RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국제 경기기록 활용한 남자 휠체어농구 승패요인 탐색 : 2018~2019 국제대회를 중심으로 = Analysis Exploring the factors of win or loss in men's wheelchair basketball using international game records : Focusing on the 2018~2019 international competition

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108131881

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to explore the factors of winning or losing and the determinants of the upper and lower countries using game records. For the purpose of the study, the study was conducted on official records provided in 95 games in 2018 and 2019. The analysis variables were based on 9 shooting variables and 7 technical variables, and independent sample t-test and decision tree analysis were performed to confirm the difference between the winning and losing games and the difference between the upper and lower countries. According to the research, the first 2point shot success and the attack rebound were the biggest differences in the winning game and the losing game. Second, the biggest difference between the upper and lower countries was the difference in 2point and 3point shots, assist and turnover. Third, the winning and losing factors in the decision-making factor were 2point shots and attack rebounds, while the upper and lower countries were assists and turnovers. In conclusion, in order to win the Paralympics, a two-point shooting success and rebound success rate must be prepared.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to explore the factors of winning or losing and the determinants of the upper and lower countries using game records. For the purpose of the study, the study was conducted on official records provided in 95 games in 2018 a...

      The purpose of this study is to explore the factors of winning or losing and the determinants of the upper and lower countries using game records. For the purpose of the study, the study was conducted on official records provided in 95 games in 2018 and 2019. The analysis variables were based on 9 shooting variables and 7 technical variables, and independent sample t-test and decision tree analysis were performed to confirm the difference between the winning and losing games and the difference between the upper and lower countries. According to the research, the first 2point shot success and the attack rebound were the biggest differences in the winning game and the losing game. Second, the biggest difference between the upper and lower countries was the difference in 2point and 3point shots, assist and turnover. Third, the winning and losing factors in the decision-making factor were 2point shots and attack rebounds, while the upper and lower countries were assists and turnovers. In conclusion, in order to win the Paralympics, a two-point shooting success and rebound success rate must be prepared.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.66 0.66 0.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.66 0.66 0.593 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼