한국언론중재제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구 : 한국언론중재위원회를 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This Study is mainly focused on the ways to improve the system of relief in cases of press infrigement, with a special emphasis on the Korean Press Arbitration Commission.
Cardinal analysis was made as below in this study.
1. the legal basis and characteristics of Press Arbitration Commission(PAC).
2. Haw PAC is accepted to journalists and the general public.
3. what relationship with PAC and press ethic commission(PEC), the press self control system.
4. whether there are some discord with constitution in PAC or not.
5. what kind of affection PAC occur to actual activity of journalists.
6. the rational ways to improve the press arbitration system.
The PAC is very unique because that is a compulsory system backed up by law of periodicals. the similar system couldn't seen in other country. the PAC was started in 1981 base on basic law of the press. As well known, the law was made to control the press by the couped military government.
Despite this vulnerable point in born, the PAC has been faithfully fulfilling its duty for the last 20 years. Now the commission is being recognized for its nessecity by the public and is doing it's mission in cases of press infrigement.
But doing the mission by the government office, not by the court is still vulnerable point and basic problem of this system, the mission is checking the details of press reporting and making judgements in cases of press infrigement.
There are no democratic countries that have this kind of system. We can see the similar systems in socialism countries or military rolling countries.
In this study, we have known the PAC is blamed as unconstitutional in such points as consideration and authoritative arbitration function. and the faction of PAC is overlapping with the press ethic commission(PEC), the press self control system. there is another blame of the government system make the self control system powerless.
So the only way the PAC has strong power maintaining the structure and system is by changing the character of the commission from compulsive system to self control system.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 문제의 제기 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 목적 = 3
• 제3절 연구의 범위와 방법 = 4
• 제2장 현행 언론중재위원회의 성격 규정 = 7
• 제1절 법적 근거와 역할 = 7
• 제2절 조직과 재정 = 10
• 제3절 신문윤리위원회와의 비교 = 12
• 제3장 언론중재위원회 현황 = 17
• 제1절 중재 및 심의실적 = 17
• 제2절 각종 업무실적과 성과 = 22
• 제3절 중재위에 대한 기존 의식조사 분석 = 24
• 제4장 언론중재위원회 제도의 문제점 = 31
• 제1절 태생적 한계와 신문윤리위원회와의 업무중복 문제 = 31
• 제2절 헌법상의 문제 = 34
• 제3절 실제 운영과정의 문제-언론자유와 보도활동에 미치는 영향 = 38
• 제5장 선진외국의 언론피해구제제도 = 43
• 제1절 유럽의 언론피해구제제도 = 43
• 제2절 미국의 언론피해구제제도 = 50
• 제3절 캐나다와 오스트레일리아의 언론피해구제제도 = 55
• 제4절 세계언론평의회 협의회(WAPC) = 58
• 제6장 언론중재위원회 제도의 개선방안 = 61
• 제1절 언론사 자율구제기구의 도입과 권한 강화 = 61
• 제2절 해체후 언론윤리위, 언론평의회 등으로 대체방안 = 66
• 제3절 성격의 대폭 개편방안 - 중재위와 윤리위의 통합후 권한 감화 = 69
• 제7장 요약 및 결론 = 75
• 참고문헌 = 79
• ABSTRACT = 81