 틀과 평가기준에 맞추어 분석 하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정정길, "정책학원론" 大明出版社 [서울] 2010

2 정정길, "정책학원론" 대명출판사 [서울] 2003

3 남궁근, "정책학" 법문사 2012

4 장석준, "정책유형별 확산 메커니즘의 차별적 영향력에 관한 실증 연구" 한국정책학회 22 (22): 253-284, 2013

5 전진영, "정책유형별 입법과정 비교분석: 정책의제의 설정 및 대안채택과정을 중심으로" 한국정당학회 8 (8): 35-65, 2009

6 노화준, "교수논문; 의사결정과정 파라다임의 비교분석" 16 (16): 1092-1110, 1978

7 정정길, "경제발전 이념과 정책과정" 1 : 28-46, 1986

8 Cortell, A. P, "do international institutions matter? The domestic impact of international rules and norms" 40 (40): 451-478, 1996

9 Dahl, R, "Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City" Yale University Press 1961

10 Rogers, P. J, "Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions" 14 (14): 29-48, 2008

11 Cortell, A. P, "Understanding the domestic impact of international norms:A research agenda" 2 (2): 65-87, 2000

12 Dye, T. R, "Top down policymaking" Chatham House Publishers 2001

13 White, Howard, "Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice" 1 (1): 271-284, 2009

14 Stame, Nicoletta, "Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity" 10 (10): 58-76, 2004

15 Birckmayer, Johanna D, "Theory-Based Evaluation in Practice: What Do We Learn?" 24 : 407-, 2000

16 Morra, L. G, "The road to results: designing and conducting effective development evaluations" World Bank 2009

17 Weiss, Carol H, "The many meanings of research utilization" 426-431, 1979

18 Weiss, Carol H, "The interface between evaluation and public policy" 5 (5): 468-486, 1999

19 D’Souza, Dinesh, "The Billionaire Next Door"

20 Fisher, R.A, "The Arrangement of Field Experiments" 33 : 503-513, 1926

21 OECD, "Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration" Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 149-, 2008

22 Howlett, M, "Studying public policy–Policy cycles and policy subsystems" 2-, 2003

23 Holland, P. W, "Statistics and causal inference" 81 (81): 945-960, 1986

24 G20 Development Working Group, "Saint Petersburg Accountability Report on G20Development Commitments" 67-, 2013

25 Vogel, Isabel, "Review of the use of ‘Theory of Change’ in international development" UK Department for International Development (DFID) 2012

26 European Commission, "Reforming Technical Cooperation and Project Implementation Units for External Aid provided by the European Commission: A Backbone Strategy" 2008

27 ActionAid, "Real Aid: Making technical assistance work" 28-, 2006

28 OECD DAC, "Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance"

29 Wilson, J. Q, "Political organizations" Basic Books 327-346, 1973

30 Heckman, J. J, "Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme" 64 (64): 605-654, 1997

31 기획재정부, "Knowledge Sharing Programme: 경제발전경험 공유사업" KSP Brochure 2013

32 Angrist, J. D, "Handbook of labor economics, 3" 1277-1366, 1999

33 Lowi, T. J, "Four systems of policy, politics, and choice" 32 (32): 298-310, 1972

34 Rossi, P. H, "Evaluation: A systematic approach" Sage publications 2003

35 Rubin, D. B, "Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies" 66 (66): 688-, 1974

36 OECD DAC, "Converged Statistical Reporting Directives for the Creditor Reporting System (CRS) and the Annual Dac Questionnaire"

37 Kotvojs, F, "Contribution analysis: a new approach to evaluation in international development" 7 (7): 27-, 2007

38 International Aid Transparency Initiative, "Complementary roles for the OECD-DAC Creditor Reporting System and the International Aid Transparency Initiative"

39 GSDRC, "Changing approaches to technical assistance"

40 OECD, "Beyond the Millennium Development Goals: Towards an OECD contribution to the post-2015 agenda"

41 Birkland, T. A, "An introduction to the policy process. Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making" ME Sharpe 2001

42 Kingdon, J, "Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies" Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers 1995

43 Mayne, J, "Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: using performance measures sensibly" 16 (16): 1-24, 2001

44 Coryn, Chris L.S, "A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009" 32 (32): 199-226, 2011