RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      원청사업주의 단체교섭의무와 실질적 지배력 판단기준 및 교섭사항 = Collective Bargaining Obligation of a Third Party (Primary Contractors, etc.) with Actual Control, Criteria for Determining Actual Control, and Objects of Collective Bargaining

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109433397

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Indirect employment has been prevalent in the workplace for a long time. Labor law scholars have continued to argue that third parties (primary contractors, etc.) who actually control and determine working conditions of indirectly employed workers should assume employer responsibility under the Labor Union Act in order to improve the labor conditions of indirectly employed workers.
      In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled third parties(primary contractors) with actual control as employers under the Labor Union Act and also ruled unfair labor practices through control or intervention(Hyundai Heavy Industries case). Meanwhile, there was a recent case where the National Labor Relations Commission and the court recognized third parties(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control as employers under the Labor Union Act in an unfair labor practice case of refusal to collective bargaining(in 2021-2024, a representative case is the CJ Express case). And the Supreme Court's full bench is currently reviewing an unfair labor practice case of refusal to collective bargaining(another Hyundai Heavy Industries case).
      While anticipating a Supreme Court's full bench ruling that recognizes employer responsibility under the Labor Union Act for third parties who actually control and determine the labor conditions of indirectly employed workers, this article focuses on two issues.
      First, through recent cases where a third party(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control was recognized as an employer under the Labor Union Act, this is a review of the specific criteria for determining actual control in relation to collective bargaining matters when indirectly employed workers and the third party engage in collective bargaining.
      Second, through the interpretation of the Constitution and the Labor Union Act, this is a review of what the objects of collective bargaining is subject to collective bargaining obligations by the third party with actual control, how the objects of collective bargaining should be distributed between the third party(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control and the direct employer, and whether collective bargaining can be conducted independently.
      번역하기

      Indirect employment has been prevalent in the workplace for a long time. Labor law scholars have continued to argue that third parties (primary contractors, etc.) who actually control and determine working conditions of indirectly employed workers sho...

      Indirect employment has been prevalent in the workplace for a long time. Labor law scholars have continued to argue that third parties (primary contractors, etc.) who actually control and determine working conditions of indirectly employed workers should assume employer responsibility under the Labor Union Act in order to improve the labor conditions of indirectly employed workers.
      In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled third parties(primary contractors) with actual control as employers under the Labor Union Act and also ruled unfair labor practices through control or intervention(Hyundai Heavy Industries case). Meanwhile, there was a recent case where the National Labor Relations Commission and the court recognized third parties(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control as employers under the Labor Union Act in an unfair labor practice case of refusal to collective bargaining(in 2021-2024, a representative case is the CJ Express case). And the Supreme Court's full bench is currently reviewing an unfair labor practice case of refusal to collective bargaining(another Hyundai Heavy Industries case).
      While anticipating a Supreme Court's full bench ruling that recognizes employer responsibility under the Labor Union Act for third parties who actually control and determine the labor conditions of indirectly employed workers, this article focuses on two issues.
      First, through recent cases where a third party(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control was recognized as an employer under the Labor Union Act, this is a review of the specific criteria for determining actual control in relation to collective bargaining matters when indirectly employed workers and the third party engage in collective bargaining.
      Second, through the interpretation of the Constitution and the Labor Union Act, this is a review of what the objects of collective bargaining is subject to collective bargaining obligations by the third party with actual control, how the objects of collective bargaining should be distributed between the third party(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control and the direct employer, and whether collective bargaining can be conducted independently.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼